A cure worse than the disease

2 more studies of vaccine side effects were recently published.  Both studies are bad news for the vaccines and the vaccinated.  The first study tried to determine how long spike proteins are produced.  It turns out that the spike protein produced from vaccination is not identical to the spike protein on the virus.  This means you can tell the difference between spike proteins hanging around after a natural infection and the vax spike.

Researchers used this knowledge to determine how long your body will produce spike proteins after vaccination.  The results were very concerning.

It turns out that only the people in the vaccinated subgroup were found to carry vaccine-derived spike protein. What is worse, vaccine spike protein was found as late as six months after the last dose.

Sadly, Covid vaccines do not come with an ‘off’ switch, and there is no way to stop this persistent spike protein production.

It looks like some people may produce spike proteins indefinitely.  This is incredibly bad because the spike protein is a toxin and your immune system might learn to ignore it.  People who continually produce spike may develop chronic lifelong health issues.

While worrisome these finding are really not all that surprising.  mRNA jabs are ridiculously complex solutions to what should have been a simple problem.  The way they work there is no way to control what happens.

Complex solutions have too many moving parts and therefore too many things that can go wrong.  As Dr. Yeadon points out, with these treatments there is no way to control which cells produce spike proteins, how much they will produce, or how long they will produce for. 

The COVID vaccines were an incredibly bad idea.  Injecting everyone with a substance when you have absolutely no control what happens after the needle pierces skin is criminal.  The odds that things would go wrong were just way too high.  No one should have taken the jab but billions did and now millions have been injured.  Sadly some of the injured have been children and that brings us to the second study.

The second study concerned itself with how the jabs affected immune response in children.  You can find the study here, but it is very difficult to read.  An easy explanation can be found here.  Basically the researchers drew blood from vaccinated volunteers and then introduced various pathogens to see how the blood would react.  Blood from vaccinated children displayed a suppressed immune response.  No one knows how long this suppressed immune response will persist.  This could be a permanent condition.  Vaccinated children may suffer with a poor immune system for the rest of their vax shortened lives.

Crimes against children are the most heinous of all crimes and the Jabs are a crime.  Not a single healthy child died of COVID therefore the jabs offered zero benefit to children yet they still carried significant risk.  The risk reward balance for children and young people in general is highly negative.  This was apparent to anyone who was not an imbecile long before the first child was jabbed.

Would it be ethical to sacrifice 50 young men to prolong the lives of seniors?  You might think it is heartless to say we are trading one life for another but that is exactly what we are doing.  Worse we are doing it without any guarantee it will save anyone.  What we are doing is no different than throwing people into the volcano to appease the COVID gods.

The COVID jabs have failed completely.  They failed to prevent a single COVID death while causing immense damage.  People have died and may continue to die for years from excessive spike proteins and damaged immunity.  It is hard to imagine a way we could have made things any worse than we have.

CTV throws a life preserver to Justin Trudeau

Justin Trudeau’s popularity is falling.  I would like to say that his popularity is in free fall but this is Canada and Canadians are just not that smart.  A politician as obviously unintelligent as Justin who praises Chinese communists would poll at less to 10% in any sane country.  In Canada however Justin always managed to get around 30% which under the right conditions is enough to win in a parliamentary system.  Justin has now fallen to mid-20% so he really has not lost much support.  Justin’s real problem is that his main opponent Pierre Poilievre has been rising.

Recently Justin tried to turn this around by capturing the sympathy vote.  He announced his separation from his wife which really was a nonevent.  Anyone paying attention would note they appear to have separated about 4 years ago.  His wife, Sophie, agreed to continue periodic appearances in return for still living in luxury on the taxpayer’s dime. Their separation was announced now because Justin thought it could be used to his advantage.   Justin tried to milk the sympathy vote by presenting himself as a single parent and using his children as political props.

None of this worked and the party is quickly losing patience with Justin.  He must turn this around quick so he needs something before the party jettisons him.  It appears that Justin has decided to pin his hopes on Universal Basic income (UBI).  I know this because CTV told me.

In Canada the media and in particular CTV serve the liberal party.  When the Liberals want to sell something stupid they turn to media who then often turn to another liberal ally, Canadian academics.  That brings us to this morning and this CTV article.  CTV was highlighting a new Canadian study “proving” that homelessness can be solved by simply giving people money.  Normal people understand what an enormously bad idea this is but according to CTV and academia we are all wrong.  Homeless people will not waste the money they did not earn.

“They did not spend more money on alcohol or drugs, contrary to what people believe, and instead they spent the money on rent, food, housing, transit, furniture, a used car, clothes. It’s entirely the opposite of what people think they’re going to do with the money.”

In fact, according to CTV and academia, this small application of UBI was so successful the program needs to be expanded even beyond Canada’s borders.

Now that the study is complete, the plan is to replicate it and expand it to other cities in Canada and the U.S.

I know you must be a shocked as me to find out that when you give drug addicts money they don’t spend it on drugs.  That is certainly what CTV wants you to believe but there is a slight problem with that conclusion.  The study did not include drug addicts or the mentally ill who make up most of the homeless population.

The study did not include people who are street-entrenched or who have serious addictions or mental health issues, Zhao noted, adding people who fit that criteria do not make up the majority of homeless people.

The gas lighting by Canadian academia continues.  They carefully selected their subjects to get the answer the liberals paid for.  I bet the researchers were just happy that for once they did not need to prostitute themselves for climate change.  The net result is however the same.  This is fraudulent research done solely to support a political candidate and ideology.

Trudeau is using the media to get Canadian’s accustomed to the idea of UBI before he announces it.  Canadians are about to get UBI not because it works or because we can afford it.  UBI is coming because a struggling corrupt politician is running out of options.