Yesterday I posted about the province of Ontario intentionally manipulating data to show vaccine efficacy where none existed.  The very fact that the manipulations was done in real time and not after the fact proves they knew the vaccines were neither safe nor effective.  That has been a common theme throughout COVID.  There were no mistakes.  It was all very intentional.  Everyone in charge knew what they were doing was wrong, but they did it anyway in pursuit of profits.

Ok, the last part of that I can’t prove largely because there have been no investigations.  I do not know if anyone other than the pharmaceutical companies turned a profit but again, I am ever a slave to logic and there is no more logical explanation.  Why would people in the FDA approve of a treatment that they were not willing to take themselves?

Dr. Sara Brenner – now the Principal Deputy Commissioner (literally the #2 person running the entire FDA in 2025) – admitted years ago:
“I personally did not take the COVID vaccine due to my own health risk assessment… and everything I’ve seen

People do things for love or money, and I can guarantee you no one in the government loves you.  That really only leaves one option then, doesn’t it?  Sadly, COVID was not a one off.  Now that politicians and bureaucrats have had a taste for the profits they are not about to stop.  Another mRNA injection was just approved after Pfizer produced another fraudulent trial.

Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) posted at 11:41 AM on Wed, Nov 26, 2025:
New Substack, on Pfizer’s missing (and failed) mRNA flu vaccine trial

This will not stop until we stop it.  These people need to face justice.  They are monumental thieves with a depraved indifference to the suffering of others.  How much longer will you let these sociopaths have the power of life and death over you?

Alberta Premier Dannielle Smith signed a memorandum of understanding with Mark Carney.  Smith is desperately trying to spin this as a win, but it is the exact opposite.  Alberta has agreed to increase carbon taxes to $135/tonne from the existing $95/tonne and implement carbon capture technology.  Ottawa has agreed to not put a cap on oil field emissions and allow Alberta to apply for a pipeline.

This might sound reasonable, but it is not.  Smith has committed to making life expensive for Albertans.  Carney promised nothing.  The emissions cap does not exist now so he promised not to do something in the future which will be unnecessary anyway.  The higher carbon tax and expense of carbon capture will curtail future production as much as the cap would have anyway.  And, as for the pipeline, being allowed to apply for a permit is not the same as being granted a permit.  Carney has been clear no new pipelines will be approved unless it meets his conditions.  The same conditions that were used to kill several previous pipeline projects.

No new pipelines will result from this agreement, which is a shame because Alberta could really use a pipeline to the west coast.  Currently Alberta sells oil to some Canadian provinces and the United States.  Having only one external customer is a problem.  Most of Alberta’s production has no choice but to go to the United States.  Buyers in the States know they have Alberta producers over a barrel and under pay for Canadian oil.

This new MOU will ensure that the US can continue to buy discounted Canadian crude until the higher costs agreed to by Smith kill the Alberta oil industry, and every other industry in the province for that matter.  This was not a win.  It was an unconditional surrender.  Smith promised to cooperate with the federal government’s lunatic climate agenda and got absolutely nothing in return.

Until COVID very few people questioned the vaccine narrative.  I certainly didn’t.  Looking back, I find that quite incredible.  The vaccine narrative should have been questioned for one simple reason.  If it sounds too good to be true, it likely isn’t true.

By that I mean vaccines were always sold as a panacea.  A cure for everything with no downside.  Even after vaccine manufacturers begged for legal liability protection over vaccine injuries no one questioned their safety.  Big pharma admitted their products were harming many people, yet the narrative never changed until now.  COVID opened a door that vax advocates like Neil Stone are desperately trying to close.

Neil Stone is one of the more aggressive vax advocates on X.  He touts the benefits of vaccinations and denies any downside.  I don’t know if Neil Stone believes the things he says.  He claims to have treated multiple Tetanus patients.  The UK has less than 10 tetanus cases per year and more than 329,000 doctors.  It is unlikely that Neil Stone has ever seen a case of Tetanus.  But maybe he has and maybe he is not a liar.  It is possible he believes everything he has written.  That doesn’t mean he is right though.

With respect to measles he does not appear to be correct at all.  A new study shows that the measles vaccine is not safer than measles.  Just not in the way that you might expect.

A 20 yr Japanese study of 100 000 people showed those who had measles had –
• 20% less cardiovascular deaths
• 66% less lymphoma
• 50 % less ovarian

I call this the law of unintended consequences.  I see it all the time at work.  Many times, we solve a problem only to find our solution has other detrimental effects.  Sometimes the side effects are worse than the original problem.  That in a nutshell is the problem with the vaccine narrative.  It is based on 2 assumptions.

1. If disease prevalence gets better, it is due to the vaccine.
2. Any side effects are inconsequential.

No one has ever proven the second assumption largely because no one has bothered to look.  No one has done a double-blind placebo study of any vaccine.  We don’t even know that a single vaccine is safe, so how do we know giving multiple vaccines at the same time is safe?  The answer is that we don’t know if what we are doing to children is safe.

Vaccines have been credited with eradicating many diseases.  That might even be true; but at what cost?

Yesterday I posted about how people still won’t believe their own eyes and ears when it comes to COVID vaccine injuries.  They don’t just deny the existence of vaccine injuries they go so far as to mock anyone who claims to be injured.  It is sad that they mock people who have had their lives destroyed.

The serious neurological damage that occurred one week after the administration of the second dose of the Covid vaccine cannot be a coincidence, nor can it be explained by a pre-existing autoimmune pathology. The Tribunal of Asti has thus recognised the causal link between the Covid vaccination and a very serious health impairment, transverse myelitis, which affected a 52-year-old woman, who was unable to walk independently at the time of the vaccination.

We do live in an age of lies.  For as long as there have been governments there have been lies, but our modern internet society is the age of instant, unending lies.  So, I get it.  It is not easy to tell lies from the truth.  That is why I look for information that might lead to or hint at the truth.  This is no easy task because governments are very good at using multiple sources to dress lies as truth.  The important thing is to look for data that the government can’t lie about.

For instance, the number of COVID deaths is a completely fictional number.  The government can pick and choose how they classify a death.  The thing they can’t lie about is the actual number of deaths.  That makes deaths from all causes a powerful data point.  If it doesn’t change you have no problem.  If it is elevated, you have a problem.  It does not matter how many times the government pretends you don’t have a problem.  The number of deaths exposes lies.  And Houston, we definitely have a problem.

I have pointed out on this blog many times that too many people are dying.  We have not gone back to our well-established pre-Jab trends. I pointed this out a few weeks ago to another person mocking me for stating the jabs are not dangerous.  Their response was to point out that there isn’t anything to say that it was the jabs.  Then what else could it be?  What other single factor affected billions of people in hundreds of countries?

When I asked that question in the past the only answer I got from jab advocates was that it was COVID.  COVID affected the whole world.  Except that it didn’t.  Math says it didn’t, and I trust math over willfully blind government advocates every day of the week.

Officially there were 779 million confirmed COVID cases in the world.  That sounds like a lot, but it is only 9.8% of the population and that number is also way too high.  This is confirmed cases and vaccinated people were sometimes infected multiple times.  Also, a German study has confirmed what I have been saying for years on this blog.  The PCR test is prone to false positives.  According to the study only 14% of confirmed COVID cases were actual infections.

This means that less than 1.37% of people were affected by covid but 70.7% of people took the COVID Jabs.  I know the government and their army of useful idiots hate it when I do this but let’s just for a moment apply some logic.  Do you think the excess deaths are caused by 1% of people being infected or 71% being vaccinated?

It is obvious what is going on even if people don’t want to hear it.

I started this blog because I was alarmed by what governments were doing in the name of public health.  Originally, I thought COVID was just stupid people doing stupid things out of fear.  By the time I started the blog I had come to admit that malice had a lot more to do with it than stupidity.  Although with government, stupidity is always a significant factor.

So, what this blog became was my comments on government tyranny that was by no means confined to COVID.  COVID was just the most blatant example.  Sadly, governments do evil things all the time and if I judge by impacts on my own life COVID is not even the worst thing the Canadian government has done.  To me the worst thing my government has ever done was to steal my children’s future.

I hesitate to say I grew up poor.  I always had clothes, food, and a roof over my head.  But describing us as even lower middle class would be generous.  My father gave me what he could, which was more than what his father had been able to give him.  Now my brothers and I have all been able to build lives and have even more than our father had.  Canada was a country where every generation had more than the last.

That Canada was a great country.  It fills me with great sadness to understand that country no longer exists.  The sadness turns to anger when I think about what that means for my children.  They will be the first generation that will have less than their parents.

Their key measure of immobility, which shows how tightly a child’s income rank in their late 20s and early 30s correlates with their parents’, increased by 21 percent from 0.202 to 0.245 between the 1963 and 1985 cohorts. For early Millennials born in the early 1980s, parental income became more determinative of outcomes compared to Boomers and Gen-Xers. The bulk of the mobility deterioration occurred for children born between 1970 and 1975, with continued erosion for those born through the mid-1980s.

The data reveals a critical pattern: The system’s greatest failure isn’t that the poor can’t reach the top; it’s that they increasingly can’t reach the middle.

That is from very good essay that you can find here.  The essay goes on to discuss many of the reasons, but all the reasons have the same root cause, poor government.  Canada has everything it needs to be great except the most important thing, good governance.  We have a country that should not have a care in the world.  Instead, we have a country full of problems.  The worst part is that I cannot think of a single problem we have that was not caused by a combination of government incompetence and malfeasance.

I wrote this post on Remembrance Day after watching the ceremony.  What struck me was how old most people were who took part in the ceremony.  It was people my age clinging to the memory of what Canada once was.  In a way it is a curse to be old enough to remember what Canada was and what it could have been.  It should have been much better than this.  My children deserve the chance to do better than me.  Politicians stole that from them.  Could there be anything more evil than that?