The COVID mitigation measures were obviously not going to work.  It was also obvious that they would all do more harm than good.  So why did we do any of it?  That is a question I have asked repeatedly on this blog.  The answer I keep coming back to is that the people involved were either incredibly evil or incredibly stupid.

Governments are full of stupid people.  but not everyone involved with government is stupid.  Some are just evil.  I like to describe government as a handful of sociopaths sprinkled among an army of useful idiots.  The sociopaths easily manipulate the useful idiots.  Every problem caused by government, which is almost every problem ordinary people face, is then the result of some combination of government malice and government incompetence.

This is the nature of government.  Government is a necessary evil, a rabid dog that must be kept on a very short leash.  And that is the crux of the problem.  We have failed to keep government on a short leash.  We let government grow and do many terrible things.

That insight should sober us. A society that tolerates the systematic erosion of individual judgment in favor of ideological obedience does not drift into danger accidentally. It chooses it. Slowly, joyfully, and with applause.

Evil rarely needs to conquer a free people. It only needs them to stop thinking.

The list of terrible things western governments has done is very long but right at the top is unrestricted immigration and multiculturalism.  The useful idiots in government no doubt truly believe that we are somehow enriched by this toxic combination, but it is not possible that the sociopaths believe this.  The data has never supported the idiotic claim that diversity is a strength.

the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less the volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects. In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogenous settings.

Which is exactly why 38 years ago the Canadian Security and Intelligence Services issued this warning to the Canadian government about the danger of multiculturalism.

Canada’s spy agency warned nearly four decades ago that rising immigration levels could undermine national security, according to a newly released CSIS memo that flagged the immigration stream itself as a growing source of threats.

Multiculturalism itself was cited as a complicating factor. CSIS warned that some newcomers could interpret official policy as tolerance for communalism, allowing Canada to be used as a base for émigré political activity, “even to the extent of using violence.”

The sociopaths ignored those warnings, and the useful idiots didn’t understand them.  Canada continued down the destructive “diversity is our strength” path and here we are.  We now have a fractured country.  Canada isn’t Canada anymore.

Canada is undergoing a quiet but profound erosion of national cohesion, authority and cultural confidence. At every level of government, political leadership has increasingly substituted ideological appeasement for the basic responsibilities of maintaining social order, enforcing the law and protecting the integrity of Canadian citizenship.

Canada once was a high trust prosperous society.  Now we have immigrant gangs extorting businesses.

Nearly 40 extortion-related incidents have been reported in Surrey this month alone, many of them violent.

“Surrey is facing a serious and growing crisis of organized extortion, intimidation and targeted shootings,” Locke said.

“Residents and business owners are living in constant fear. Public safety is at risk, and the social and economic impact is real.

And ideological morons in black robes who ignore the law if the law might be inconvenient for criminal migrants

However, Lewis’ attorney, Ali Kothawala, urged Judge Ray Phillips to impose a conditional discharge, meaning the conviction would not appear on his client’s criminal record, and therefore, he might not face deportation.

Canada was WOKE before the term was even coined.  That means Canada is further down this road than most countries.  Canada should serve as a cautionary tale to other countries that have chosen the same path, and there are a lot of them.  The US has a Diversity Immigration Immigrant Program which is just a lottery based on the premise that there are too many white people in the US.

The Diversity Immigrant Visa Program (DV Program) makes up to 50,000 immigrant visas available annually, drawn from random selection among all entries to individuals who are from countries with low rates of immigration to the United States. The DV Program is administered by the U.S. Department of State (DOS).

Not to be outdone, Spain has recently decided to give legal status to 500,000 criminals to realize the nonexistent “positive Impact” of allowing freeloaders to collect welfare.

 left-wing government has approved a plan to grant legal status to around 500,000 undocumented migrants – a move that has sparked fury on the right – marking a sharp break with tougher policies elsewhere in Europe.

Migration Minister Elma Saiz said the beneficiaries would be allowed to work ‘in any sector, in any part of the country’, hailing what she described as the ‘positive impact’ of migration.

The useful idiots in Spain’s government went home feeling very virtuous after this announcement.  On the other hand, the sociopaths understand the consequences of this will be delightfully painful.  It won’t be long before Spanish newspapers have the similar headlines as the Telegraph just published in Britain.

How many more British girls must be raped before the Left admits the truth about asylum?

Modern western governments are simultaneously evil and stupid.  Stupid programs start as an idea driven by malice.  It is then implemented and enforced out of shear stupidity.  I am certain that some programs do not start with evil intentions.  They are driven by stupidity from inception.  But does it matter?  The end point is the same.  Citizens are harmed whether the policy is born from government stupidity or government Malice.

This will continue for as long as we allow it to continue.  Citizens must take back control of their rogue governments.  No one voted for this.  Why do we put up with it?

It took 6 years, but people are finally getting it.  The covid mitigation measures had no basis in science and made things worse rather than better.

We now know that covid – or at least the fear of it and the restrictions that followed – caused a trail of economic destruction which may never be repaired. But for me, covid actually did a good turn as it enabled me finally to wake up as to what was going on all around me.

The entire COVID narrative is a gigantic lie.  Leaked correspondence proves Saint Fauci to be a sociopathic liar whose objectives were never public health.

Fauci called the Israeli study “rather impressive,” acknowledging that natural immunity was the informed choice over an experimental vaccine. But Fauci could not have gained power or wealth through natural immunity.

The tactic is always the same: scare the population, demand emergency powers, then never give them back. COVID was the excuse. The objective was submission.

The lies are getting so hard to perpetuate that some are now trying to exonerate themselves by telling the truth 6 years later.

“It was never meant to prevent transmission … It probably was a misnomer to call it a vaccine. It’s really more like a medicine. It doesn’t stop infection.”

That quote is from Dr. Robert Redfield.  He was head of the CDC when the COVID conspiracy was implemented but he was replaced in January 2021 when the Jab mandates were starting.  I would guess that he was replaced because they could not trust him to keep his mouth shut about the Jabs.  But he did keep his mouth shut for a very long time and is only trying to distance himself now that the public is waking up.

The public, or at least some of the public, finally realize just how large this conspiracy was.  It is about time.  None of this was hard to see.  Anyone reading this blog over the last 5 years would know:

• Masks don’t work because they can’t work
• Social distancing will have almost no effect on an airborne pathogen.
• Lockdowns will cause more harm than good.
• The Jabs are not vaccines and do not prevent infection.

Even an N95 mask cannot filter 100% of the virus out.  Wearing anything coarser than that is like trying to keep mosquitos out with a chain link fence.  In Laboratory testing some cloth masks made things worse. 

 

The Idea of stemming a viral outbreak by social distancing comes from a high school science project, that alone should have been enough for us to abandon the idea.  There might have been some rational for this if this virus was a close contact virus, but it obviously is not.  The main transmission method of Covid 19 must be by aerosols.  If this virus were not airborne there is no way it would have spread so widely so quickly.  Close contact viruses infect thousands of people.  Airborne virus infects millions of people, as of October 13^th over 38 million people have tested positive for Covid.  There is no way this virus is not airborne, and 6 feet means nothing when the HVAC system can carry it anywhere in the building.

 

Unemployment as a cure for a viral infection is the most curious part of this whole farce.  You can’t even find a high school science project to blame this on.  Long term effects of high unemployment are well established and none of them are good.  This is the most drastic measure that has been applied and it seems to be designed simply to fuel panic and increase misery.  Panic kills. 

 

First the whole concept of breakthrough infections.  The Jabs are not designed to prevent infection just reduce symptoms.  What exactly is the virus breaking through?  We should have expected jabbed people to get infected.

 

It was easy to see that the government, health agencies, and the media were lying but most did not.  To see the crime, you had to see through the fear which most people cannot do.  Governments know that fear clouds judgement.  That is why they use fear when they want to do something truly disgusting like profit from experimental treatments.

Fear is the most powerful tool in the government toolbox.  COVID is not the first time it has been used (can you spell climate change) and it will not be the last.  In fact, they are using it now.  Canadians are told we must fear Donald Trump.  Trump is so dangerous that we must protect ourselves by being subservient to communist China and signing more deals with Brookfield Investments.  Europeans are told to fear Vladimir Putin.  Putin is so dangerous that Europe must start WW3.

It isn’t that hard to get beyond fear.  You just need to remember a couple simple truths.  If it comes from the government or their pets in the media; It is almost certainly a lie and it is for their benefit not yours.  Fear gives the government power over you.  That is not the way it is supposed to work.  You should have power over the government.  The government should fear you.  We need to change our relationship with government before we find ourselves in some new fake pandemic or worse, another world war.

The title of this post is a question asked by Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong in an interview with Dr. Drew.  During the interview both men asked many questions about the world’s most questionable medical intervention.  They have no answers, but their questions serve to point out the absolute stupidity of the covid vax.  I found the short discussion very refreshing because I asked similar questions three and a half years ago.

The Idea behind the mRNA (Pfizer, Moderna) and adenovirus (J&J, AstraZeneca) vaccines is to teach your body how to make spike proteins.  Your body’s immune system will react and produce antibodies which will give you partial, although temporary, protection from COVID.  So if you boil it down the essence is to expose your body to the spike protein to provoke an immune response.  Why take such a circuitous route?

I have mentioned many times that I am an engineer.  I am often hired to solve a problem and one thing I have learned over the last 35 years is that the simple solution is always the best solution.  If you want to expose someone to the spike protein, why don’t you simply inject the spike protein?  Why mess with their DNA and hope their body produces the spike protein correctly?

As it happens, I can answer all of Dr. Drew’s and Dr. Shiong’s questions.  It is not because I am smarter or more knowledgeable than either man.  It is because I was asking these questions earlier than them and that I don’t wear the same blinders that they do.

It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail

Abraham Maslow

Drs. Drew and Shiong are trained medically.  Their training colors their perception.  To them their must be a medical reason for the design of the COVID vaccines.  They are mystified because they just can’t see it.  It is not their fault they can’t see the medical reasoning because it does not exist.

My training is different.  I am an engineer.  I was also an executive in a large company.  My hammer sees different nails than the good doctors’ hammer does.  With no medical training I can tell you that there are no medical reasons behind the design of the COVID vaccines.  The COVID vaccines have nothing to do with COVID and everything to do with profits, unlimited profits.

Messenger RNA vaccines don’t work and are not safe.  That does not matter to big Pharma.  To big pharma mRNA vaccines are simply a license to print money.  The first goal of the COVID conspiracy is to get mRNA approved for use in humans.  That could not have happened without a fake pandemic and lockdowns.  The second goal of the COVID conspiracy is to shift all vaccines to the mRNA platform.

Vaccines are very profitable, not because the profit per jab is high, but because everyone takes them.  The potential market is 8 billion people with every new vaccine.  And with mRNA there will be an unlimited number of new vaccines.  If Big Pharma can convince the public that with mRNA a new vaccine can be developed hours after sequencing the genome of a new virus, then every year there will be new viruses “discovered”.  Each new virus will come with their own new mRNA vaccine everyone must take to prevent extinction of humanity.

Think about that for a minute.  No more research and development costs.  You can use the same labs and same facilities to manufacture different vaccines.  Each dose becomes almost pure profit.  Even better, if your cash flow dips even a little you can just announce you have “discovered” a new deadly virus.  All big pharma needs then is for one of their pet politicians to threaten lockdowns.

You can search all you want for medical reasons behind the COVID vaccine design or any other COVID mitigation measure, and you will not find any because it was never about a virus.  It was always about profits.

Is the cure worse than the disease?  That is something that should always be considered yet is rarely considered.  During COVID governments forced lockdowns on us.  The reasoning was that it would reduce spread of the virus.  Even had that turned out to be true the conversation should not have ended there.  We should have discussed the downside of lockdowns.  Why did we only consider the potential upside without considering the very substantial downside?

The downside of lockdowns is obvious.  The stress from unemployment, financial hardship, and isolation would lead to increased deaths.  Lockdowns, had they worked, would have also prolonged the pandemic.  The quickest way out was not to wait for a vaccine.  It was to let healthy people be exposed to the virus.  So why was none of this discussed.  Why was the discussion so one-sided?

The answer is obvious.  Any honest discussion of the downside of the lockdowns would have prevented the government from using them.  It would have stopped their disgusting plans in the tracks.  Governments present one sided argument to justify decisions that have already been made.  COVID was not the first time governments have used this tactic, and it will not be the last.  The Climate Change narrative has survived for 4 decades on one sided argument.

To start, let’s get something out of the way.  There is no climate emergency just as there was no COVID emergency.  COVID and climate crises exist only in computer models that have no relation to science or reality.  Most people will be surprised to know that the best available science shows that greenhouse gases have very little effect on the temperature of the earth.  Adding more won’t change the temperature by any measurable amount.

We’ve known since the 19th century that CO2 is a mild greenhouse gas. However, in the past 600 million years, there have been periods of high temperature and low CO2 concentration and vice versa. In other words, there is no direct link between temperature and CO2, and the physics that applied millions of years ago still apply today. 

Dramatic evidence has been published in a number of recent science papers that carbon dioxide levels are already ‘saturated’, meaning little or no further warming is to be expected and rising CO2 levels are all beneficial.

In conclusion, Dr. Bhatta observes that his evidence raises serious questions about the established assumptions regarding the impact of CO2 emissions on global warming. While the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change claims “unequivocally” that humans have caused global warming, he continues, “the empirical evidence presented herein does not provide support to such straightforward relationship”.

The data has never supported the theory.  CO2 is not a problem.  But our governments insist that CO2 is a problem and they impose restrictions which make energy very expensive.  So why don’t we consider the downside of expensive energy?  Is the cure worse than the disease?

We are often told that a hotter world will come with more disasters.  This also is a lie.  The data does not support this anymore than it supports the idea CO2 controls the temperature.  But we will play along with this government lie and pretend that CO2 that does not cause warming will cause warming and warming that does not cause severe weather will cause severe weather.  The question we need to ask is what protects us from storms and other natural disasters?

The answer is wealth.  Disasters in wealthy countries cause fewer deaths than disasters in poor countries.  The Japanese earthquake that impacted the Fukushima nuclear plant was 50 times more powerful than the Haiti earthquake, yet it resulted in 50 times fewer deaths.  Japan is wealthy and Haiti is poor.  Wealth saves lives or poverty kills.  Whichever way you look at it, it is safer to be wealthy.

So, what causes one society to be wealthy and another to be poor?  There are many reasons but at the top of the list is cheap reliable energy.

Once income is accounted for, the apparent relationship between climate hazards and mortality largely disappears. In other words, economic development—not renewable energy—dominates human survival outcomes.

Climate policies that inevitably increase the cost of energy make us more rather than less vulnerable to severe weather.  The cure is worse than the disease.  It is way past time to discuss the potentially deadly downside of Climate hysteria.

Recently I have found several sources discussing what I have been saying since 2021.  The government is manufacturing real deaths to support their fake pandemic.  And, vaccinated people who died were fraudulently classified as unvaccinated to conceal vaccine failure and injuries.

The ‘cheap trick’ is one of classification, whereby people who are vaccinated are classified as unvaccinated up to a point when the effectiveness of the vaccine is supposed to kick in.

Thus, any illness or death in that initial period – usually two weeks – amongst the vaccinated is credited to the unvaccinated side of the ledger. As Neil and Fenton point out in Fighting Goliath, a vaccine with absolutely no benefit can be shown to be effective merely by the application of the cheap trick.

The vaccines failed completely it was fraudulent accounting that produced vaccine effectiveness.  When you do the numbers correctly the vaccines do not look safe or effective in fact, they look very dangerous.  None of this is surprising to me.  I predicted vaccine failure in May of 2021 and later that year data started to show how incredibly dangerous they were.

Today we have Scottish data showing excess deaths in each age group start when Vaccinations start for that age group.

These are not just deaths from adverse reactions.  If they were the lines would not be straight.  They would flatten as vaccinations are finished for each age group.  They are also not COVID deaths because they are happening in the summer when Official COVID totals are low as they were in the Irish example.

I wrote that in November 2021.  So, 4 years ago it was obvious that the vaccines were killing people.  The government covered these murders by attributing many of the deaths to the unvaccinated population.  It was ridiculous but it worked.  To this day I still find it hard to believe that people swallowed this obvious lie.  Seriously how stupid must you be to believe that the SARs COV-2 virus and life in general would suddenly become more dangerous precisely when your neighbors were vaccinated?

The government gets away with lies, even deadly lies, because the public accepts them.  This does not need to continue.  You are allowed to think for yourself.  When the government tells you something that can’t be true it isn’t.  Stop letting liars make excuses for their crimes.