Pfizer admits that the FDA knew the vaccine trials were Fraudulent.

Apparently Moderna is suing Pfizer over patent infringement.  This is a more than a little ironic since Moderna got around Robert Malone’s mRNA patent by changing one chemical that may have made the shots more dangerous.  Pfizer’s crime (in this case) was not being as good at patent infringement as Moderna.

When I saw this article I was surprised to find out someone could sue Pfizer after the government granted them legal immunity.  I was even more surprised this morning when I discovered this is not the only lawsuit Pfizer is facing over the vax.  It turns out, in the US, you cannot sue Pfizer for causing injuries but you can sue them if they received a government contract through corruption.  The plaintiffs allege the contracts are corrupt because the Pfizer vaccine trials were fraudulent.

Have you heard about this lawsuit in the news?  I certainly haven’t.  You would think that journalists would be very interested in allegations of government corruption but as with all things COVID the media is quite blind.  The suit has been going on long enough that the plaintiffs are already addressing Pfizer’s response to the original complaint.

Pfizer’s (the respondent) defense is brazen.  Pfizer admits that the vaccine trials were fraudulent but that there was no corruption because the government knew the trials were fraudulent and signed the contracts anyway.

Respondents seek dismissal without discovery, amendment, or trial. Their fundamental premise: even if honestly reported data showed their product caused more illness than it cured, inflicted more injury than it prevented, and took more lives than it saved, America’s military would still have given them billions of dollars and mandated it be injected into America’s military. Respondents claim fraudulent certifications, false statements, doctored data, contaminated clinical trials, and firing of whistleblowers can be ignored based on the theory that they contracted their way around the fraud.

So the contracts are not corrupt if the government is aware of, and participates in the corruption.  Doesn’t this apply to just about everything government does?  Pfizer needs the Epstein lawyer turned judge who signed the Mar-a-Lago search warrant, to win with this argument.