I have been skeptical of the vaccines since the first roll out.  My skepticism was fueled by what I already knew about vaccines.

1. Despite decades of research there has never been a successful coronavirus vaccine.
2. There has never been a successful vaccine for any RNA virus.
3. The mRNA vaccines had a perfect track record of failure in animal trials.

I just could not see how all of these obstacles could be overcome in a few short months when so many smart people had been stymied for so long.  I am not in a high risk group for COVID so I had no compelling reason to take a treatment that I was 90% sure would not work.  My decision was to wait and see what happens.

My plan was to wait a year and watch the data.   I have always been a data junkie and base my decisions on what the data says.  This puts me in stark contrast with most people who base their decisions on what the media and government tells them.  For the life of me, I will never understand why so many people follow the advice of proven liars.

My wife is not the data junkie that I am.  For the last year I have been showing her data and she was always skeptical of my analysis.  Every time I update or find new data I show her the trend that was always going the wrong direction.  My wife is not good at extrapolating trends she is more attuned to the here and now rather than a possible future.  She would always point out that she knew many people that had taken the vaccine and did not have a problem.

My wife is 100% correct many people have taken the jabs without any obvious ill effects.  That’s what makes the jabs so pernicious; some of the problems take a long time to develop.  That’s why it is so important to monitor the trends, something most people are not good at.  A year ago it was already obvious from the trends that these Jabs were not working and were harmful but it is a long road between the trend and the ultimate result.

We are now nearing the end of the road and people are starting to notice.  The Jabs have not worked as advertised.  People with multiple boosters are catching and dying from COVID more frequently than unvaccinated.  Less intelligent countries like Canada are still pushing the Jabs but much of the world is waking up.  For more than a year it has been taboo to say anything negative about the vaccines but that is changing.  Last night Tucker Carlson scorched the jabs in his opening monolog.

Also over the last couple of weeks Christine Anderson has given multiple interviews where she repeated the charge that COVID vaccines are the largest crime in history.  The trends told me that almost a year ago.

It is no longer necessary to extrapolate trends.  Almost everyone knows someone who has suffered a serious vaccine injury.  At this point anyone still advocating for these jabs is aiding and abetting the largest crime in history.

Here we go again.  Masks are making a comeback.  LA County is recommending masks again and Germany is considering masks for the winter.  Masks never completely disappeared in Canada.  Masks are still required in airports and on planes.  Governments and COVIDiots just love masks despite the fact that masks have not worked anywhere.   You cannot find a mask mandating jurisdiction that managed to reduce COVID infections.  When mask mandates are lifted there is never a surge in infections.  Masks don’t work because the engineering does not work.

The graphic below shows that masks have not worked because droplets that you exhale and virus itself are just too small.

Take a look at the red part of the arrow for particles less than 1 micron.  During normal respiration almost 100% of the droplets you exhale are less than 1 micron.  Cloth and surgical masks do absolutely nothing to particles of this size.  The weave openings are more than one order of magnitude larger than 1 micron.

60% of exhaled droplets are smaller than 0.3 micron.  0.3 micron is the test size for an N95 mask.  An N95 mask will filter out 95% of 0.3 micron particles.  So theoretically an N95 mask could offer some protection to others.  If you are infected your mask would significantly reduce the amount of viruses you expel when breathing as long as the mask seals firmly on your face, which it does not.  Anyone who has worn an N95 mask will tell you that it lifts away from your face every time you exhale.  An N95 mask does not catch many exhaled particles of any size because most of your exhaled breath goes around rather than through the mask.

The idea that you are wearing your mask to protect others is ludicrous.  An N95 mask is like a face shield it just redirects your breath it does not prevent you from spreading a virus.  An N95 mask does provide some protection for the person wearing it, although not as much as you think.  When the virus is exhaled it is encased in a fine water droplet.  That droplet quickly evaporates leaving the virus completely disassociated.  The virus without the droplet is only about 0.1 micron an N95 mask is rated for particles 3 times larger than that.  I looked for but could not find anything to tell me how effective the N95 masks are for particles of 0.1 micron.  I did find that N95 masks catches 99% of 1.0 micron particles.  So 1 micron is 99% effective and 0.3 micron is 95% effective, as with all filters it is not linear; as the particle gets smaller the amount caught drops exponentially.  All I can tell you is that the mask will stop somewhere between 0 and 95% of particles as small as 0.1 micron.

N95 Masks offer partial protection to the user but no protection to anyone else.  This makes mask mandates the same a vaccine mandates.  There is no public health benefit to a mask or the jabs because neither prevents transmission.  Similar to the Vaccines the partial protection from constantly wearing an N95 mask comes at a very high cost.  N95 masks are a very effective breathing barrier.  It is very difficult to breathe while wearing one and if worn for extended periods can cause a condition called hypoxia.  Hypoxia is a lack of oxygen.  It causes serious health problems up to and including death.  That is a high price to pay to prevent a disease that has mutated in to a cold.

A scorching hot apocalypse@FatEmperor @CharlotteEmmaUK @thecoastguy @LeAdderNoire @LeilaniDowding @JamesMelville @BernieSpofforth @ZubyMusic @RealEddieHobbs @djlange @OzraeliAvi @emmakennytv @IrishInquiry @SoniaPoulton @kezia_noble @TheFreds @MattWalshBlog @matthewdmarsden pic.twitter.com/1N7NQlCIiZ

— Doctor Dr McHonk-Honk (@TheEyes2022) July 20, 2022

I saw this headline this morning.

11 people “mysteriously” dropped dead in Italy in a single day.  This is of course not a mystery to anyone who is not an idiot.  You will never hear me argue that government is not stocked full of idiots but even they know what is causing this.  It is not a coincidence now that children are getting vaccinated child blood thinners get approved and defibrillators get place in elementary schools.

The media is still helping government hide what is going on.  The guardian article justifies the defibrillators by letting us know a child died of a heart attack 12 years ago at a school event.  So a single death 12 years ago is the reason to put a defibrillator in every elementary school ASAP.  That is if 12 years later can be considered ASAP.  The Media think we are fools and we have given them no reason to believe otherwise.  What kind of a parent gives their child an experimental vaccine for a disease that poses no threat to their child?  We may as all wear kick me signs on our backs.

COVID deaths are still low but they are rising slowly in many countries.  It could be a statistical blip or recording issue but Canada is showing higher COVID deaths in July than we had in the peak of winter.  Canada and other northern countries should have no COVID deaths in the summer.  The sudden deaths and off season COVID deaths are all really vaccine deaths.  Had we done nothing in March 2020 COVID would be over and none of this would have happened.  Instead governments, true to form, blundered in and made it worse.

Random testing has returned to Canadian airports and mask mandates are back in Los Angeles.  The COVID restrictions are slowly returning because no one in government is smart enough to learn from their past mistakes.  Will we be foolish enough to play along with this madness again?

Canadian’s are mindlessly delusional.  Every day the gulf between what Canada is and what Canadians think it is grows wider.  For more than 2 years Canadians have watched idly while a prime minister elected with 32% of the vote violated every section of the Charter of rights.  Incredibly, none of this registers with the average Canadian.  The overwhelming majority of Canadians who acquiesced to this tyranny would describe Canada as a beacon of democracy, an example for others to follow.

The largest delusions that Canadians hold are about health care.  Canadian’s believe that our socialized health care system is superior to all others and that Healthcare is a human right.  This recent decision from an Alberta Judge just shattered that delusion.  An Alberta woman was denied an organ transplant because she is not vaccinated.  The judge ruled Alberta Health Services could deny her because health care is not a right.

I cannot wait for the next time a useful idiot tells me about how superior Canadians and the Canadian health care system is.  What kind of mental gymnastics will it take to justify this?  Our superior system did not just stand by and watch this woman die.  The system ensured her death by denying her “right” to health care.

It might surprise you but I think the judge actually made the right decision.  This judge did something that is exceptionally rare in the Canadian judicial system; he followed the letter of the law.  Health care is obviously not a right.  Nothing that has to be provided to you by others can ever be a right.  If products and services were rights then the people producing them would have no choice but to provide them to you.  In essence the providers would be your slaves.  You cannot have a right that violates the basic human rights of others.

Health care is a service.  Socialized health care is a privilege of living in a wealthy country.  Unfortunately it is a privilege that government can deny at any time for non-compliance.  I do not have a problem with this Judge.  My problem is with our premier and Alberta Health Services.  Jason Kenney is an evil little prick who is going to kill this woman to make an example out of her.  How does murdering a person to frighten others in to compliance make Canada a beacon of democracy?

Canadian’s like to see themselves as the world’s Teddy bear.  We are just so caring and compassionate.  Except of course that we are not.  I know this because very few people are upset by this woman’s public execution at the hands of our premier.  Canadian’s are largely left wing and to paraphrase Ronald Reagan; the problem with the left is that they know so much that just is not so.  Canadian’s are absolutely sure of their saintly compassion as they watch this woman die.

To any Albertan who is not a lunatic, there is a way to protest this AHS decision.  If you are an organ donor follow this link to withdraw your consent.  You must enter information from your health care card and then on the second screen click withdraw.

https://myhealth.alberta.ca/Pages/OTDRRegister.aspx

If enough people withdraw their consent AHS might be forced to change their decision before this poor woman dies.

Sri Lankans are impoverished and starving because their government banned nitrogen based fertilizer.  Dutch farmers are now protesting similar regulations.  Most western countries including Canada are considering restrictions on nitrogen fertilizer.  It is obvious what happens when you restrict nitrogen fertilizers; crop yields plummet.  So that is the cost, what is the benefit?

I did an internet search to find the reasoning for the restrictions and was surprised to find it was concerns over nitrogen oxides.  This surprised me because nitrogen is quite stable and only oxidizes at very high temperatures; like those found inside engines.  In my industry we have been dealing with NOx regulations for years.  We need to carefully control our fuel air ratios to minimize nitrogen oxides.  I never questioned these regulations before I just thought it was one more useless thing government forced us to do.  Now that people are starving I think it is time to ask questions.

If it takes high temperatures to form NOx how is fertilizer a problem?  I searched for information but all I found was government and environmental organizations claiming 25% of NOx emissions come from fertilizer.  This is hard to believe but they had a convoluted mechanism that somehow caused this at low temperatures.  I could not find the research behind this so like most environmental claims it is probably bullshit.

To be fair NOx concentrations have been rising and fertilizer could be part of this but let’s keep this in perspective.  The concentration is 330 parts per BILLION more than 1000 times less than the other environmental boogie man CO2.  For those of you keeping score that means the air you breath is now .000033% nitrogen oxides.

Let’s be crazy and believe for once the environmentalists are not lying and fertilizer accounts for 25% of this.  How much of a problem is 330 PPB NOx.  My quick internet search told me some forms of NOx are greenhouse gases while other forms counteract the effect of greenhouse gases.  Doesn’t seem to be much of a problem to me especially when you consider a warm earth is better for life than a cold earth.  The climate cult disputes this but history is clear; warm times are good times for humans.

So nitrogen Oxides may warm or cool the planet.  I hope it is warm but either way it is not much of a problem.  This hardly seems like a reason to starve people so I kept searching.  Next I found that higher NOx concentrations are linked with increased asthma.  I tried to find out how strong the link was but the best I could find was this.

Childhood exposure to nitrogen oxides (NOx) is considered a risk factor for the onset of asthma. 

That is not a very strong statement.  They found higher asthma in areas with higher NOx.  The problem is that these areas also had higher concentrations of other chemicals thought to be linked with asthma.  That is the problem with asthma no one really knows what causes it.

Again let’s give the environmentalist the benefit of the doubt.  Despite the fact that they are habitual liars I will give them this one.  Nitrogen fertilizer will cause NOx and NOx will cause asthma.  So there it is; we can prevent asthma by restricting fertilizer.  Clear cut as this is I still have a problem with it.  When crop yields fall food will become very expensive.  Rich children will still eat while poor children will starve.  We are killing poor children so that rich children can breathe easily.  Am I the only one who finds this obscene?