I am never sure who I should hate more; greedy politicians who do incredibly destructive things, or the journalists that help them get way with it.  The following is from an article by the Toronto Star.

Clearly, Carney understands the scope of the climate threat, and he realizes that transitioning to clean energy is necessary and that it would actually benefit Canada’s economy.

However, lined up against Carney is the enormously powerful set of interests that make up the fossil fuel industry, and they have very different plans for Canada.

Their plans demand that Ottawa assist them (including with huge financial subsidies) as they squeeze every dollop of bitumen from the ground — no matter how wildly fires rage across the country and how Trumpishly orange the skies become.

Alas, Carney has capitulated to these demands. 

I normally don’t pay any attention to the Star.  But the Star has the widest circulation of any publication in Canada, which is a problem when you consider that not a single word printed above is true.

Clearly, Carney understands the scope of the climate threat, and he realizes that transitioning to clean energy is necessary and that it would actually benefit Canada’s economy.

Mark Carney likes to claim that Canada will benefit economically from clean energy, and the Star is helping him by repeating that lie.  To start with there is no such thing as clean energy.  Every form of energy comes with environmental impacts. To pretend that wind turbines and solar panels have no cost is just childish.  Second, Wind Turbines and Solar panels are expensive and unreliable.  Every country that has used them has seen costs increase and grid reliability decrease due to the intermittent and unpredictable nature of those technologies.  There is not a single piece of evidence that says making energy expensive and unreliable has positive economic benefits.

However, lined up against Carney is the enormously powerful set of interests that make up the fossil fuel industry, and they have very different plans for Canada.

This is another statement that Canadian media loves to make.  That big oil dictates to government how things are going to work.  Anyone like me who works in the industry knows what a joke that is.  The Canadian oil industry is regulated almost to death.  Recently I could not fix a culvert without prior government approval.  Justin Trudeau cancelled an Enbridge pipeline permit after Enbridge had spent 6 years and 1 billion dollars jumping through hoops to get the permit.  If the oil industry was as powerful as the star thinks, would it take 6 years to get a permit that could be cancelled on a whim?  Would government permission be necessary to fix a simple culvert?

Their plans demand that Ottawa assist them (including with huge financial subsidies) as they squeeze every dollop of bitumen from the ground — no matter how wildly fires rage across the country and how Trumpishly orange the skies become.

Alas, Carney has capitulated to these demands. 

This statement references the recent announcement that the province of Alberta would finance a new pipeline.  The star reports that this was a demand from industry but not a single company asked for this.  Mark Carney put so many ridiculously expensive conditions on a new pipeline that no private company would touch it.  But Alberta Premier Daniel Smith is facing a separatist movement in her province.  Smith believes she can placate the separatists and preserve her political career by building a pipeline.  So how exactly did Carney capitulate to a demand that was never given?

Also don’t get me started on the whole “we would never have forest fires if no one owned an SUV narrative”.

When I read such ridiculous tripe, I immediately thought this would be a rant about how Canadian politics are corrupt because the media so badly misinforms Canadians.  But that would only be part of the issue.  Media misinforms people everywhere.  This is an article out of Australia about how expensive and unreliable electricity has become.

Price hikes have been mostly due to network costs, or the cost of transporting power, with operators investing heavily in infrastructure

“But are we prepared to tolerate a slightly slower pace of decarbonisation on electricity in the name of less expensive energy? Or are we prepared to take little more outage time in exchange for lower prices?”

The price hikes are from network costs.  This is true but it is not the whole truth.  They fail to mention none of this spending would have been necessary if not for the transition to “clean” energy.  Then the article presents only 2 solutions; pay more or accept blackouts.  There is however a third option.  Australia could simply stop being stupid.  Before “clean” energy, energy was cheap and reliable.  Just turn back the clock.  Unfortunately, common sense is not the narrative the media supports.

My last example is an interview that Elon Musk gave.  The Journalist had an agenda.  She wanted to paint Musk as an evil killer.

In 90 minutes, she threw out “facts” that “everybody knows,” such as that Elon killed children in Africa, or that he fronts for fascists, and that he is “despised.” It would be enough to intimidate most people into a defensive ball.

The narrative is not new.  It is also not true.  But the journalist knows her job is not the truth.  She just did not expect that Musk could so easily dismantle her in front of her own camera.

The western world is collapsing under the weight of its own stupidity.  It is the result of politics and politicians.  But could any of this happen if our media was not so corrupt?  You do not hate mainstream media enough.

What does it mean to be Canadian?  That is one of the most often asked questions in Canada.  You would think after 159 years as a country that would be an easy question to answer but it is not.  Part of the problem is that the country has changed.  The Canadians who carved a country out of a frozen wilderness and punched above their weight in 2 world wars bear little relationship to the people who occupy Canada now.

Canadians didn’t just lose their identity they destroyed it without replacing it with anything other than a passport.  So, my first question is difficult for Canadian passport holders.  The only thing they all agree on is that Canadians are not Americans.  It is a little odd to define yourself by identifying what you are not, but that statement is objectively True.  Canadians look like Americans and sound like Americans, but they are definitely not American.

Americans are extremely independent while Canadians are wholly dependent on government.  Part of that fierce independence in the US is that Americans don’t care what the rest of the world thinks about them.  That is why they don’t mind airing their dirty laundry in public.  When there is a problem Americans fight about it opening so the whole world can see.  Conversely Canadians continually obsess over how others see them.  Problems are never discussed to preserve the fairy tale illusion of the Canadian utopia.

When any Canadian dares to discuss a problem, the Maple Maoists shut down the conversation by pointing to an international poll that ranks Canada high on some metric.  To them the fact that people who don’t live in Canada and know very little about the country have a favorable opinion of Canada is proof we don’t have a problem.  How is that even a data point?  Let alone the only data point that matters.

The fact is that Canada has a lot of problems even if Canadians refuse to acknowledge them.  Our economy always underperforms.

One in four Canadian manufacturers have either moved their operation to the U.S. or are planning to do so, according to a new survey from KPMG Canada.

The courts protect the government not the citizens.

The Lich-Barber prosecution fits that pattern. It tells citizens that dissent is permitted only when it is polite, brief, powerless, and useful to the governing narrative. 

What’s happening here is not proportional. It is selective, political, and childishly vindictive. It was designed to make a very public example out of people whose real offence was not mischief, but disobedience.

And China uses criminal networks to control important Canadian infrastructure.

Drug traffickers use the ports to bring fentanyl precursors and cocaine in and to ship methamphetamine out to premium markets like Australia. Organized crime has infiltrated the port workforce itself, giving networks the insider access to contaminate containers and time shipments around enforcement. And hostile states — China foremost among them in McGregor’s analysis — along with sanctioned regimes such as Iran, per the advisories the essay cites, exploit the same seams for commercial intelligence collection, sanctions evasion and strategic positioning

All while our politicians behave like royalty, completely unconcerned about the welfare of the peasants they tax.

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s delegation spent nearly $160,000 on in-flight catering during a single overseas trip, according to government records obtained by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, prompting renewed criticism over government travel spending.

The records show Carney and a 55-member entourage spent $159,800 on meals during a week-long trip to Athens, Abu Dhabi, Johannesburg and the Canary Islands in November 2025.

That amounts to roughly $2,850 per passenger.

“Carney spent more money on airplane food during one trip than the average family will spend on groceries in almost a decade,” said Franco Terrazzano, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation’s federal director.

According to the CTF, Carney spent nearly $1 million on in-flight catering across 14 flights during his first year as prime minister.

Problems and corrupt politicians don’t just exist in Canada they thrive in Canada because Canadians refuse to do anything about it.  Canadians would rather sink into despair than to have uncomfortable conversations.  That is why Donald Trump and Alberta Independence trigger Canadians so badly.

Donald Trump is prone to bombastic statements but there is always a grain of truth beneath his bluster.  The truth hurts.  Canadians hate when Trump speaks about Canada because they know he is right but are loath to admit it.  The same can be said about Alberta independence and it explains why the reaction to Alberta independence is far different than the reaction to Quebec independence.

Quebec independence is based on Quebec being a distinct society.  Quebecers don’t see anything wrong with Canada they just want to go it alone.  They Quebec referendum did not force Canadians to have any uncomfortable conversations, so Canadians showered Quebecers with love to convince them to stay.  Conversely The Alberta referendum has been met with vitriol and hate.

It can be argued that Alberta is also a distinct society but that is not what drives Alberta independence.  Albertans are just tired of Canada’s shit.  There is no way to convince Albertans to stay without acknowledging the problems and producing concrete plans to fix them.  Albertans are forcing Canadians to look in the mirror and Canadians hate them for it.

Ironically the most common COVID vaccine injury was COVID.  Every country stupid enough to use an experimental treatment that was definitely not a vaccine saw a surge of COVID infection immediately after vaccinations started.  This was obvious to anyone who paid attention.

Not only do the mRNA vaccinations not produce antibodies in the airway they also do not produce a full or permanent immune response.  There is no way the vaccine hoaxers did not know this.  The first lie to be exposed was the myth that the viruses would stop infection and transmission.  Every country with high vaccine utilization saw an explosion of infections that could not be hidden.  Not only did the jabs not prevent infection they seemed to facilitate infection.  Still we were told not to worry.  The jabs still prevented severe infection and death.  Despite the fact that vaccinated people were still dying from COVID few people question this lie.

Sadly, it took 5 years for most people to pay attention to the bleeding obviously.

COVID deaths exploded after the vaccine rollout.

Africa: +43%

Europe: +500%

Americas: +706%

Western Pacific: +1,275%

 

The more “vaccine” compliant the region, the higher the death toll.  This should have triggered emergency hearings.

Ironically without the vaccines there was no emergency.  Almost all COVID deaths occurred after the vaccination programs started and most of those infections were due to the vaccine.  It was not hard to see this.  To me it was as plain as day only months after the vaccine programs started.

Many wealthy countries are rapidly vaccinating their populations now with some very interesting results.  Qatar had very few problems with Covid until after they started vaccinating people.  Vaccinations began in late December and COVID cases started increasing shortly after.       

More importantly, the majority of People will never get COVID in the first place.  After 2 seasons and with variants now running amok, only 3.5% of Albertans have tested positive.  Most of those people had mild or no symptoms.  There are still only 3 countries that have exceeded 10%.  No one in government is asking the obvious question.  Why aren’t more people getting sick?

Maybe governments are not asking because they already know the answer.  Contact tracing shows that you can be quarantined with an infectious person and only 18% of the time will they infect you.  This is almost exactly the percentage we saw on the diamond princess cruise ship.  After being quarantined together for weeks only 17% of people got infected.  There seems to be a high level of pre-existing immunity already in the population.  More and more studies like this one are confirming that.

Depending on the study, the level of pre-existing immunity to COVID was between 70 and 90%.  Corona viruses are common.  Even with the genetic manipulation financed by Fauci, the SAR COV-2 virus was still similar enough to other corona viruses that most people had some level immunity.  COVID was never going to be a problem unless we were stupid enough to take a treatment that had immune suppression baked into the design.

The reason for the suppression is that the jabs “confuse” your immune system.  If they had used a viral RNA sequence in the jabs your body would recognize it as part of a virus and get rid of it before it could re-program your cells to produce the spike protein.  To avoid this they disguised the messenger RNA to look like human RNA.  Your immune system does not know what to do with it.  A toxin (the spike protein) is pouring in to your system but your body can’t find any infected cells.

In other words the only way the Jabs can be effective against COVID is if they suppress your overall immunity.  You are protected from COVID but more susceptible to everything else.  Dr. Cole warned about this months ago.  He said he was already seeing an increase in secondary infections and cancers in vaccinated patients.

The COVID jabs were not just a mistake.  We knew enough not to use them in the first place and even had we made that mistake within months we knew enough to stop.  Yet we did not.  The Jabs were not a mistake they were a crime.  People need to be held accountable, but I doubt it will happen if it has taken 5 years to acknowledge what was obvious from the start.  Still, it is good to see that people are finally coming to the truth.  But we have a long way to go.  Idiots like this still hold positions of influence.

Somebody needs to explain to me how the COVID vaccine is safer than COVID when it makes you more likely to get COVID.  I really would like to know that answer, but I have a more vexing question I would like someone to answer.  How did a man like Neil Stone ever become a doctor and why are there so many like him?