We harmed children and felt quite virtuous doing it
There is another study showing COVID vaccines cause heart damage in children. The study also refutes the lie that heart damage is more prevalent after COVID infection than COVID vaccination.
A new large-scale study from renowned scientists at the prestigious University of Oxford has just confirmed that myocarditis and pericarditis only appear in children and adolescents after Covid vaccination and not after infection from the virus.
The study did find that the vaccines reduced COVID severity but the protection was temporary.
Among both adolescents and children, myocarditis and pericarditis were documented only in the vaccinated groups, with rates of 27 and 10 cases/million after first and second doses respectively. Conclusion BNT162b2 vaccination in adolescents reduced COVID-19 A&E attendance and hospitalisation, although these outcomes were rare. Protection against positive SARS-CoV-2 tests was transient.
Once again I must say, “No shit Sherlock”.
-
These treatments only serve to give your immune system a Boost. They help improve your odds of survival. They really do not do anything more than Vitamin D and Ivermectin. But there is one crucial difference. There are no known side effects for Vitamin D and Ivermectin.
-
The benefit from the treatment is temporary. Antibodies fade quickly without the T cells you have no lasting immunity. That is what the yearly booster shots are for. The booster shots are not for new variants as you have been led to believe.
I wrote that in May of 2021 after doing about 2 hours of research in to how the jabs and immune system work. It was not difficult to figure out that at best the jabs offered only partial temporary protection. That is not much benefit for the risk of an experimental treatment that always caused problems in the lab and showed problems in the abbreviated trials used to get emergency use authorization.
Before the first needle went in to the first arm is was clear to anyone who bothered to look that the Jabs did not make sense for any low risk person. Why risk long term health problems or even death for temporary protection against a virus that was extremely unlikely to cause death? It was ill advised for any healthy adult to take the jab. It was criminal for an adult to be part of jabbing children.
Almost everyone on earth was low risk. Children were essentially no risk. Any sane person knew that jabbing children was all risk for no reward. But, we did it anyway. We chose risk the lives of children so that Pfizer could make a profit.
When the lockdowns were announced I spoke out. Every useful idiot that I spoke to could not tell me how any of the restrictions would work against an airborne pathogen. All they had to offer was the mantra “if it can save only one life”. Well I know how we could have saved millions of lives. Don’t give an experimental treatment to low risk people many of whom were children. Why weren’t we as concerned for the lives of children as we were for the lives of seniors? We should all be ashamed.