Canada prioritizes Climate Change over Nuclear Armageddon
The world is marching towards war. Western politicians are determined to put boots on the ground in the Ukraine. None of these “leaders” seem to be concerned about declaring war on the country that has the world’s largest stockpile of nuclear weapons. Their stupidity is stunning.
Chrystia Freeland is Canada’s deputy prime minister and finance minister. That makes her the second most powerful politician in Canada and Justin Trudeau’s heir apparent. Chrystia also supports war with Russia. She doesn’t think it will be a big deal because climate change is so much more dangerous than nuclear war. In fact she thinks attacking Russia will be very beneficial since we can use it as an excuse to get rid of oil.
“Friend-shoring must be green,” Freeland said. “The curse of oil is real and so is the dependence of many countries on the world’s petro-tyrants. Friend-shoring can defend liberal democracies and help preserve the planet, if one of our objectives is to speed up the green transition.”
The article is written by John Ivison. I have written about John before. He is one of the least intelligent most dedicated branch COVIDian’s in the country. John has proved that he is not that bright and even he knows that Freeland is bat shit crazy.
Cutting greenhouse gas emissions is a good and necessary thing. But it is astonishing that Freeland could quote Leon Trotsky saying: “You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you” and then conclude that the preeminent threat is climate change.
The person most likely to succeed Justin Trudeau thinks that the imaginary problem of greenhouse gasses is more dangerous than nuclear Armageddon. Make no mistake about it Anthropogenic greenhouse gas warming is a very imaginary problem. I have written about this before. There really is not much energy CO2 can capture so it does not take much CO2 to capture it all. Beyond about 300 ppm CO2 has done most of the warming that it can do. CO2 cannot capture energy that is not there. That is why higher concentrations have made very little difference in the past.
Tom Harris correctly points out that the data has never supported the theory. There is no positive feedback loop from water vapor that enhances the effect of CO2. If this were the case the climate would be chaotically unstable. The earth would have burned up billions of years before humans ever stepped foot on it.
Human induced Climate change is one of the most ridiculous theories ever proposed and Canada sees nuclear war as a great opportunity to address this imaginary problem. Canada is screwed. At this point I don’t believe it can be fixed.
