Following Scientists who don’t follow Science

Senator Rand Paul is one of the few politicians determined to hold people accountable for the fiasco that was COVID.  Paul has set his sights on Anthony Fauci and has been releasing emails Fauci shared with his henchmen.  I found this release interesting. Because it demonstrates just how little the “scientists” in Fauci’s inner circle actual care about science.

So, studies show high levels of seroprevalence meaning that a high percentage of people have already been exposed to COVID and have immunity.  Those studies would have been very problematic to Fauci’s Lockdown until you accept the jab policy.  But science was ignored because Fauci’s inner circle BELIEVED something else that they had no data to substantiate.

Did you catch that.  Sweden had the same results without locking down.  But again, that doesn’t matter because Fauci’s minions BELIEVED that Sweden did lockdown.

And here we have it.  The solid scientific evidence of asymptomatic transmission.  30 to 60% of asymptomatic people had high levels of the virus in their nasal swabs.  On one hand contact tracing showed that asymptomatic people do not transmit the virus. On the other hand, the swabs suggest it COULD happen even though it clearly was not happening.  Why take real data when you can hang your hat on could?

When the media and government were urging people to “follow the science” what they really meant was that you were to follow the scientist.  But not just any scientist.  You were only to follow scientists that said what the government wanted them to say.  And every one of the governments endorsed scientists were not at all concerned with science.  All they talked about was what COULD happen or what they BELIEVED was happening.  Evidence be damned.