Climate change nonsense is demographically concentrated

Western politicians are destroying their own countries over the fraudulent science of Anthropogenic Greenhouse gas warming.  This ridiculous theory has been used to destroy economies for quite some time but recently the attacks have stepped up to a fever pitch.  Apparently the one lesson Government learned from COVID is that the public will not stop them.  They do not need to move slowly or give any plausible explanations.  The public will accept anything, no matter how ridiculous, if the media tells them we have an emergency.

Since COVID no longer has the necessary impact government has pivoted back to, and ramped up, climate change rhetoric.  Just in the last few months government has saved the planet by;

  • Banning fertilizer
  • Confiscating farms
  • Banning gas stoves and wood ovens
  • Regulating cars out of existence

You might notice that nothing on that list is actually good for people and that is the point.  Climate change policies are inherently anti-human.  This is something that you would think would be plainly apparent to all humans but it is not.  Wealthy white liberals and journalists have clueless sided with government in this war against humanity.

Malcom X once correctly pointed out that the biggest threat to the black community is white liberals.  It is also true that the white liberal is the biggest threat to the white community; communities of any color for that matter.  Every destructively stupid problem we face right now is fueled by wealthy white liberals.  Go to any climate protest and you will find yourself in an ocean of wealthy white liberals.  Spoiled brats insulated from the real world by inherited or unearned wealth.

It is ‘counterproductive’, says Mr Neilson, to have pink-haired sons and daughters of privilege inconveniencing workers during a ‘brutal’ economic downturn. Again, he’s not wrong. The class-war streak in eco-activism is undeniable. Many Extinction Rebellion types are descendants of money. Writer Harry Mount calls them ‘Econians’, a green twist on ‘Etonians’. They’re the ‘public-school boys and girls who rule the wokerati world’. A survey of 6,000 XR activists who brought London to a halt in April 2019 found they were ‘overwhelmingly middle-class [and] highly educated’. Anyone who walked through London that month will have heard ‘Cut carbon emissions!’ being cried in cut-class tones and understood right away that our great city was under siege by vengeful aristocrats still smarting from the Industrial Revolution.

This vocal, Ill educated, army of useful idiots is spurred on by a media that never misses a chance to pump up the nonexistent threat of climate change and the fossil fuel industry.  I came across another fraudulent article this morning with a familiar false claim that the oil industry receives massive government subsidies.  The article is to reinforce the idea that we would not use fossil fuels if government was not conspiring with the petroleum industry.  All we must do is drop fossil fuel subsidies and the world will instantly transition to “green” energy.

Canada has for years forked over billions of dollars in subsidies to oil and gas companies — an approach that critics say flies in the face of the country’s climate goals, and impinges on efforts to turn toward renewable energy sources.

This statement is the best kind of lie; a partial truth.  It is true that government in Canada has given money to the oil industry and the CBC has published a list of recent promises.

$12 billion in loans and financial support for the TransMountain pipeline.

$500 million in loans to the Coastal GasLink Pipeline.

$300 million to help with decarbonization projects.

$78 million to help the oil and gas sector grow and reduce its greenhouse gas emissions.

$20 million to help oil and gas companies reduce their methane emissions.

The thing about this list is that not a single one of these expenditures is an actual subsidy.

Trans Mountain pipeline

The government bought the Trans mountain pipeline after cancelling the permits for a public company that was going to build the line.  If the government had stayed out of this the line would have been built anyway for a fraction of the 12 billion dollar price tag (the original budget was 5 billion).  Even though the government has bought the line and ballooned the budget this is in no way an industry subsidy.  Companies still must pay a tariff to use the line just as they would to a private company.  Essentially the government bought a business that derives its income from the oil industry.

Costal gas link

How is a loan a subsidy?  The loan is to be repaid with interest.  The only reason government is involved is that they have made pipelines toxic for investment.  But the government wants this particular pipeline for political purposes so they were forced to finance it.  Again this is government assuming the role of private industry after making it impossible for private industry to function properly.

The rest of the list

The government introduced expensive and utterly useless new regulations.  The regulations only purpose is to give the appearance that Canada is serious about climate change.  To prevent industry from discussing what a huge waste of money this is, government offered to pay for some of it.  None of this had to happen.  If the government had not instituted these useless regulations not a penny would have changed hands.  This is not an industry subsidy it is just another example of government waste.

 

A friend of mine likes to point out that the myth of subsidized oil is very easy to dispel with simple logic.  Energy is the primary input for every product or service and 85% of the world’s energy comes from hydrocarbons.  If the energy industry is kept afloat through subsidies it means that 85% the economy is based on government subsidizes.  That math does not work; the money will run out.  You cannot subsidize 85% of an economy without the economy quickly collapsing.

Simple logic usually steers you to the correct answer.  Unfortunately simple logic, otherwise known as common sense, is highly uncommon among white liberals and media.

4 replies
  1. Erica
    Erica says:

    A white co worker of mine back in NYC (who always complained if she wasn’t tipped 20%) was NOT tipped by a black customer. She didn’t complain but rather implied forgoing a tip was the least she could do because…..racism. Like she deserved to be stiffed for being white. Huh? Ok holding black people to a different (lower) standard is the OPPOSITE of what Dr ML King preached but whatever. She’s one of millions of middle aged white women in NYC who will happily destroy the future because they are being programmed to feel guilty for being alive. I’m sure she supports green energy policy which is ultimately harmful and disempowering but she can’t think but for the pink haired noise coming from the liberal elite. Something utterly bizarre has happened to “liberals” who accept these things….a total inversion….no more spirit of intellectual debate but unquestioning acceptance of dogma…and authority (democrat authority only! Can’t look elsewhere or you’re a bad person!)). .this war against humanity is happening on so many levels….including psychologically
    My old roommate (single white 50 something in liberal nyc) said she hopes her recently vacated job goes to a black Woman. A job should go to who is best qualified and not too long ago that went without saying. In fact, this concept of equal opportunity is what the civil rights movement was all about but that’s been perverted and these liberals don’t seem to even notice the 360 degree switch! This idea she has has been IMPLANTED and she doesn’t even realize it. I could go on, and don’t want to deviate from your climate post but to me it’s all connected, all of it is anti-humanity and getting people on board by manufacturing emotions of guilt and fear.

    • richardsuffron
      richardsuffron says:

      You are 100% correct Erica, all of this woke ideology is connected. When Martin Luther used that phrase about judging only on the content of the character and not the color of the skin it was considered one of the most eloquent condemnations of racism every spoken. Now those same words in our liberal inverted society would be considered racist. Now we are told all we should consider is race. This rhetoric is not good for any race. I once had a job as a functional manager for a company that had a team structure. I supervised the production engineers on each team but no other team members they all reported to their various functional managers. I hired a young black engineer for one of the teams that had a toxic geologist. Her supervisor and her supervisor’s supervisor were technically competent, nice people who could not deal with conflict. They refused to address any of the problems she caused because it was easier to blame other people on the team that reported to other managers. It did not take long for my new engineer to come in conflict with the geologist. My new engineer told me he was being singled out for being black and his career was over at this company. I told him that he was not being singled out and the blame placed on him was unimportant since the only opinion of his performance that mattered was mine and I was happy with his performance. In fact he was one of my more promising junior engineers and I did not want to lose him but I had no openings on any other team. He promptly quit which in hindsight was probably good if he was going to blame racism every time there was conflict. I don’t know what happened to him after that but I doubt he ever found peace. There are not many black people in the city (lots of brown) so anywhere he went he would deal with white people who he was convinced hated him and would never let him advance. The victim ideology was keeping him down and he could not see it. The indoctrination was way too deep.

  2. Derek
    Derek says:

    URBAN white liberals to be more precise. Media saturated, metro area dwelling, vapid conformists. They are told what to think by oligarch-controlled media that is catered to them.

    I dislike hearing the word liberal attached to these people. The ideology that guides them is illiberal. They adhere to centralized authoritarianism.

    That is why I have taken to the rather vulgar colloquialism “shitlib” to describe these cretins.

Comments are closed.