The Cult of Climate change is delusional

I was scrolling through twitter a couple days ago and a climate change lunatic challenged Climate change critics to produce the paper proving CO2 did not cause climate change.  This is how inverted reality is for these lunatics.  The onus is not on skeptics to prove anything because it is not the skeptics who insist on shutting down industries and hobbling economies.

This inverted logic is endemic on the left.  They insist that the world must change to suit their whims unless we can provide proof that their ridiculous ideas are wrong.  Extraordinary claims should come with extraordinary proof yet they insist the burden of proof falls on us.  We must pay carbon taxes unless we can prove that destroying the Canadian economy will not stop climate change.  Of course only a fool can follow that logic but it is explained here by just such a fool.

 

The world will die if Canadians are allowed to heat their homes.  Isn’t that just intuitive?  If you don’t believe it, the cult members have a computer simulation they can show you.  Their latest simulations now depict the cataclysmic effects we can expect from heating our homes.  Unfortunately the cultists were unable to sway opinions with their play station science.  It seems normal rational people are not alarmed by simulations that look like the video games everyone plays.

“Unfortunately, our results suggest that ‘seeing is not believing’, especially for climate sceptics,” he added.

The skeptics are not responsible for refuting the wild claims of these lunatics.  It is up to them to do it and frankly in more than 3 decades they have simply not been able to do that.  There is another recent study of satellite data showing warming has been only ½ of what the lunatics predicted.

Zou’s team notes that their findings “have strong implications for trends in climate model simulations and other observations” because the atmosphere has warmed at half the average rate predicted by climate models over the same period. 

The earth is just not as sensitive to CO2 as the climate cult tells you.  We have seen only ½ the warming they predicted and it should be noted that there is no proof any of this warming was caused by CO2.  We have only had satellites since the 1970s.  Anyone 60 or older will tell you the 1970s were brutally cold.  Back then scientist were predicting global cooling.

Temperatures dropped dramatically from 1940 to 1970 when CO2 was rising.  Temperatures have been rising since the 70s but if you only use the uncontaminated rural weather stations we have only recovered to where we were 100 years ago.  It is entirely possible that the warming recorded by satellites had nothing to do with CO2.  That is how certain their science is.  They can’t even show that CO2 has caused any warming.  Does that sound like a good reason to destroy the economy and your personal finances?

CO2 is a greenhouse gas and increasing CO2 concentrations should cause some warming but that warming will be small, 1 to 2 degrees Celsius.  There are multiple peer reviewed papers that come to that conclusion.  That level of warming will not be dangerous.  In fact it will be highly beneficial especially to northern nations like Canada.  The extra CO2 will also dramatically increase crop yields; it is plant food after all.

Here is the inconvenient truth about Global warming that the climate lunatics do not want you to hear.  There is no downside to higher CO2 concentrations; it will be beneficial across the board.  The only place that CO2 induced Climate change is dangerous is in the bowels of their fraudulent computer models.  They are delusional and live inside their own computer simulations.