For more than 2 years Governments have successfully ignored COVID vaccine injuries but that is becoming increasingly difficult.  Too many people have been injured and some of those unfortunate soles have discovered that their injuries are permanent.

How is this interview not on every news outlet? Myocarditis from the vaccine is real… 👇🏼pic.twitter.com/SBMsnMrnuL

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) October 20, 2023

As Dr. Drew points out Pfizer did not commit this crime on their own.  They had a lot of help.  Help that does not have the legal protection Pfizer was granted.

Pfizer can’t be sued but everyone else involved in this crime can be.  Every doctor and nurse that administered the jabs without informed consent is at risk.  The same goes for media outlets that constantly exaggerated the risk of COVID and the effectiveness of the vaccines.

We do seem to finally be at an inflection point.  The guilty parties know it and are worried of legal ramifications.  The whole argument that the benefit outweighs the risks can no longer be supported.  Something I have been pointing out since the spring of 2021 when the Vaccines were being pushed on low risk groups.  There is no way to justify the jab mandates.  Governments need to find a way to spin this before lynch mobs form.  The Canadian government has chosen to blame quality control.

Health Canada has confirmed the presence of a Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA sequence in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which the manufacturer had not previously disclosed. There is debate among scientists with regards to the significance of the finding, with some saying it has the potential to cause cancer, and others saying it poses little to no threat.

This information is not new.  I have discussed it before in previous posts.  It was largely ignored until Politicians decided it is a possible way to absolve them of responsibility.  The Jab injuries were simply not their fault.  How can they be expected to enforce quality control on products manufactured in foreign countries?  I doubt this is going to sit well with Canadians.  At least a few won’t accept this as an excuse for mass murder.

While the Canadian government is trying to spin this as an unfortunate circumstance beyond their control, the German government is taking a more aggressive stance.  They are kidnapping people who speak out.

The charges against Fuellmich remain unclear at this point, but he was reportedly lured into the German embassy in Mexico, where he was kidnapped. What are his charges? It was not an arrest as he has not committed a crime. He was led to believe that he was exchanging his passport at the embassy when he was taken away.

All of this smacks of desperation.  The deep thinkers in government did not have the foresight Pfizer did.  Pfizer would not get involved without legal protection.  That should have caused everyone involved in this crime to opt out.  At the very least they should have sought the same protection that was given to Pfizer.  They did not and now they are worried.

Thousands of people jumped on the COVID jab gravy train but only a handful has legal protection.  I can’t wait to see this play out.

Like many people I remember where I was and what I was doing on 9/11.  I was the operations manager for the company and I was travelling to one of our field offices.  When I got there I found that no one was working.  Everyone was gathered in the lunch room watching events unfold on television.  When I walked into the lunch room the towers were on fire and the media was already blaming Osama Bin Laden.  I remember wondering how they could have that information so quickly.

Then as time passed we learned that it was in fact Bin Laden but we also learned other troubling information.  The FBI had been warned about the suspicious behavior of some of the hijackers and the CIA had been warned by other intelligence agencies that Bin Laden was planning a major attack.  This information could be interpreted in one of 2 ways;

1. The FBI and CIA were incredibly incompetent

Or,

2. They knew it was going to happen and they let it happen.

The second option may be hard to accept but at the time things were relatively stable and media was discussing the peace dividend.  The benefit of world stability was that we could spend less on the military and intelligence gathering apparatus.  Very powerful agencies were staring down the barrel of budget cuts but all of that changed after a sensational attack.

So early on I concluded that 9/11 was allowed to happen and it was about Money.  I had not even considered the largest expense.  How much money would be spent occupying Afghanistan?  The US spent over $2 trillion occupying Afghanistan for 20 years to search for a man that was not even in the country.  Fortunes were made but nothing changed.  The Taliban is in charge again.

I believe 9/11 was allowed to happen so that a select few could get very rich.  Americans were tricked into supporting this by an event that evoked a strong emotional response.  To me the October 7^th Hamas attack felt an awful lot like 9/11.  It was a horrific attack that left me asking similar questions.  Could the Mossad and IDF have been that incompetent?  Why people left were alone for so long and why were those people unarmed?  Military service is compulsory in Israel.  Why are trained reservists not allowed to keep firearms?

To me the only real difference between 9/11 and October 7^th was that I could not see a motive.  Oct 7^th did not look like it was about money.  But, just because I could not see a motive, it did not mean there was no motive.  A couple days ago I came across this video that discusses a plausible motive.

Did Israel allow the Hamas attack?

In 2017, Israel's finance minister outlined the 'Decisive Plan' to complete the ethnic cleansing of Palestine and restore Israel from 'river to sea'.

This plan would need a big event to turn international opinion.

Video made by @DarkVivek2024 pic.twitter.com/zd9jwqJZqM

— Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) October 15, 2023

Both 9/11 and October 7^th may or may not have been allowed to happen but one thing is certain; both are being exploited by people with agendas.  They are using our emotional reaction to a terrible event to implement an already crafted plan.  This is a tactic that has been used successful several times in my life time alone.  COVID, 9/11, weapons of mass destruction, killing babies in incubators, in each case we reacted with emotion and got the same results.  Money was stolen and people died unnecessarily.  We need to stop allowing ourselves to be manipulated.  Not every event demands immediate unthinking action.  We do not need to get involved in a conflict in the Middle East.

I know this post will anger people on both sides.  Many people have entrenched opinions about who is the hero and who is the villain in the Israelis – Palestinian conflict.  To those people I say fine.  If you are convinced one side is right, volunteer to fight or send money.  Just don’t volunteer someone else’s life or someone else’s money.  We do not need to take a stand on every conflict.  When someone asks you where you stand on this issue just tell them you are “standing back^***”.

Note^***                                 these words are in quotation because they are not mine.  I took them from someone I follow on twitter/X.  I don’t remember who it was but if they are reading this they will know and I want to thank them for giving me the right words to end this post.

Another study has found a mysterious rise in cardiac arrests.  The researchers are mystified that the answer could not be found where the government told them to look.

The researchers did not factor in vaccination status, however.

Instead, they sought to examine the impact of COVID-19 on out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.

Government financed academics have once again proven that you cannot find answers you refuse to look for.  The willful blindness is astonishing.  Anyone who is not a moron (a group that I admit includes few politicians) knows what is causing this.  The only good news is that it seems the worst could be behind us.  According to Euromomo, the only group still suffering unusually high excess deaths is children.

Children should never have been part of this deadly money making adventure but they were.  As the last to be vaccinated the negative vaccine effects have yet to subside as they have in other age groups.  But, to be clear while the worst is over this is not over.  Many people will now deal with lingering vaccine injuries possibly for the rest of their lives.

I have a colleague who told me 8 months ago that he had developed pericarditis from his booster.  I saw him last week for the first time since then.  His heart damage has made him weak and he now struggles to walk.  His doctor is searching for ways to help but the damage has been done.  He is unfortunately only one of millions who have had their lives permanently altered.

So what should we do with the people who perpetrated this assault?  Justin Trudeau will say there was no assault because no one was forced to take the vaccine.  Technically that is true.  My colleague was not forced to take the vaccine he was forced to make a terrible decision.  He has a large family that depends on his income.  His income depends on his ability to travel which depended on his vaccination status.  So, he could choose to abandon his responsibility as a husband and father or he could take a chance with another jab; some choice.

People have died and lives have been irreparably harmed.  Someone has to pay.  The greedy bastards that put profits ahead of people’s lives must be prosecuted and many of those greedy bastards are elected officials.  Everyone involved with jab mandates need to face prosecution.

The Supreme Court of Canada just ruled that Justin Trudeau’s Bill C 69 was largely unconstitutional.  Bill C69 gives jurisdiction of absolutely everything to the Federal government if the feds deem the environmental impact sufficiently large.  Basically it is power grab by Justin Trudeau.  It is his attempt to do an end run around the constitution.

The way that the Canadian Constitution is written the federal government is supposed to be in charge of very little.  This annoys federal politicians because they view themselves as omnipotent superior beings who should have the final say on everything.  The traditional way around the constitution has always been hold tax dollars hostage.  The federal government over taxes citizens then promises to return some of the money to the provinces if the province agrees to do things the way Ottawa wants them done.  This was not enough for Justin Trudeau so he passed a law that allows him to override provinces whenever he wants.

The law was clearly unconstitutional yet this ruling was quite unexpected because the Canadian Supreme court does not have a great track record of upholding the constitution.  Judicial appointments in Canada are political and unlike the US there is no public vetting so Canadians are largely unaware that Judges are political insiders.  They are appointed based on ideological purity not judicial expertise.  Even with this rare ruling the ideological influence is apparent in the opinions of the dissenting judges.

Dissenting Justices Andromache Karakatsanis and Mahmud Jamal wrote that they believed the act was constitutional in its entirety. 

“Environmental protection requires action by all levels of government because each — whether by action or inaction — can affect the environment,” the dissenting opinion reads.

“This shared responsibility is ‘neither unusual nor unworkable’ in a federal state such as Canada. Rather, it reflects this Court’s flexible approach to federalism, which recognizes that overlapping powers are unavoidable and intergovernmental cooperation is essential.”

There is no shared responsibility in the constitution and the court is not supposed to have a flexible approach to anything.  Judges are not supposed to read things in to laws that are not there and were never meant to be there, but these judges do.  In their opinion anything they feel is important, like environmental protection, should override the constitution.

This is precisely why Canadians found themselves without legal protection during COVID.  Every single COVID mitigation measure violated individual rights but too few judges in Canada care about individual rights or the law.  It is about what the feel to be correct.  COVID tyranny was the natural outcome of a judiciary corrupted by politics and ideology.  The courts should have protected us but they did not.  Too many judges are just overgrown children who think their feelings are the only thing that matters.  Thomas Sowell said it best.

Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good. In area after area – crime, education, housing, race relations – the situation has gotten worse after the bright new theories were put into operation. The amazing thing is that this history of failure and disaster has neither discouraged the social engineers nor discredited them. 

The cost of housing in Canada has exploded.  The reason for this is simple.  Supply has not kept up with demand.  The reason for that is also simple; Government caused another expensive problem.  Since taking office Justin Trudeau has dramatically ramped up immigration and refugee acceptance.  Canada has always taken in a lot of people relative to our size as a nation.  For years this number was relatively stable but now Trudeau has increased the number by 600%.  There is no way to find homes for these people without increasing how many homes we build each year and that has not happened, also because of government.

Governments love regulations because regulations require bureaucrats to enforce and increased taxes to pay the bureaucrats. Some regulations are necessary; most are not.  Most regulations are just the way bureaucrats justify their existence and high salaries.  Canada has a lot of bureaucrats and regulations which always spawns more bureaucrats and more regulations.  That is why government is the only real growth industry in the country where the highest salaries are paid.

The highest-ranked Canadian city is Ottawa because bureaucrats have higher incomes on average than private-sector workers.

Canada’s runner-up is Edmonton (54th), another government town full of well-paid civil servants.

All of these bureaucrats with imaginary jobs have very real impacts on the actual economy.  It is expensive and difficult to get anything done in Canada.  5 years ago I bought about 500 ft² of land from my neighbor.  The lots were large and the way they were situated it was land he could not use but I wanted it for a parking pad next to my garage.  It took 5 minutes for me to reach an agreement with my neighbor and then more than a year to get government approval.  If it takes more than a year to transfer 500 ft² of unusable land between 2 agreeable parties, how long do you think it takes to get the approvals to build a condo or apartment building?

So at the same time the federal government dramatically increased new arrivals municipal and provincial governments have been working diligently to make sure nothing can get built.  It does not take a genius to predict that this would be a problem.  But in Canada when we are faced with problems we don’t turn to geniuses.  We turn to “experts”, which is exactly what the Communist Bureau of Canada did to produce this article.  Below are some of their expert solutions.

Tranjan said one argument against rent control is that it slows down housing starts and makes it harder for landlords to afford repairs and maintenance. But empirically, he said, those arguments only held true in the 1950s and ’60s when rent control was more “blunt” — like a straight freeze. 

Pick something that has never worked and fundamentally can’t work and do it again.

While Tranjan argues governments need to rely less on incentivizing the private sector to build homes. He believes when profit is removed from the process of developing housing, affordability can grow. 

Right removing incentive always makes people work harder.

Spassov also pointed to the National Housing Strategy announced in 2017, that provides billions in low-interest loans to developers who build units below market rents.

So you lower initial capital costs (by transferring them elsewhere) but you also lower future revenue.  The net does not change or may even be negative.

Not one of these “solutions” addresses the government policies that caused the problem in the first place.  They all involve some sort of rent control which always results in less supply which will just make the problem worse.  Do you really think any of these “experts” have ever solved a problem in their life?  Do you think even one of them has done a single day of productive work?  After 3 years of watching the public health experts get everything wrong don’t you think it is time to start ignoring “experts”?