Climate alarmism wants no debate, or science for that matter
The UN is demanding the right to appoint people who will chose and implement climate policies for the world. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is a UN committee that regularly meets to publish political reports dressed up as science. These works of fiction are compiled by lead authors who now demand the right to rule over sovereign nations.
“Five lead authors of IPCC reports” insisted “that scientists should be given the right to make policy prescriptions and, potentially, to oversee their implementation by the 195 states signed up to the U.N. framework convention on climate change,”
In a perverse way this would be a step up in how our governments currently operate. At least we would know who our politicians are taking their orders from. Currently we have to guess who our leaders take their direction from. The only thing we can know for certain is that leaders like Trudeau and Biden definitely do not take their direction from their countries citizens.
While this new system would certainly make politics more transparent the real goal is to make climate science even more opaque. Climate science works better without science. It is most effective when we just do what we are told. We should just accept our 15 minute prison sentences without asking why the data does not show much of a link between CO2 and global temperatures.
This plot basically says everything you need to know about the relative impact CO2 has on global temperatures. The theory and the models say that every molecule of CO2 added to the atmosphere will cause warming yet when we look at the data that is not what happens. This plot clearly shows CO2 concentrations rising for more than 1000 years while the temperature is stable. Then the temperature falls dramatically while CO2 concentrations continue to rise.
According to the theory and the models this this could never happen yet it did happen. The theory and the models are obviously wrong. CO2 does not drive global temperatures. In fact when you look at a more granular level the opposite is true. Rising temperatures often cause increasing CO2 concentrations.
All evidence resulting from the analyses suggests a unidirectional, potentially causal link with T as the cause and [CO2] as the effect. That link is not represented in climate models, whose outputs are also examined using the same framework, resulting in a link opposite the one found when the real measurements are used.
Climate alarmism is based on fraudulent science. A handful of sociopaths like the lead IPCC authors and Canada’s Prime Minister want to use this fraud to make your life miserable. They have enlisted an army of useful idiots to shout anyone down who points out just how incredible fraudulent the movement is. Don’t let them intimidate you in to silence. Speak up; the climate emperors have no clothes.
