Vax hesitancy is not from misinformation

Governments, in particular Canadian governments are aggressively promoting the latest COVID jabs.  They are gearing up expensive marketing programs designed to convince people to take the jabs.  This time I doubt it will work.  Every jab roll out in Canada has been less warmly received than the last.  The plot below shows vaccine uptake by dose in the province of Alberta.

I do not know how many people have taken the latest dose because the province no longer makes that information public which suggests to me the number is close to zero.  Jab advocates blame this growing hesitancy on misinformation but like all else COVID, that is a lie.  Jab hesitancy is just a byproduct of the return of common sense.  Even previously committed jab advocates are starting to question the logic of regular boosters.


When even vaccine advocates are refusing boosters the game is over.  People are finally starting to have the conversation that we should have had prior to the vaccine roll out.  What is the risk versus reward of an experimental treatment?  Of course Vax advocates will say that we didn’t have enough information to do a proper risk/reward analysis in 2021.  But even that excuse should scare you.  We did not know if the rewards outweigh the risks but we forced everyone to take it anyway.

We may not have understood the risks in 2021 but we should have understood the reward, and the reality is that the jabs at best offered very minimal protection.  That is why I was able to correctly predict this in May of 2021.

  1. These treatments only serve to give your immune system a Boost. They help improve your odds of survival.  They really do not do anything more than Vitamin D and Ivermectin.  But there is one crucial difference.  There are no known side effects for Vitamin D and Ivermectin.

  2. The benefit from the treatment is temporary. Antibodies fade quickly without the T cells you have no lasting immunity.  That is what the yearly booster shots are for.  The booster shots are not for new variants as you have been led to believe.

  3. We cannot reach herd immunity through Vaccination. To reach herd immunity everyone must still be exposed to the virus and get infected.

So we knew the benefit was marginal and there were better options than an experimental treatment.  But, we charged ahead with the maximum of stupidity and did it anyway.  Now with time even the most dense vax advocates are realizing that the risk/reward of these treatments does not work for any age group.  In fact the risk is so large government agencies are going out of their way to conceal just how much damage has been done.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is refusing to release the latest data related to heart failure recorded in patients who had recently received Covid vaccinations.

Remarkably after several rounds of injections we are still not even sure if the Jabs are harmful because they are working properly or because of poor quality control.

Replicating the findings of American scientists Kevin McKernan and Phillip Buckhaults, the German biologist Jürgen O. Kirchner has also found massive levels of DNA contamination in vials of the BioNTech-Pfizer mRNA vaccine deployed in the home country of the vaccine, Germany.

So we started with a treatment of limited benefit and then mass produced it with poor quality control.  Really, what could go wrong?  The quality control was poor because there was nothing compelling the manufacturers to improve the quality control.  Remember they have total immunity; Vaccine deaths never factored in to any decision making.  Dead people do not count.

The government though has a solution for the vaccine hesitancy.  No they did not force Pfizer to improve their quality control or even produce a treatment that works.  Instead they have found a way to vaccinate you against your will.

The “Air Vax” can be released into the air without the public’s consent or even people’s knowledge.

Problem solved right?  I don’t know about you but this brings me no comfort.  There is no benign explanation for this development.  Remember these things are not vaccines they do not produce immunity or reduce transmission therefore they produce no public health benefit.  Why would you force vaccinate the entire world when there is no public health benefit?  Why would you do it even if there was?

We all need to be concerned about this dangerous development.  Even if we vote against this it does not mean it won’t be forced on us.  Gain of function research was banned yet that did not stop it from happening and the virus was released by a group of government actors that no one voted for.  The virus was released by American deep state actors cooperating with China in opposition to the American administration.  What would stop deep state actors from releasing the vaccine?  If we don’t start punishing the people behind COVID our collective health is at risk.

Multiculturalism divides more deeply than COVID

Politicians are experts at divide and conquer.  That’s why identity politics and multi-culturalism are so popular with politicians.  They are effective tools to divide us in to groups and keep us in conflict with each other.  As long as we fight among ourselves politicians are free to do despicable things without much public attention.

Multiculturalism is a particularly destructive policy that I have written about many times on this blog.  Adopting multiculturalism is a sure fire method for destroying a nation.  A nation cannot exist with multiple cultures within its borders.  That why I wrote this more than 2 years ago

Western governments are also using multiculturalism to destroy our societies.  Prior to COVID multiculturalism was the most effective weapons governments wielded.  This is not about race it is about culture.  You can have a multi-racial society you just cannot have a multicultural society.  

And then a few months later I pointed out that multiculturalism leads to a balkanization of society which is a precursor for complete destruction of national identity.

We pursed multiculturalism with such zeal that we were willing to set aside our own laws to facilitate the complete destruction of Canadian Identity.  We now have polygamists complete with child brides in Canada.  Polygamy and statutory rape are illegal for Canadians but not for Hyphenated Canadians.  Hyphenated Canadians are only subject to the laws of the country they fled, even when those laws contradict Canadian law.  That is what 50 years of multiculturalism has brought us, Canada is nothing more than hundreds of separate groups pursuing their own self-interest.  It is simply no longer possible to bring Canadians together under a common cause.

This is of course the real purpose of multiculturalism.  Politicians cut society in to small groups and keep them waring with each other.  That is what keeps citizens from recognizing that their real power is in numbers.  The other group is not our enemy, the government is, and collectively all the balkanized groups outnumber the government 100 to 1.

When I write about governments using multiculturalism as a weapon I am sure the lunatic left ignores everything I say because to them I am a bigot.  Racism is the usual charge despite the fact that race has nothing to do with culture.  But, usually unfounded charges of racism are usually enough to cow most in to silence.  I guess I am just not most people and lately, once again, more people are starting to sound just like me.  Mass migration and multiculturalism have produced such severe problems that it is no longer taboo to discuss them.

We’re here to say that this dismissive attitude—and the general reluctance among policymakers to discuss the socio-economic impacts of mass migration—does a disservice to the many countries that have opened their arms to newcomers. But given recent episodes of crime, riots, and sexual violence, and given the sheer scale of the waves of immigrants now seeking refuge in Europe, we think Europe’s future lies in part with ensuring its cultural survival, which necessarily implies ending immigration.

Surveys, moreover, have repeatedly showed that a high proportion of young Moslems in France consider that the Sharia is a higher law than that of the Republic

IT has gotten so bad even politicians are speaking out.  This week British home secretary, Suella Braverman, shocked many with her speech in which she declared that multi-culturalism has failed.  What the media found so shocking was that Suella is of Indian descent and therefore should never question multi-culturalism because she is a shining example of multiculturalism.

There was a rather personal angle to their criticisms. ‘Remarkable to hear Braverman say multiculturalism has failed’, tweeted Times columnist Hugo Rifkind. ‘She’s a British home secretary descended from Goan Indians from Mauritius and Kenya, married to a Jewish husband, in a government headed by Britain’s first Hindu PM.

The media was shocked because the media is stupid.  They do not understand the difference between cultures and race; something the article author described as a schoolboy error.

They all, simultaneously, made the same schoolboy error – they conflated the fact of living in a diverse society, which almost no one has a problem with, with state multiculturalism, a policy pursued by successive Western governments which emphasizes cultural difference over common values

Suella is not a shining example of the success of multiculturalism.  She is a shining example of the success of assimilation.  Yes she is ethnically Indian but the point is she does not think of herself as Indian.  She thinks of herself as British and she is proud to be part of her adopted country.

I do not wish to heap praise on Suella because she is after all a politician.  This means odds are very high that she is a disgusting human being but in this case it is obvious.  Disgusting or not she is a Brit not an Indian and that is the way immigration is supposed to work.  Multiculturalism benefits politicians, assimilation benefits nations.

Liberals are always right, just ask them

There is a definite disconnect in the world that I don’t think will ever be solved.  At this point in our history there is no way to reach consensus on anything because the left will concede no ground.  According to the left even when they are wrong they are still right so presented with the same situation in the future they would repeat all of the same mistakes of the past.


According to that lunatic critical thinkers are only ever right by accident.  There is simply no way to analyze the data and come to a different conclusion than the experts even when the experts were horribly wrong.  We must never think for ourselves we must always trust the experts.

This guy is supposed to be a scientist himself yet somehow he is completely unaware of all of the times the scientific consensus was wrong.  At one time there was scientific consensus that

  • The sun revolved around the earth
  • Hysterectomies could be used to control emotional women
  • Lobotomies could cure mental illness

Consensus is not part of the scientific method and even if we choose to follow the experts, which experts do we follow?  There were plenty of experts warning against what we were doing.  Why didn’t we follow them?  According to Sam Harris we could not follow those experts because they had jumped to all the right conclusions for all the right reasons.  Instead according to Sam Harris the experts that we should follow are experts like Neil Ferguson who have an unblemished track record of being wrong every single time.

Neil Ferguson has never been right about anything in his life.  It is not just that he has been wrong it is that he has been spectacularly wrong.  No one should ever listen to Neil Ferguson about anything, yet the press continues to trot him out and present him as an expert.  We have discussed this before; the media loves fake experts like Neil Ferguson.  To the media an expert is someone who they can count on to make fantastic claims that fit their narrative.

We followed the consensus that politicians bought from dishonest and incompetent scientists like Neil Ferguson.  Government paid for these conclusions because they all led to the vaccines.  Or rather they all led to vaccine profits that were spread liberally among the government decision makers.

Unfortunately following the experts did not lead to just a confiscation of our wealth, we lost something far more valuable than wealth.  We lost our health.  The COVID vaccines are in fact the greatest crime in human history.  Since the advent of the jabs deaths and injuries have sky rocketed.  The numbers are simply getting to big to ignore and once we stop ignoring the problems anger will set in.


That “ridiculous” prediction of millions of deaths is absolutely correct.  Millions have died but the lunatic left like Sam Harris will never admit that they were wrong.  How can people co-exist when the left will not accept millions of deaths as proof that they were wrong?  The left is incapable of introspection or learning.  That means the next virus Fauci releases will provoke exactly the same response.  Millions of people will once again die unnecessarily.  And the left, once again won’t learn a damn thing.

Russia and China both know the West is all hat and no cattle

Volodymyr Zelensky made a brief stop in Canada this week and left with his usual bag of Canadian Taxpayer money.  The Canadian Media declines to say whether Trudeau took his usual cut before the money went in to the bag or if Zelensky wires him his share later.

It is a good thing for Zelensky that he can still count on Canada because the rest of the world is starting to change their position on unlimited handouts for the Ukraine.  Poland has just announced that the well is now dry.  There will be no more money for the Ukraine.

“Poland will no longer arm Ukraine to focus on its own defense,” Polish prime minister Mateusz Morawiecki announced just hours after Warsaw summoned Ukraine’s ambassador related to a fresh war of words and spat over blocked grain, according to the AFP. Warsaw has throughout more than a year-and-a-half of the Ukraine-Russia war been Kiev’s staunchest and most outspoken supporter.

Reality always intrudes.  Poland has finally realized that they cannot produce weapons as fast as the Ukraine is using them.  NATO is a paper tiger.  High tech weapons are an advantage in short wars against poorly supplied enemies.  They are useless in a protracted conflict because they take too much time and money to replace.  Protracted conflicts are won by the side that is able to build the most stuff. The west used to be very good at building things until corrupt, under-intelligent politicians signed agreements to offshore the production of everything.

In 1942, Admiral Chester Nimitz fought on the Midway Islands with only three aircraft carriers at his disposal. Less than three years later, he commenced operations against the Marianas with 15 new, larger, and faster carriers to feed into the fight. China has built a defense industry capable of such rapid production—but today, the United States couldn’t pull it off.

Most NATO nations are slowly coming to the same realization as Poland.  If they continue to support Ukraine soon everyone will understand how incredibly weak we are all thanks to greedy and short sighted politicians.  There is not a politician in the world that wants to forgo the lucrative kickbacks but laundering money through the Ukraine is becoming too dangerous.  Many have decided it is time to take the money and run.

You did not need to be a genius to predict how this would end.  I warned in April that we cannot defeat Russia.

To win a protracted war you need 2 things, a strong manufacturing base and a strong military.  The west has neither.  The US did not win World War 2 because they had the best military.  They won because they were able to produce more bullets, bombs, planes, and tanks than the Nazis.  For every one that was destroyed they built 2 more.  Germany’s superior military had no chance.

And then I repeated those warnings again in July.

The west cannot win a war against Russia because China will not allow it.  Large conflicts are won by the side that can produce the most weapons and China can produce a staggering number of weapons.

We wasted billions on a lost cause and Politicians are bailing before the public finds out.  If the public finally realizes how vulnerable these greedy idiots have made us it won’t end well for the politicians.  God I hope to live to see that day.

COVID and Climate Tyranny go hand and hand

British politicians have passed legislation that criminalizes non-adherence to net zero policies.

In fact, under this new legislation, those who fail to adhere to energy consumption regulations could face imprisonment for up to a year and fines of up to £15,000.

However, there are very real concerns that these amendments could lead to the criminalisation of individuals who do not comply with the new energy rules.

To comply with net zero policies you must do expensive renovations to your home.  If you refuse you will be fined.  If you simply cannot afford the renovations you will be imprisoned.  There is progress for you.  Britain is bringing back debtors prison.  I suppose you could sell your house to pay the fine.  I am sure the government would gladly buy your home so that they can give it to an illegal migrant.  Why have illegal migrants sleeping on the streets when it could be citizens, right?

This has nothing to do with climate and everything to do with making you poor.  They really do want you living in a mud hut and growing your own vegetables.  But, they are prepared to be magnanimous about it.  You can choose poverty or prison.  They don’t care.  Either way you will be completely under their control.

Why, you might ask, is Britain doing this to homeowners?  The simple answer is because they can.  British citizens let their government run over them during COVID.  No one had the balls to stand up and say no and now the government thinks they can do anything.

It’s this pandemic-style shift in power dynamics – this time using the Climate rather than Covid – which is the source of worry for many.

Complying with Tyranny always gets you more tyranny.  It is just a mask until it because home confiscation.  When you give these leftist tyrants an inch you will find that inch moved you far closer to mass graves than you could ever have imagined.

My posts could be sparse for the next 3 weeks.  I am quite tied up with work and travel.  Thank you all for showing up and reading.


Words not said

I have done multiple posts on the fraudulent nature of main stream climate science.  Climate scientists fold, spindle, and mutilate data in ways that make politicians envious.  But their deceitful nature does not always come from torturing lies out of data.  Sometime what they don’t say is just as big a lie as what they do say.  Sins of omission are still sins after all.

What climate scientists never do is present a full balanced picture.  They rail on about climate change making wildfires worse without ever mentioning 80% of fires are caused by humans.

In an article for The Free Press, Brown likened the approach to the way ‘the press focus so intently on climate change as the root cause’ of wildfires, including the recent devastating fires in Hawaii. He pointed out research that said 80 percent of wildfires are ignited by humans.

Taxing Carbon to lessen the impact of wildfires is a very inefficient.  You would get far better bang for your buck by educating stupid people and imprisoning evil ones.  But even if you could stop people from lighting fires a carbon tax is still not your next best option.  Better forest management practices would have far more impact than taxes.

This leads to a second unspoken rule in writing a successful climate paper: The authors should ignore — or at least downplay — practical actions that can counter the impact of climate change.

Climate will always change.  Adaptation is always a cheaper option than grand polices designed to affect the weather.  But, adaptation is never discussed is it?  Neither are the enormous benefits of fossil fuels.  Our modern society was only made possible by fossil fuels.  It is childish to think that we can eliminate fossil fuels and still maintain our current standard of living.

If people were given the complete picture no one would vote to do what our governments are doing.  Fossil fuels provide far more benefit than harm and there are solid strategies to mitigate any downside.  Eliminating fossil fuels is a remarkably stupid policy that only survives because too many incomes depend on a one-sided analysis.

To put it bluntly, climate science has become less about understanding the complexities of the world and more about serving as a kind of Cassandra, urgently warning the public about the dangers of climate change. However understandable this instinct may be, it distorts a great deal of climate science research, misinforms the public, and most importantly, makes practical solutions more difficult to achieve.

Climate scientists know they are lying by omission.  They only publish climate porn because real science won’t get published and will torpedo careers.  It is easy to produce a scientific consensus on anything.  Pay people to say what you want and punish anyone who steps out of line.  Can you spell “safe and effective”?

Quarantining healthy people was stupid and dishonest

In the spring of 2020 the western world in unison locked down.  The excuse we were given was that hospitals must be protected.  If we did not slow down the transmission of the virus hospitals would be overrun.  A few less trusting souls like me asked the obvious question.  How does quarantining healthy people have any effect on viral transmission?  There were 2 answers to that question.  The first was shut up and obey you racist misogynist.  When we did not accept that answer the next answer we got was asymptomatic transmission.  Everyone must wear a mask and isolate at home because anyone could be Typhoid Mary.

This was of course a lie and they knew it.  Asymptomatic transmission has never been a problem with any other virus and contact tracing proved that COVID asymptomatic transmission is a myth.

The authors combined the data from 54 different studies which included almost 78,000 people.  The studies determined how often an infected person infected someone else in their household.  They found that.

  • Your spouse is 2.25 times as dangerous as your child.

  • Symptomatic people infect someone else in the house 18% of the time.

  • Asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic people only infected someone else 0.7% of the time.

A similar study of pre-symptomatic transmission has recently been released.  This study did not trace to see if a pre-symptomatic person infected anyone else.  Instead they just compared the levels of viral shedding between pre-symptomatic and symptomatic people.  They found that pre-symptomatic people shed so little virus that pre-symptomatic transmission was unlikely.

The paper, published in the August issue of the journal The Lancet Microbe, found that infected people presymptomatically—that is before they developed symptoms—very rarely had the ability to infect others.

Taken together these 2 studies prove without a shadow of a doubt that it was all a lie.  Lockdowns, masks, and social distancing had little to no effect on viral transmission.  Placing restrictions on healthy people does nothing because healthy people do not spread the virus.  The only thing that needed to be done was to tell sick people to stay home, just as we have done in every cold and flu season prior to 2020.

None of this was about a virus.  It was all about eliminating rights and transferring wealth.  The people who did this are planning to do it again.  Do not succumb to fear again.  Do not let them place any restrictions on healthy people.

Climate fraud whack a mole

Dr. Willie Soon just published his paper showing how data homogenization was hiding the true cause of warming.  In a previous post I linked a video of Dr. Soon discussing his yet to be released paper.  Dr. Soon clearly points out in his presentation that data homogenization produces a warming trend that cannot be explained by sun activity. But, when homogenization is removed the warming is clearly caused by the sun and not greenhouse gases.  Essentially data homogenization is just a mathematical trick to justify using corrupted temperature data.

The release of the paper has caused quite a debate on twitter (or X if you prefer).  I weighed in on the debate pointing out that they know 90% of all temperature readings are corrupted by the Urban Heat Island effect.  The data should not be used but it is used because without it global warming is not that scary.  I made the comment that if only uncorrupted rural stations are used it shows little to no warming.  Within minutes an alarmist replied with this plot.

So it appears that I am wrong.  Don’t the rural stations show a lot of warming?  Actually, no they don’t, and I will tell you why.  Immediately I noticed a couple really odd things about this plot.  Below are the satellite temperatures from 1979.  According to satellites since 1979 the earth has warmed by about 0.6 degrees and the spike in 1998 due to a strong El Niño is roughly equivalent to the temperatures we see now.

Now let’s revisit the first plot.

According to this plot there has been a 0.5 degree increase since the 1998 El Nino and a 1.5 degree increase since 1979.  How can that be?  How does 0 become 0.5 and 0.6 become 1.5?  Well folks that is the magic of climate science.  If you don’t like the answer you get just adjust the data until you do.

I have shown this plot before.  The raw data shows no trend but the adjusted data shows a strong warming trend.  The plot my twitter friend was using for his gotcha moment is built from adjusted data.  To prove to me that I am wrong about corrupted data he sent me a plot composed completely of adjusted, corrupted, manufactured data.

That is the problem with trying to refute the climate lies.  Fraud is so widespread in climate science that there is always another completely fraudulent plot to fact check a different completely fraudulent plot.  It really is like playing whack a mole except that the number of fraudulent moles is almost infinite.

But why should it be a game of whack a mole at all?  Why is the burden of proof on the people who do not want to change anything?  Shouldn’t the burden of proof be on the people who want to destroy entire economies and make you poor?  And, when their proof turns out to be fraudulent, shouldn’t we stop listening to them?

Fraud is the underpinning of climate science.  We do not have an emergency.  We just have a few dishonest people making money and an army of useful idiots.  It is never a good idea to listen to con men or idiots.  Stop playing their stupid game.  Let’s move on from this fake government manufactured emergency and prepare for the next fake government manufactured emergency.

It is impossible to overestimate the evil that government is capable of

Officially 7 million people have died from COVID.  This number like everything else from government is a lie.  We know that many of these people died with COVID rather than from COVID.  Many more died of something far more deadly than COVID; government.

I was reminded of this again this morning when I found this article discussing a recently released study from Peru.  At the beginning of the pandemic, before the government blundered in and starting making medical decisions, Peruvian doctors were free to treat patients as they saw fit.  Some doctors were using Ivermectin while others were not.  Regions with high Ivermectin use had dramatically lower excess deaths than regions with low Ivermectin use.  Then when the government banned Ivermectin excess deaths soared.

Reductions in excess deaths over a period of 30 days after peak deaths averaged 74% in the 10 states with the most intensive IVM use. As determined across all 25 states, these reductions in excess deaths correlated closely with the extent of IVM use (p<0.002). During four months of IVM use in 2020, before a new president of Peru restricted its use, there was a 14-fold reduction in nationwide excess deaths and then a 13-fold increase in the two months following the restriction of IVM use. 

Multiple studies have shown this now.  Ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID.  This should not have surprised anyone.  Studies were available that showed Ivermectin was effective against the first SARS virus.  The opening assumption should have been that Ivermectin would work for any future SARS virus.  Ivermectin should have been distributed immediately to every doctor in the country but the opposite happened.  Ivermectin was banned and even destroyed.

Doctors using Ivermectin report up to 100% success when Ivermectin is started early enough.  7 million people died of a disease that should not have killed anyone.  So what killed them then; COVID or the government?  Without government interference COVID would have been a serious but treatable seasonal flu.  No one would have noticed that we had an emergency because we would not have had an emergency.  Government caused the whole damn thing.

When COVID first started many people around me were quite alarmed.  I told them that I expected it would be a non-event.  After all, doctors and nurses are not stupid.  They will quickly figure out the best way to treat COVID and they did.  What I did not anticipate was that the government would intervene and force them to watch their patients die.

Anyone who reads this blog will understand I am no fan of government.  When government gets involved I tend to expect the worst but even I did not expect this.  If in 2019 you told me that over the next 4 years governments would collude to kill millions of people I would not have believed yet that is exactly what happened.  Governments forced doctors to kill millions with ventilators and Remdesivir.  Then they killed millions more with vaccine mandates and the worst part is they are getting away with it.  Our current crop of politicians are mass murderers and not a single one of them has gone to prison.

COVID was a completely manufactured emergency that resulted in millions of unnecessary deaths.  The people who created the COVID disaster are busy creating another by restricting farming and making energy unaffordable.  When will we finally say enough?  How many more people must die before we put these tyrants where they belong?

Justin wants to bring diversity to you

Justin Trudeau is in trouble politically.  He is losing ground to his main political rival, Pierre Poilievre.  Poilievre has been exploiting 2 of Trudeau’s manufactured crises with Great success; cost of living and the housing crisis.  Poilievre’s message is simple he will reduce cost of living by eliminating the carbon tax and get houses built by incentivizing municipalities to streamline approvals.

These simple promises resonate with Canadians so Trudeau needs to show movement to win people back.  There is no way anyone named Trudeau will ever lower taxes so that leaves only housing.  Trudeau must pretend to do something to solve this problem he caused by unrestricted immigration.  Prime Minister Dress-up is very good at pretending so he took his new cabinet on a retreat so that they could all pretend to solve the housing crisis over expensive wine and food.

The retreat is now over and Canadian’s do not need to worry.  The Trudeau liberals have the solution.  Apparently the only way to provide more housing in one of the most sparsely populated countries in the world is to increase housing density.

“We see densification, we see proper partnerships with municipalities across provinces as being essential to do that (build more housing). And we don’t think that the only solution is to build on protected lands,” he said on Wednesday.

What a novel solution.  They are going to do exactly what I said they would do 8 weeks ago.

The goal of the housing crisis is high density housing inside existing residential neighborhoods.

High Density housing will be the only solution offered because it moves Canada closer to the WEF New world order.  It destroys home equity (you will own nothing remember) and it forces diversification whether you want it or not.  The Trudeau liberals even admitted as much.  High density housing inside existing residential neighborhoods is not really about housing.  It is about diversification and equity.

Whitzman said this has kept large groups, such as communities of colour, immigrants and non-traditional families, from being homeowners, since many of them can’t afford single-family homes within those zones, or at all.

According to the Trudeau liberals densification is the only solution because using all of the vacant land in this large vacant country would require cars and cars are icky.

And when it comes to designing cities around cars, he was blunt: “We have got to get the car out (of urban planning).”

Plus with all the car thefts in your newly diversified neighborhood you won’t want to own a car anyway.  Which is good because the liberals plan to make them unaffordable anyway.

Liberal policies have priced a lot of Canadians out of the housing market and now Liberal policies seem poised to price them out of the vehicle market, too.

What do you think?  Are you willing to sacrifice your home equity on the diversity alter?  Justin is staking his political future on his assumption that you do.