Rediscovering informed consent

One of the things that surprised and then disappointed me during the COVID debacle was how few doctors chose to protect their patients.  Some doctors did speak out but they were at least initially ignored and marginalized.  Vaccine injuries have now become too common to ignore and that has prompted a few more doctors to speak out.  Below is a video of Florida Surgeon general Joseph Ladapo discussing mRNA.  In short he is not a fan but too afraid of big pharma to call for a ban.


For those doctors who are still silent I have a few questions for you.  I know that med school was expensive and you got paid to inject people but did you forget your lessons on informed consent?  How could your patients possibly be aware of the risks when even you were not aware of the risks?  Why did you think it was appropriate to inject low risk patients with a medicine that carried future undefined risks?

Even if you made the initial mistake of choosing profit over informed consent how did you not notice that your patients were returning with strange, serious health problems?  And, how did you not notice that these mysterious ailments were not affecting your unvaccinated patients?  What caused your initial short sidedness to become actual blindness?

Doctors should have known better but so should the bureaucracies that at least on paper are designed to protect the public.  These treatments never should have been approved.  The trial data from Pfizer was obviously fraudulent and Pfizer has a history of fraud.  Why on earth would anyone have trusted Pfizer in the first place?  It was not difficult to determine that at best these treatments would have a negligible effect on the pandemic.  I was able to do that in May of 2021 with only a couple hours of research.

  1. These treatments only serve to give your immune system a Boost. They help improve your odds of survival.  They really do not do anything more than Vitamin D and Ivermectin.  But there is one crucial difference.  There are no known side effects for Vitamin D and Ivermectin.

  2. The benefit from the treatment is temporary. Antibodies fade quickly without the T cells you have no lasting immunity.  That is what the yearly booster shots are for.  The booster shots are not for new variants as you have been led to believe.

  3. We cannot reach herd immunity through Vaccination. To reach herd immunity everyone must still be exposed to the virus and get infected.

There is no way that they did not know these treatments offered only partial temporary protection.  That is not much benefit for a treatment with unknown potential long term health effects.  But no one who took them was told that.  How many people do you know would have taken a jab if they had an honest conversation with their doctor?  That conversation should have gone like this.


Patient:                Should I take the COVID vaccine?

Doctor:                 First these are not vaccines.  It will not keep you from getting COVID.  Theoretically it should help but the benefit is temporary.  You will need to take boosters every 4 to 6 months for the rest of your life or until you get COVID.

Patient:               But the benefit is still greater than the risk right?

Doctor:                 I cannot say that.  No one knows what problems you might have years from now.  There is also no data on    what regular boosters might do.

Patient:                Then why would I take it?

Doctor:                 You are not in a high risk group for COVID so I can think of no good reason for you to take the jab.


Informed Consent is all it would have taken to derail the COVID vaccine gravy train but somehow we forgot all about informed consent in 2021.  We are only now rediscovering Informed consent now in 2024.

. . . Although it can be argued that every preventative or therapeutic pharmacological intervention is a two-edged sword if we consider every single potential side effect that could be associated with its use [9], before consenting to receiving the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, recipients must certainly be informed about what is known and what is not known in terms of immediate- and long-term safety

The horse has already bolted and now politicians are finally stepping up to close the barn door.  Better late than never I guess.  The sad reality is that none of this should have ever happened.  The science never indicating mass application of the COVID jabs was anything other than a gigantic unnecessary risk.  But, that is not what people were told.  The public was told that the science was solid but what we were calling science was not science.  It was marketing for a dangerous product sold by amoral people.  I cannot state it any better than this X user so I will give him the last word today.

It’s funny, whenever I try to follow the science, it keeps leading me to the people who visited Epstein’s Island…