It is time to recall the warrior spirit of our grandfathers.

Monday was Remembrance Day.  It is an odd day for Canadians who think of Canadian military as peace keepers.  It is hard for our soy infused culture to believe that Canada once produced fierce warriors.  Canadian troops were so fierce that they filled German soldiers with dread.

Canadian soldiers would emerge from the First World War with a reputation for winning victories that others could not. But even in a war of unparalleled ferocity, enemy and ally alike would remember the Canadians as having been particularly brutal.

What happened to Canada?  Do you think men like the trench raiders of WW1 would have put up with Justin Trudeau for even a minute?  How could their grandchildren sit idly while the king of fools destroys the country while robbing it blind?

Calgary Conservative MP Stephanie Kusie is accusing federal Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault of corruption related to the so-called “green slush fund.” 

On Friday, Kusie (Calgary Midnapore) said Guilbeault invested $254 million into a company he owns.

Our current federal government is the most corrupt government in our history.  The level of theft is off the charts.  This is not a problem that will solve itself because the rot starts at the top.  We have the most corrupt government in our history because we have the most corrupt prime minister in our history.

But the primary failure is due to the fact Prime Minister Justin Trudeau sets the standard of ethical conduct for cabinet ministers – he alone can hire and fire them for any reason – and given his example, it’s hardly surprising his ministers keep breaking the law.

The Trudeau liberals are the largest criminal organization in Canada.  They will continue to steal until we stop them.  That means Canadians must relearn how to be warriors. We had it in us once; we need to find it again.

Dangerous by design

Work and Family commitments have kept me from posting much lately.  During my posting absence more and more information has been piling up about COVID vaccinations; none of it good.  To start there is this article detailing how now nearly twice as many pilots fail their yearly medicals since the jabs.

Most of these pilots were disqualified due to heart problems.  Heart damage is one of the more common Jab injuries that have been documented in multiple studies.

The data from King County, WA, suggests a significant ecological and temporal association between excess cardiopulmonary arrest mortality and the COVID-19 vaccination campaign

While Heart attacks are one of the most common injuries they are far from being the only deadly side effect from trusting government.  The COVID jabs have multiple mechanisms that can cause death.  A fact that is readily apparent in the soaring excess deaths.

 

We found all-cause death risks to be even higher for those vaccinated with one and two doses compared to the unvaccinated and that the booster doses were ineffective. We also found a slight but statistically significant loss of life expectancy for those vaccinated with 2 or 3/4 doses.

 

Scientists in Japan have issued a chilling warning after uncovering direct links between Covid mRNA “vaccines” and “shocking” surges in dozens of deadly diseases.

 

All countries investigated experienced continued all-cause excess mortality during 2022, compared to pre-pandemic years. For most, excess mortality in 2022 was higher than in 2021 and 2020.

The jabs are deadly.  Of that there is no doubt.  Yet there are still no bans.  Can you think of any other medication or treatment with this many injuries that was not quickly banned?  I think at this point we must consider that the jabs are producing the intended results.  Governments are culling the herds.  That might be hard to believe but as Dr. Yeadon points out ingredients are not added to new medications by accident.  Everything is used for a purpose and in this case the purpose is nefarious.

Let me tell you that every component in a medicine is chosen. It’s chosen to be there. It’s not random. It’s chosen to be there to achieve some purpose,

The jabs have been designed to go anywhere which gives them the potential to damage anything.  You can distil that down to this simple statement.  The COVID jabs have been designed to damage every part of your body.  This is not really new information.  I have been warning about this since 2021.

When the vaccines were first developed the designers were operating under 2 assumptions.

  1. The spike protein without the rest of the virus was harmless.
  2. The spike proteins would not leave the injection site (the shoulder)

We now know that both of those assumptions are wrong.  The spike protein is not safe.  On its own it is a toxin that produces all of the disease symptoms.  It also does not stay in your shoulder.  The organ damage in these autopsy photos prove that conclusively.

These products are dangerous by design.  They are weapons.  The people who used these weapons need to be in prison.

Government lies kill millions at home and abroad

In February of 2022 when Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine the media was eager to tell me that it was the start of a Russian campaign to conquer Europe.  I did not believe the narrative because I knew 3 things to be true.

  1. The Government Lies
  2. The media lies
  3. During war everybody lies

The invasion also occurred during COVID a period of unprecedented lies.  During Peak COVID stupidity if the media had reported that the sky was blue I would not have believed it without stepping outside to check for myself.

I knew with absolute certainty I was being lied to.  If I wanted to know the truth I would need to do my own research, which I did.  This is what I found.

The instigated emergency is the war in The Ukraine.  This is a real war and people are dying so this is at least an actual emergency.  It is also a direct result of the script writers and they have been working on this almost as long as the climate emergency.  The fabricated climate emergency started 1988; Al Gore kicked it in to high gear in 2005. The instigated Ukrainian war was started in 1994 and hit warp speed with the fraudulent election of Joe Biden in 2020.

Yesterday I found this video on Martin Armstrong’s site discussing everything I wrote about in March of 2022.

Even today the media wants us to believe Putin has designs on all of Europe when there is absolutely no proof of this.  It has been 2.5 years and Putin has not sent a single soldier outside the borders of the Ukraine.  But, we did not need to wait 2.5 years to understand that an invasion of Europe was not in the cards.  Initial reports were that the invasion started with less than 200 thousand men.  More recent reports put that number less than 100 thousand.  Contrast that with both gulf wars where the US started with over 1 million coalition forces each time.  If you want to achieve a quick victory and sweep through Europe you start with that level of overwhelming force.  Putin did not do that even though he could have.

In February of 2022 Putin had no intentions of sweeping through Europe or even conquering all of the Ukraine.  He meant to send a message and it worked.  Within 5 days Ukraine had brokered a deal that would have ended everything and saved the lives of a million Ukrainian soldiers.  Our governments did not allow that deal to be completed.  This is the kind of evil that permeates western governments.  These people have no empathy or regard for human life.

Today Americans are choosing between a woman who was part of the lies or a man who wants the war to end.  Donald Trump is not a perfect man but he summed up his policy on the Ukraine war in the best way possible.  When a dishonest reporter (is there any other kind?) insinuated Trump was a Putin sympathizer he answered simply “I want people to stop dying”.  Put up with the mean tweets.  Choose the man who chooses life.

The only reason you need to ignore the alarmists

A couple of weeks ago I found this post on Jo Nova’s site.  I have been meaning to comment on it for a while but as per usual life kept getting in the way.  I did not forget about it though because I think it contains a very important point.  Her excellent post gives you the only reason that you need to disregard climate alarmists.  Before I get to her point, I want to give you the background as to why I think the post is so important.

I have posted before that the climate consensus is not what you are told.  You can follow this link to an interview Judith Curry did where she discusses the same thing.

when you talk about ‘scientific consensus,’ like the Earth orbits the sun, you don’t need to say ‘There’s a consensus that the Earth orbits the sun,’ it’s a well-known fact. When you’re talking about consensus, it’s usually on a topic where there is disagreement, and a government has asked a group to come to some sort of an agreement on what’s what. You see it in science, you see it in. . . medical boards. . . So, it’s a manufactured consensus. It’s a consensus of scientists, which is different than a scientific consensus. . . there’s a true scientific consensus on very little of this, you know that,

All scientists agree that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and adding more to the atmosphere should cause some warming.  That is where the consensus ends.  There is no consensus about how much warming or if that warming will be harmful.  In a previous post I summarized the 4 schools of thought about how much warming additional CO2 might cause.  The warming estimates range from a fraction of a degree to several degrees.  A fraction of a degree is hardly noticeable.  Several degrees could be harmful but even that is uncertain since, despite what you are told, there is no clear link between hot temperatures and natural disasters.

If you are following the logic it went like this.  CO2 causes hot weather which causes dangerous weather related events (Climate change).  They cannot prove either link.  You cannot link CO2 to dangerous levels of warming and you cannot link hot weather to increased dangerous weather events.  This is a 2 link chain and both links are broken yet somehow they are getting away with this farce.

The highest estimates used by the alarmist crowd are based on the existence of positive feedback that has never been proven.  Low estimates come from scientists who believe that the feedback is negative or that the overall impact of greenhouse gases has been overstated.  That group believes the cumulative impact of all greenhouse gases is small so adding more makes very little difference.

So, there is a consensus, but it is not a useful consensus since no one can agree if we have anything to worry about.  “The science” is not settled, and the data supports the notion that the impact will be negligible.

Our analysis revealed that the solar forcing (i.e., TSI and albedo changes) measured by CERES explain 100% of the observed global warming trend and 83% of the interannual GSAT variability over the past 24 years 

According to this analysis and a recently released paper by Dr. Willie Soon, the warming to date has been caused by the sun.  Even though CO2 went up during this period and should have caused some warming you can’t see it.  This is what almost brings us to the point of the Jo Nova post.  Science is more of a verb than a noun.  It is not a thing that you can touch, it is a series of actions you can take to uncover the truth.  And there is a consensus as to how science should be done.

To guarantee a fair test when you are conducting your experiment, you need to make sure that the only thing you change is the independent variable. And, all the controlled variables must remain constant. Only then can you be sure that the change you make to the independent variable actually caused the changes you observe in the dependent variables.

 

In order to develop a hypothesis, one should have:

A good testable question

Understanding of the dependent, independent and control variables of interest

Some prior knowledge, such as from observations and research

The scientific method acknowledges that you do not know what is causing the phenomena you are studying.  It also cautions that there could be more than one contributing cause.  That means to do science correctly you must first consider all possible causes.  When you design an experiment, you must control the variables which might affect the outcome.  If you are studying a large natural system, you must collect data to assess the relative impact of variables that are outside of your control.

Finally, that gets us back to Jo Nova.

Nobody mention the 91 volcanoes they discovered there seven years ago which line up with the warmest parts of Antarctica. We sit on a ball of lava, and there is an edge of crustal plate under there. But really, it’s more likely the warming is caused by your Ford fiesta and those beef kebabs…

To the lunatic alarmists everything is caused by climate change.  There is absolutely nothing else that can melt ice even active volcanoes under the ice.  Climate change also has only one cause, CO2.  Alarmists do not follow the scientific method because they are not trying to account for other variables.  They won’t even consider glaringly obvious factors like volcanoes or the sun.

If you do not follow the scientific method, you are not doing science.  The people who lecture you about science being settled are not even doing science.  That is the only reason you need to ignore them.  You don’t need to sift through all the papers and try to understand them.  All you need to know is that they are not doing science, so their predictions of the upcoming climate apocalypse are worthless.