Trudeau’s Canada is a kingdom of Stupidity and Lies

/4 Comments/in /by

I usually peruse the internet for interesting articles or information to discuss on this blog.  There are days when I stumble across something that gives me a visceral reaction.  Something that I cannot stop myself from commenting on; today is just such a day.  I don’t know why Canadian media triggers me.  You would think after 6 decades I would accept that journalists are a bunch of unintelligent, dishonest boobs. Sadly it seems the media and deep state will always be able to push my buttons.

The article that set me off today is this gem from the national post by Sharon Kirkey.  This article displays everything that plagues Canada.  Group think by professional associations.  Slavish adherence to ridiculous government policy and reporting that functions as nothing other than propaganda.

The article purports to report news that 2 Ontario doctors have lost their license to practice.  Of course it is much more than that.  Sharon Kirkey does not miss a chance to repeat the idiotic ramblings of the Ontario College of physicians as the missing third tablet from Mount Sinai.

Two Ontario doctors accused of spreading COVID misinformation, including one who provided groundless vaccine exemptions to 168 people, attesting that the shots would expose them to “unacceptable medical risk,”

Take a minute to read that statement again.  Vaccine exemptions are groundless.  According to the Ontario College of physicians there can be no reason not to take the deadliest vaccine in history.  These doctors lost their license for protecting their patients and dispensing sound medical advice.  For every age group the vaccines are an unacceptable risk.  They do not prevent infection, transmission, or death and come with a host of undesirable side effects including sudden death.  How could a group of physicians tasked with enforcing standards not bother to do 5 minutes of research?

You cannot save Canada.  Every single professional association, media organization, and government bureaucracy is hopelessly incompetent and corrupt.  When I was born Canada had endless promise.  That potential is gone; it was stolen by woke idiots.  I can’t find the words necessary to apologize to my children.

Profit above all else

/in /by

The most important assumption when it came to COVID vaccines was that it stayed in the shoulder muscle.  That assumption was wrong and we knew that from the very early days of the vaccination program.  Discovering that the lipid nanoparticles rapidly moved throughout the body should have been enough to stop vaccinating.  Instead we continued on, hoping that it would not be a problem.

Fast forward 2 years and millions of lives and we now have documented proof that the jabs can damage almost every system and organ in the body.

 

These things should be banned yet we continue even with scientific proof they are causing more harm than good.  What will it take to stop this and why did it take this long to even get here?  During the abbreviate 2 month Pfizer trial more people died in the vaccine group than the placebo group.  Pfizer and the FDA ignored those deaths because they were not COVID related but no one stopped to ask what did cause them.

There is only one way to know whether or not the vaccine caused any of the deaths in the 21 vaccinated patients who died: proper histopathology.

Pfizer never did it and the FDA never asked for it.

This whole game was rigged from the start.  Not only were the vaccine trials obviously fraudulent but there were always better and simpler solutions than experimental gene therapy.  COVID is the most treatable disease in history.  It responds to vitamin D and safe re-purposed drugs.  It even responds to zinc supplements and nasal irrigation.

 

There are many reasons to stop the vaccine programs but only one to continue; profit.  The COVID vaccines are a story of ruthlessly pursuing profit at the expense of human life.  The mantra during the lockdowns was that if it could save just one life.  In 2020 that one life was very valuable.  In a post vax world life could not be any less valuable.

Manufacturing Scientific Consensus

/in /by

I have a question I could use some help with.  To preface it let’s review the definition of Irony according to the Cambridge dictionary.

A situation in which something which was intended to have a particular result has the opposite or a very different result:

So here is my question.  Does a scientist who loses her funding and research for studying whether scientists are intimidated into silence count as Irony?

A university has “confiscated” the findings of an academic studying Britain’s gender wars in a row over her “dangerous” research data, The Telegraph can reveal.

She never even finished her research and the government stepped in to confiscate her dangerous data.  Notice the government did not confiscate the data because it was fraudulent only because it was dangerous.  Just another time government intervenes for your safety I guess.  Wouldn’t it be nice if just once government asked us if we felt unsafe before they censored information?

I don’t know if this is truly irony but I do know this is how Government manufactures scientific consensus.  It is easy to get scientists to agree when you punish the ones who don’t.  Scientists are not saints they are people with mortgages and car payments.  Advancing science takes a back seat to feeding their families.  That is why we see so few scientists step out of line.

We saw this during COVID.  A Red Deer Alberta doctor was fired on the spot for using Ivermectin to treat 8 critically ill COVID patients in his ICU.  Thanks to his intervention all 8 patients recovered quickly but the doctor never got his job back for defying government.  Hospitals in Canada are run by the government and the Jason Kenney government already had plans for these 8 people.  They were supposed to die so that they could fuel COVID propaganda.

Saving 8 people was not part of the plan; this could not be allowed to happen again.  Doctors had to be reminded to get with the program and be part of the consensus.  Premier Jason Kenney easily manufactured a consensus about Ivermectin by persecuting one doctor.  Ivermectin is dangerous.  Not for the patient but for any doctor that would dare use it.

The heavy hand of government is also behind the climate change consensus.  Government doles out large grants to scientist willing to say the earth is in jeopardy.  As long as the hoax continues the gravy train continues and they all know it.  The scammers need no more incentive than that to justify attacking critics who challenge the narrative.

Judith Curry was labeled a climate heretic for simply noting that the case for anthropogenic climate change was not as certain as some scientists suggest.  Basically she politely said that the climate alarmist crowd was doing sloppy science and need to pull up their socks.  At the time Judith Curry was the head of the earth and atmospheric studies department at the Georgia institute of Technology.  She ultimately lost that job for refusing to climb aboard the climate change express.

A similar thing happened to Willie Soon.  Willie Soon is an astrophysicist that had the gall to not only point out that the climate models are wrong but to show exactly why they were wrong.  For the crime of advancing science Willie Soon was hounded out of his job and for a time did not even do any climate research.  It just wasn’t worth being subject to the abuse that came with telling the truth.

Dr. Soon is back doing climate research and recently gave a presentation to the heartland institute.  His presentation shows the recent warming is explained completely by increased sun activity.  All that is needed to reach this conclusion is uncontaminated data and, you know, actual science.  Watch for yourself and tell me if this is a man who deserves persecution.

 

The real crime here is that the government is using your tax dollars to stifle real science.  It is not an accident that a scientific consensus always forms supporting government objectives.  Your money is being used to purchase a consensus and eliminate any dissenting voices.  That fake consensus is then used to justify taking even more money from you.  It is a vicious circle of taxpayer funded fake science.

Dishonesty fuels Manufacture Emergencies

/in /by

Dishonesty was at the root of COVID hysteria.  People were driven to panic by government Officials that were using data that they knew to be false.  Not every death is a COVID death.  Everyone knows this including the people who printed COVID on every death certificate.  They knew they were lying but they did it anyway because they were paid to lie.

The same is true of the PCR tests.  A positive result on a PCR test is meaningless.  The man who invented the technique, Kari Mullis, said so on camera.  The people using the test knew the data was meaningless.  They knew they were lying but they did it anyway because they were paid to lie.

It wasn’t hard for government to create wide spread institutional lying about COVID because they have done it before.  Government has kept climate Change hysteria alive for decades using the same technique.  Most of the data researchers use to maintain the narrative is false or misleading.  They know they are lying but they do it anyway because they are paid to lie.

Researchers mislead by cherry picking low points to extrapolate from.  There is a reason temperature plots always start at either 1850 or 1970.  1850 is the end of the little ice age, a very cold period, it is a good thing that temperatures rose since then but it is always presented as dangerous.  The 1970s were the coldest period in the 20th century.  Temperatures were bound to rise since they had fallen dramatically going in to the 70s.  When it comes to the earth 50 years is a blink of the eye.  Starting extrapolations from the 1970s means you are ignoring more than 99.999999% of the data.

Cherry picking brief periods of time for extrapolations is misleading.  Using data that you know to be wrong is fraud and climate scientists use a lot of data that they know is wrong.  Before Climate change became so lucrative, real scientists used to study something known as the urban heat island (UHI) effect but you don’t hear much about it now.  UHI gets ignored because it proves the data from most climate stations is wrong and climate scientists want to use that data.  If they can’t use it they can’t scare you.

Cities are hot.  Humans have known this for centuries.  That is why rich people keep country homes; to escape the heat of the city.  Concrete and asphalt absorb a lot of the sun’s energy and buildings with central heat lose heat to the environment.  Thermometers inside cities always read higher than the surrounding rural areas.  Most temperature monitoring stations are inside cities so the data from them should not be used but, it is used because it shows more “climate change”.

If researchers were honest they would only use temperature readings from climate stations in rural areas but even those measurements are biased.  Temperature monitoring stations used to be mercury thermometers that must be read manually.  It was very time consuming to send people to remote locations to read the data so when the technology evolved mercury thermometers were replaced for convenience.  This introduced a larger error than you might think.

Thermometers were replaced with electrical devices that could be read remotely.  The problem is that electricity is a source of heat so the electronic devices can read higher than the mercury thermometers.  So the obvious questions are; how much higher, and are the readings adjusted down to compensate?   Well now, thanks to Jennifer Marohasy, we know the answer to those questions.

Dr Marohasy said the BOM had not disputed that the probe at Brisbane Airport had recorded up to 0.7C warmer than the ­mercury at the same site at the same time.

And no, the readings are not adjusted down because they show an extra 0.7 degrees of warming which helps with the scare mongering.  So what is the big deal with 0.7 degrees of imaginary warming?  Like all data it needs to be put in context.  We are constantly told we must all live in mud huts and grow our own vegetables to keep the earth from warming 1.5 degrees.  0.7 degrees of imaginary warming puts us ½ ways there already.

These charlatans know they are using crap data to keep this fraud alive.  This is not an innocent mistake or it would not have taken 9 years and a freedom of information request for them to admit the new devices read higher than the old ones.  Climate change is not a problem and has very little to do with CO2.  Science has always known this.

 

For 99.98% of earth’s history CO2 levels were much higher than they are now.  During that time the earth was both much warmer and much colder than it is now.  As Dr. Pilmer points out CO2 was never a problem or primary driver of climate for more than 4 billion years so why do we think it is now?

Will Peak Stupidity herald a return to logic?

/in /by

The COVID vaccines were supposed to end the pandemic.  All you had to do was roll up your sleeve and accept an experimental treatment and everything would go back to normal.  Except of course nothing went back to normal.  People are still dying of COVID and not because they are unvaccinated.

In every highly vaccinated country the majority of COVID infections and Deaths have been since the advent of vaccine programs.  The vaccines did not just fail, like every other government enforced mitigation measure, the jabs made things worse.  The COVID vaccines are the first vaccine in history that makes the recipient more likely to die of the disease.

People in the United States who have received COVID-19 boosters in many states are more likely than those who have gotten just a primary series to get infected, receive hospital care, and die, according to an Epoch Times investigation.

Even without any side effects the COVID vaccines would be net negative.  They increased the number of people who died of COVID.  Unfortunately for all the people who were coerced and even compelled to take the jabs COVID is not the only vaccine injury caused by the COVID vaccines.  Millions of people have died suddenly and millions more have been disabled all while being ignored by their government.

Officially no single cause of the unprecedented rise in sudden death and disabilities has been identified.  Attributing it to the vax is my own assessment and I have now medical training.  But I am also not an idiot. I can put 2 and 2 together.  I do recognize that injecting everyone on earth with known toxins will not be without problems.  There are, however, people with medical training who disagree with me.  People like Dr. Califf who believes sudden death is caused by being exposed to the wrong information.

According to Dr. Califf’s logic, misinformation is so powerful that it increases death rates, causing sudden heart attacks, strokes, infant deaths, and more.

“It’s looking worse, not better, over the last several years,” Califf told CNBC in an interview Thursday at the agency’s headquarters in Silver Spring, Maryland.

Not being a medical professional myself I am not certain how he determined this.  Perhaps he exposed rats to CNN or CBC and timed how long it took the rats to die.  All I know is that the problem has been solved.  As soon as we let Justin Trudeau start censoring the internet this will all be over, in more ways than one.

In the 2010s there was a lot of talk about peak oil.  Deep thinkers said we were on the cusp of demand always exceeding supply.  We would be forced to stop using oil because we were running out.  They were not really correct with their assessment but it does make me wonder.  Have we reached peak stupidity yet?  Can we finally stop using it?  What would a world without stupidity even look like?  I don’t know but I would love to find out.

Climate Change numbers never add up

/in /by

I have posted multiple times about how the cult of climate change uses fraudulent science to bolster their claims.  The basic science behind CO2 is very simple and well known.  CO2 is a greenhouse gas and adding more will cause the atmosphere to warm.  No one disputes that.  What skeptics do dispute is how much warming we will see.

Most gases cannot absorb radiant energy.  That is why objects left in the sun heat up more than the air around them.  A small group of gases called greenhouse gases do absorb radiant energy but they are not particularly good at it.  CO2 is only able to absorb energy across very narrow band widths and there is not much energy available in those bandwidths.  That is why adding more makes very little difference; there just isn’t much energy for it to capture.

All scientists acknowledge this.  The difference between the alarmists and more rational scientists is that the alarmists believe there are feedback mechanisms that will amplify the warming.  Where their case falls apart is observations of the natural system.  There is simply no evidence of this enhanced warming.

Most scientists that look at the historical data conclude that the earth will warm from 1 to 2 degrees and their estimates have tended to get lower with time.  Of course there are still scientists who claim much higher levels of future warming; money can buy any answer you want.  So when the government and media speak about climate change they use the ridiculous estimates that are the outliers not the “consensus” they always prattle on about.

The media never tells you that they are using the highest possible estimates.  They also never tell you that even the most ridiculous estimates of warming are still not a problem.  The UN IPCC is the largest purveyor of climate “disinformation”.  The UN uses the highest possible estimates of warming and predicts calamity.  What they don’t advertise that even in their unrealistic scenarios it still costs more to prevent climate change than to adapt to it.

Even if you believe the alarmists trying to prevent climate change is a waste of money because climate change has negligible impact on the economy.  The following is The IPCC’s own assessment of the future cost of climate change.

In its fifth and latest (full) report, the IPCC estimates that a 3° warming — twice the Paris Agreement target — would reduce global economic growth by 3%. Three per cent a year? No, 3% by the year 2100. This amount represents a reduction in global economic growth of 0.04% a year, a number that is barely measurable statistically. That is in the IPCC’s pessimistic scenario. In the more optimistic scenarios, the economic impact of warming will be virtually non-existent. The IPCC, AR5, Working Group II, chapter 10 states:

“For most economic sectors, the impact of climate change will be small relative to the impacts of other drivers…. Changes in population, age, income, technology, relative prices… and many other aspects of socioeconomic development will have an impact on the supply and demand of economic goods and services that is largely relative to the impact of climate change.”

Even the IPCC admits we have much larger problems than climate change so why do we spend so much money on climate change?  The truth is that climate change is not a serious problem but it is the perfect political issue.  You can use it as an excuse to steal and as long as you do something you can claim success.  If the weather warms you can claim it would have been worse had you not acted.  If the earth cools you can tout how incredibly successful your policies are.

Conversely doing nothing is potential political suicide.  If the earth warms at all your political opponents will seize on it to prove you are negligent and destroying the planet.  No politician will take that chance.  They would rather destroy your life than risk their own career.  Climate alarmism is not sound science.  The numbers just don’t add up.  Any way you slice it climate change is not a problem.  Climate alarmism only survives because it is good politics.

Updating the Hippocratic Oath

/in /by

“First do no harm” was said by Hippocrates but is not actually part of the Hippocratic Oath that some doctors take.  This is what they do say as part of the oath.

“I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous.”

It is basically impossible for a doctor to do no harm because every medical intervention carries some risk.  I guess that is why “first do no harm” does not show up in the oath.  It would prevent doctors from doing their job.  So what did Hippocrates mean when he said “first do no harm”?  Well, I can’t be certain since Hippocrates died almost 2400 years ago but this is what I think he meant.  When the harm from a treatment is balanced with the benefit of the treatment make sure you do not land on the harm side of the ledger.

“First do no harm” is a reference to the destination not the road you took to get there.  When you finish the patient should be better off than when you started.  But even when you apply this more nuanced interpretation of “first do no harm” you still cannot explain the COVID vaccines.  Almost no one was at risk from COVID.  There was no discernable benefit to young healthy people but there was a high level of uncertainty to this new medical treatment.  Any doctor concerned about staying off the harm side of the ledger would not have administered the jabs to anyone other than high risk patients.  So why did they all do it?

A general rule is that people do things for love or money and when it comes to the COVID vax cash is king.  Doctors were given very lucrative incentives to use the jabs.  It was even an escalating incentive where each successive jab was worth more than the last.

Doctors abandoned medical ethics for money.  There was no benefit for most of their patients that they jabbed; only risk.  How many of their patients died to service their greed?

I guess after 2400 years it is time to update the Hippocratic Oath to reflect the realities of modern medicine.  The guiding principle of “first do no harm” should be re-written “First do no harm, unless it is profitable”.

The Cult of Climate change is delusional

/in /by

I was scrolling through twitter a couple days ago and a climate change lunatic challenged Climate change critics to produce the paper proving CO2 did not cause climate change.  This is how inverted reality is for these lunatics.  The onus is not on skeptics to prove anything because it is not the skeptics who insist on shutting down industries and hobbling economies.

This inverted logic is endemic on the left.  They insist that the world must change to suit their whims unless we can provide proof that their ridiculous ideas are wrong.  Extraordinary claims should come with extraordinary proof yet they insist the burden of proof falls on us.  We must pay carbon taxes unless we can prove that destroying the Canadian economy will not stop climate change.  Of course only a fool can follow that logic but it is explained here by just such a fool.

 

The world will die if Canadians are allowed to heat their homes.  Isn’t that just intuitive?  If you don’t believe it, the cult members have a computer simulation they can show you.  Their latest simulations now depict the cataclysmic effects we can expect from heating our homes.  Unfortunately the cultists were unable to sway opinions with their play station science.  It seems normal rational people are not alarmed by simulations that look like the video games everyone plays.

“Unfortunately, our results suggest that ‘seeing is not believing’, especially for climate sceptics,” he added.

The skeptics are not responsible for refuting the wild claims of these lunatics.  It is up to them to do it and frankly in more than 3 decades they have simply not been able to do that.  There is another recent study of satellite data showing warming has been only ½ of what the lunatics predicted.

Zou’s team notes that their findings “have strong implications for trends in climate model simulations and other observations” because the atmosphere has warmed at half the average rate predicted by climate models over the same period. 

The earth is just not as sensitive to CO2 as the climate cult tells you.  We have seen only ½ the warming they predicted and it should be noted that there is no proof any of this warming was caused by CO2.  We have only had satellites since the 1970s.  Anyone 60 or older will tell you the 1970s were brutally cold.  Back then scientist were predicting global cooling.

Temperatures dropped dramatically from 1940 to 1970 when CO2 was rising.  Temperatures have been rising since the 70s but if you only use the uncontaminated rural weather stations we have only recovered to where we were 100 years ago.  It is entirely possible that the warming recorded by satellites had nothing to do with CO2.  That is how certain their science is.  They can’t even show that CO2 has caused any warming.  Does that sound like a good reason to destroy the economy and your personal finances?

CO2 is a greenhouse gas and increasing CO2 concentrations should cause some warming but that warming will be small, 1 to 2 degrees Celsius.  There are multiple peer reviewed papers that come to that conclusion.  That level of warming will not be dangerous.  In fact it will be highly beneficial especially to northern nations like Canada.  The extra CO2 will also dramatically increase crop yields; it is plant food after all.

Here is the inconvenient truth about Global warming that the climate lunatics do not want you to hear.  There is no downside to higher CO2 concentrations; it will be beneficial across the board.  The only place that CO2 induced Climate change is dangerous is in the bowels of their fraudulent computer models.  They are delusional and live inside their own computer simulations.

Long COVID is rooted in COVID policy

/in /by

There is a new study out about the health effects of prolonged mask use.  Masks cannot stop a virus but they do impede respiration.  By making it harder to inhale and exhale masks lower blood oxygen levels and causes an accumulation of CO2.  Basically masks mimic some of the more dangerous aspects of COVID.  It truly is incomprehensible that any medical professional would have endorsed masks yet almost all of them did.  With mask mandates we conducted a huge and immoral experiment on the long term effects of prolonged hypoxia and guess what?  It looks a lot like long COVID.

Overlapping of face mask effects (MIES) with long-COVID-19 symptoms

Regarding the numerous mask symptoms an important question arises: Can masks be responsible for a misinterpreted long-COVID-19-syndrome after an effectively treated COVID-19 infection? Nearly 40% of main long-COVID-19 symptoms (171) overlap with mask related complaints and symptoms described by Kisielinski et al. as MIES (14) like fatigue, dyspnea, confusion, anxiety, depression, tachycardia, dizziness, and headache, which we also detected in the qualitative and quantitative analysis of face mask effects in our systematic review. It is possible that some symptoms attributed to long-COVID-19 are predominantly mask-related. Further research on this phenomenon needs to be conducted.

But don’t blame our medical establishment for these problems.  I mean how could they have possibly known that partial asphyxiation for 3 years could cause a problem?  It was only untrained lunatics like me that thought this could be a problem.

https://truthaboutcovid.ca/lockdowns-are-evil-is-that-why-politicians-love-them/

Locking people in their homes with their Sani wipes and disinfectant sprays is very damaging to their immune systems.  The only way you can make it worse is if you force a mask on them.  Masks restrict breathing turning us all into asthmatics.  Hypoxia is a condition of chronically low oxygen levels.  One of the problems associated with hypoxia is depressed immune system response.

Long COVID is a difficult nut to crack since mask induced hypoxia is not the only condition that has symptoms resembling long COVID.  Again not being a medical professional I have produced this comparison table to help lay people like me understand this perplexing riddle.

 

Long COVID Symptom Known Mask Induced Hypoxia Symptom? Documented COVID Vaccine injury
Fatigue

 

 Yes Yes
Symptoms that get worse after physical or mental effort Yes Yes
Fever   Yes
Neurological symptoms or mental health conditions, including difficulty thinking or concentrating, headache, sleep problems, dizziness when you stand, pins-and-needles feeling, loss of smell or taste, and depression or anxiety Yes Yes
Joint or muscle pain   Yes
Heart symptoms or conditions, including chest pain and fast or pounding heartbeat Yes Yes
Digestive symptoms, including diarrhea and stomach pain   Yes
Blood clots and blood vessel (vascular) issues, including a blood clot that travels to the lungs from deep veins in the legs and blocks blood flow to the lungs (pulmonary embolism) Yes Yes
Other symptoms, such as a rash and changes in the menstrual cycle   Yes

 

The government was really not taking any chances were they?  They were determined to make people sick for a very long time and they succeeded.  If you have not figured it out by now I will give you some solid gold health advice.  Stop listening to government.  Your life and long term health literally depends on it.

They Lied for a Reason

/in /by

When COVID restrictions were first announced my immediate reaction was that this was just stupid people doing stupid things out of fear.  The restrictions were so ridiculous that I was certain that it would not take long for people to come to their senses.  I was wrong about both.  The restrictions were not stupid they were intentional and the public never did come to their senses.

After a few weeks it was plain to me the government had ulterior motives.  They justified nonsensical restrictions with the excuse that the virus was new and we could take no chances.  This was largely a lie because coronaviruses and airborne respiratory virus were not new.  We had enough information and knowledge to know that what we were doing would not work.  In fact in the early days of the “pandemic” we even had rational discussions on national broadcasts.

 

 

Clearly we knew enough in the spring of 2020 to know that COVID was not an emergency.  People in Government had to have known this, so it is impossible to conclude that they were not lying.  They were lying about everything.

 

Despite government’s unblemished track record for lying, some people are still reluctant to believe government was lying about COVID.  They just can’t see how incredibly beneficial lockdowns were to government.  Lockdowns gave government many very valuable things. With lockdowns government successfully;

  1. Set a precedent that government could suspend human rights indefinitely by declaring an emergency without any need for proving we had an emergency.
  2. Established that people would accept a caste system where government could selectively grant rights to some while denying them to others. What caste you are placed in depends on your level of government compliance.
  3. Conditioned people to carry proof of government compliance (vaccine passports).
  4. Transferred wealth from ordinary people to the elite.

Lockdowns were the most successful government program in history.  We voluntarily allowed government to imprison and impoverish us.  Do you really think we would be dealing with 15 minute cities now if we had stood up in 2020 and said no?

They lied, and lied, and lied; none of this happened by accident.  Government got exactly what they wanted and they will do it again unless they are punished.  We need to start locking people up and not people who don’t wear masks or choose to go to church.  Every politician and bureaucrat that had a hand in this lie needs to face prison time.