Choosing dead babies

A few weeks ago, we were having dinner with friends.  Our friends, like us, declined the COVID jabs and when we meet it is difficult for the conversation not to stray back about the truly evil things government during COVID.  The pinnacle of the evil was the vaccine mandates and our discussion meandered into vaccines in general.

At one point in the conversation, I made the comment that Japan stopped vaccinating infants and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) disappeared.  One of our friends found this interesting and immediately used google AI to search for it.  Google AI called me a liar and pointed out that Japan’s early vaccination schedule was not substantially different from America’s.

I was surprised by this answer because I had seen data to the contrary so later, I did my own internet searching.  This is what I found.

Japan’s approach to vaccination has been notably cautious, until recently. After incidents linked to adverse reactions, including a temporary suspension of the MMR vaccine in the 1990s, Japan adopted a more conservative schedule for many years. Key differences included:

Most vaccines started later, typically around six months of age, allowing for greater immune system development.
Combining vaccines was less common, reducing the risk of overwhelming the immune system.

A 2018 study in Pediatrics International found that Japan’s slower, more selective approach correlates with lower rates of severe vaccine reactions compared to countries with more aggressive schedules. In recent years, however, the Japanese recommended schedule has expanded greatly and is now similar to the U.S. policy.

Google told my friend a half-truth.  Japan has only recently gone back to vaccinating infants.  For decades their policy was to not vaccinate until 6 months but since 2024 they have fallen in line with other developed countries.  I wanted to see if there was any data to show what has happened to SIDS in Japan with this change.  Google AI gave me Japanese SIDs by year since 1990 and even provided a link to the Paper the numbers came from.  There was a problem, however.  Google AI had the same death rates as the paper but attributed them to different years.  The time scale was out by 5 years.  Below are the numbers from the published paper.

SIDS did drop by 2/3rds but that does not mean it was due to the change in vaccine philosophy.  I wanted to compare Japan’s numbers with other countries to see if Japan during this period did have superior results.  Unfortunately I could not find government statistics or a paper that compared them but google AI gave me a convenient summary.  I couldn’t use the summary though.  The new summary from Google gave me numbers for various countries but the numbers provided for Japan did not match any of the numbers that I found in the paper.

So, a simple dinner conversation took me down a rabbit hole that produced 2 disturbing results.

1. Google AI is unreliable

I don’t know if the half truth my friend received was a result of not asking the question properly or if Google AI is programmed to lie.  It also can’t be explained why google AI produced 2 different summaries neither of which matched the official source it purportedly drew from.  I have long thought that AI was being oversold by the developers.  It seems to me to be more of a statical tool that searches for the most common answer rather than the correct answer.

2. Governments will kill babies for the right price

Japan was having success.  So why would they change?

A 2018 study in Pediatrics International found that Japan’s slower, more selective approach correlates with lower rates of severe vaccine reactions compared to countries with more aggressive schedules

We also saw this from Japan during COVID.  Japan due to their high average vitamin D levels did not have much of a problem with COVID.  That is until they made the stupid decision to start vaccinating people for COVID.  COVID infections exploded but Japan course corrected.  For a brief period, they stopped vaccinating and started treating COVID patients with ivermectin.  Then, unfortunately for the citizens, Japan returned to vaccination.

So, COVID and SIDS followed the same pattern.  Japan had a vaccine induced problem which caused them to stop vaccinating.  The problems went away but Japan returned to vaccinating anyway.  Why does the flow chart always end in vaccination.?  And why do successful outliers return to the fold? Things are done for love or money and no one in the vaccination business loves you.

Vaccines are base income for Big Pharma.  They are not like other treatments that only apply to specific demographics.  I am sure Viagra is very profitable.  But the problem with Viagra is that big Pharma can’t convince the public that infants should take it with regular boosters.  That leg work has been done for vaccines.  The public has been convinced that everyone needs dozens of injections followed by regular boosters.  Big Pharma cannot afford to have outliers that demonstrate this might not be true.  It is worth billions to them to protect the status quo.  With billions at stake bribing a few public health officials is just a rounding error on the balance sheet.

If you haven’t noticed by now the people charged with protecting public health do not give a damn about public health.  Any success that does not lead to higher profits will be stamped out ruthlessly.  There is more money in dead babies than protecting the public.