What is the purpose of a Medication with no Benefits?

Dr. Peter McCullough has just co-authored a paper calling for a halt to the COVID vaccination programs.

COVID-19 should be halted until accurate pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and genotoxicity studies are performed, or they should only be delivered in circumstances when the benefits greatly outweigh the risks.

The authors did extend an olive branch to the vaccine criminals with the last part of the statement.  Governments can back away by saying that vaccines will be reserved for high risk groups where the “benefits outweigh the potential as yet undefined risks”.  This is of course just cover fire for a strategic retreat because there are not any circumstances when the benefits greatly outweigh the risks.

The COVID vaccines are all pain for no gain.  They are responsible for millions of injuries with the most common one being COVID.

 

In the history of vaccines no vaccine has ever increased the prevalence of the target disease until now.  Why on earth would we continue to mandate the use of a treatment that makes the disease worse?  Was government disappointed COVID was not killing enough people all on its own?

1 reply
  1. Trevor
    Trevor says:

    The average person is too gullible and ignorant of their surroundings to know that the vaccines are deadly and just trust the politicians. The average politician is too evil to admit the vaccines are deadly even though they have that knowledge.

    It’s a dangerous recipe.
    It’s kind of like the “Darwin awards” on a colossal scale.

Comments are closed.