How do you get Emergency Use Authorization when there is no Emergency?

The FDA just gave emergency use authorization to Moderna for Child boosters.  Moderna can now inject children 6 and older without fear of legal repercussions.  After 3 years of the pandemic and nearly 2 years of vaccinations how can this happen?  Where is the emergency?  COVID was never really an emergency even for adults.  Children are even less susceptible to COVID than Adults.  There is no way you can argue that we have an emergency that requires injecting children.

This week Pfizer finally admitted the obvious; there is no evidence that the jabs prevent infection or disease.  That admission destroys the often used argument children need to be injected to prevent transmission.  That argument was disgusting even without this new admission.  Children do not have a responsibility to protect adults.  Any adult who argued children should be exposed to risk, essentially used as shields, to protect adults, has no redeeming qualities as a human being.

The people who issued this approval should be ashamed of themselves.  Unfortunately the FDA is staffed full of people who know no shame; largely because they are clueless.  FDA Peter Marks (M.D. Ph.D.) highlighted that cluelessness with his statement in the official press release.  His statement is possibly the most nonsensical statement ever uttered about COVID vaccinations.  That says a lot when you consider the volume of nonsense western media has already issued about COVID vaccinations.  I guess that is what you need a PHD for; so that you can exceed the stupidity of the average journalist.  Below is his statement.

“While it has largely been the case that COVID-19 tends to be less severe in children than adults, as the various waves of COVID-19 have occurred, more children have gotten sick with the disease and have been hospitalized. Children may also experience long-term effects, even following initially mild disease. 

Peter has packed so much crazy in one statement I must unpack it one piece at a time.  The organization that Peter works for just gave emergency use authorization which implies that an emergency exists.  Someone should have explained that to Peter because the first line of his statement refutes the emergency, “COVID-19 tends to be less severe in children”.  How is a mild disease an emergency?

Peter then goes on to explain that this mild disease is still an emergency because the longer it goes the more children who get sick and hospitalized.  Are we supposed to believe that without COVID no child would ever be sick and hospitalized, or that now any time a child gets hospitalized we have an emergency that requires injecting every child with untested chemicals?

The last part of Peter’s statement is the cherry on top of the excrement Sunday he just served up.  We need to worry about unknown long term effects of even mild disease but we don’t need to worry about unknown long term effects of the vaccine.  That would be illogical even if the vaccine worked.  It is downright stupid when you consider the vaccines do not prevent mild disease.   So to protect children from possible long term effects of mild disease we must expose them to the short and long term risks of a treatment that does not prevent mild disease.

This is the kind of reasoning being used to push a treatment on children that they do not need; a treatment that seems to have increased rather than decreased the number of Child COVID deaths.

History will not forgive us for what we are doing.