Israelis data recently confirmed what independent thinkers have known for a very long time.  No healthy person under 50 died from COVID.  This is hardly surprising because healthy people under 50 don’t tend to die for any reason.  But, that statement unfortunately only applied to a pre-vax world.  In a post vax world it seems that many young, otherwise healthy people, drop dead for “unknown” reasons.

Canadians up to age 44 saw 27 percent more deaths than expected in the last five months of 2022, a big jump compared to the 19 percent seen from the onset of the pandemic in March 2020 up until August 2022

 

I wish I could say that it is obvious to everyone that the Jabs are harmful.  I can’t say that however, because most people are not aware of vax injuries.  By now most people know someone who has been vax injured but government has done a superb job downplaying the link between the jabs and these once rare events.  The cover-up has been thorough and must be very costly.

Some high earning entertainers have had their careers destroyed.  Celine Dion has cancelled touring indefinitely over “health” issues and recently Jami Fox suffered a life altering and career ended stroke.

 

👀 Journalist A.J. Benza Says He Has First-Hand Knowledge of What Caused Jamie Foxx's Stroke

"I had somebody in the room who let me know that Jamie had a blood clot in his brain after he got the shot. He did not want the shot but with the movie he was on, he was pressured to get… pic.twitter.com/PkKSJSLuK9

— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) May 31, 2023

Neither Celine Dion nor Jamie Fox’s family has linked their situation with the Jabs they were forced to take to continue performing.  Fox’s family has even participated in the cover-up by issuing false statements about Fox playing pickle ball during recovery.  Why are they not upset about the personal and enormous financial loses they have suffered?  Dion and Fox had earning potentials measured in tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars.  Do you think they would stay quiet without being compensated for their losses?  How much is it costing to buy their silence?

This cover-up is becoming very expensive, so why do they persist?  It would be easy to thrown Pfizer under the bus.  Politicians could claim they were duped by Pfizer and throw Bourassa in prison.  They could then force Pfizer to pony up a few billion to sprinkle around the vax injured.  Why don’t they take the easy way out before this gets worse?

I can think of only one answer to that question.  They do not want out of this; they obviously intend to do it again.  The cover-up must continue until the next round of injections.  When the next vaccine mandate arrives, the silence they bought or coerced will be to blame.  Don’t be part of it.  Speak up.

I found this interesting graphic on twitter.  It is the results of a Canadian survey about attitudes toward the Ukraine war.  The answers were grouped in 2 categories; vaccinated and unvaccinated.  There is a stark contrast between the 2 groups.

According to the Toronto Star newspaper the poll shows that “vaccine refusers” sympathize with Russia.

The EKOS survey — conducted from March 9 to March 13 and using a random sample of 1,035 Canadians — concludes that a “plurality of vaccine refusers are much more sympathetic to Russia.

The Star is of course lying to support the government narrative.  The poll did not ask where anyone’s sympathies lie, it just asked how we should participate.  The Star assumes that anyone who does not want Canada to participate is a Putin sympathizer.  My interpretation is somewhat different than the Star’s.  Unvaccinated people are independent thinkers who do their own research and did not blindly accept the government narrative on COVID or the vaccines.  Those same independent thinkers also don’t accept the Government narrative on the Ukraine.

This will come to a surprise to the people at the Star but it is possible to sympathize with the Ukraine and still want to stay out of this mess.  The Ukraine war never should have happened.  In 2013 Ukraine had a peaceful relationship with Russia.  In fact Russia was the Ukraine’s largest trading partner.  This peaceful cooperation with Russia did not fit US policy positions so the CIA financed a coup and encouraged anti-Russian sentiment.  Now Ukraine is at war.

According to the media and popular opinion you are a Putin stooge if you do not support sending weapons to the Ukraine but what good are those weapons doing?  Will they help Ukraine win the war or will they just get more Ukrainians killed?  That is a legitimate question that it seems only the unvaccinated are asking.

The hive narrative is that the Ukraine is winning and as long as we keep sending weapons their victory is assured.  We hang on to that narrative even as we watch Russia conquer more and more territory.  Russia recently took the city of Bakhmut.  The media wants us to believe that even though Bakhmut fell it is more evidence that Russia is losing because it took them longer than it should have to take the city.  The numbers and facts tell a very different story.

Bakhmut was defended by 80,000 Ukrainians.  The Russians attacked with 50,000 soldiers.  There is no way that 80,000 soldiers in fortified positions should have been routed by only 50,000 attackers especially not poorly trained attackers which the Russians were.  According to the Wagner boss his mercenary army the Russian used to attack Bakhmut consisted mostly of prisoners.

Prigozhin said in a new interview with a prominent Russian blogger that of the tens of thousands of convicts his private military company recruited from Russian prisons to fight in Bakhmut, about 20 percent of them died in the battle.

The Ukraine was not prepared for the Russian invasion.  Their army even in the early days of the war was poorly trained.  Patriot volunteers were thrown in to battle with little support or training.

He was handed a rifle and a grenade launcher before he was even issued a uniform, such was the chaos of war’s early days, when Russian forces were bearing down on Kyiv.

Fluent in English, his initial training involved reading a US military field manual, later organizing medical and basic tactical exercises with his unit in their spare time

It would appear that the state of the Ukrainian army is even worse than that now.  Even though we are providing state of the art weaponry it does not matter.  Most of Ukraine’s experienced soldiers are now dead.  The ones that remain are not even capable of repelling an army of poorly trained convicts.

We could keep supplying weapons to the Ukraine but to what end?  Ukraine cannot win.  The longer this goes the more entrenched Russia will be and the more Territory Ukraine will have to abandon to secure peace. The west wanted to dismantle Russia but all they will accomplish is dismantling the Ukraine one conquered territory at a time.

What do we achieve by prolonging this war?  Do we really want to see more Ukrainians die?  How come it is only unvaccinated people who are not willing to sacrifice more Ukrainians in a proxy war that should have never happened and that Canada should never have been part of?

For those of you who don’t know it yet China is not our friend.  China is emerging as “The” global superpower and preparing to take back Taiwan.  You would think this would be of some concern to Western leaders but China is staying under the radar while western leaders lecture each other on Trans’ rights.

China has been preparing for global domination for a long time and part of the preparations is infiltrating western Countries.  Canada is of particular interest to China not because Canada is important but because the US is.  Canada shares the world’s longest undefended border with The US.  For years China has been placing assets in Canada and now Canada has a disproportionately high number of Chinese spies diplomats.

A comparative analysis of Chinese foreign representatives in Western democracies by CTV News reveals the disproportionate attention China places on Canada. According to some national security experts, the disproportionate numbers could indicate diplomatic influence has tipped over into interference.

I have no doubt that China would have continued to place spies in Canada with Justin Trudeau’s consent but Joe Biden made Canada unimportant by opening the southern border.  The US now has 2 long undefended borders and Chinese nationals are flooding across the Southern border with Mexico.

 

The Chinese nationals are all military age men.  They fit, affluent, and educated; in short they are not refugees.  Some of these men are spies.  Many more are undoubtedly Chinese Special Forces.  As tensions escalate in Europe with China’s ally Russia, US border officials are letting in thousands of military age Chinese men without a sideways glance.

This is insane and it is only a matter of time before something bad happens.  In fact it appears things are already well underway.  30 tons of fertilizer has been stolen from a train in the US.  Fertilizer can be used to make bombs.  Timothy McVeigh did this in Oklahoma with only 2 tons of fertilizer, parked outside the building.

How much damage do you think trained Special Operatives can do with 30 tones placed in a more optimal location?  Something bad is about to happen and the US government knows it.  My guess is they expect an attack on communication infrastructure.  That would certainly explain why they gave ½ of the senators satellite phones.

I find it curious that only 50% received Satellite phones.  The senate in the US is evenly split republican to Democrat.  What do you want to bet it was the Democrats who received phones?  You might draw different conclusions, but when I see a Democrat administration allow military age men from a hostile nation to enter illegally, and then hand out Sat phones to Democrats, I smell a rat.  Is the Biden administration cooperating or at least allowing the Chinese to attack America from within?

For years there was talk of accepting Ukraine in to NATO.  However, the idea was never seriously considered by NATO because Ukraine never met the criteria for NATO membership.  Specifically Ukraine was far too corrupt to be accepted in to NATO.

You cannot admit a corrupt country in to a military alliance.  Strategies and capabilities must remain secret not sold to the highest bidder.  There is not a single secret that Ukrainian officials would not sell and everyone knows that.  Ukraine’s corruption is not a secret.  Dozens of politically connected families like the Bidens did “business” in the Ukraine; attracted to the corruption like a fly to shit.

Talk of NATO membership was always just a stick to poke Putin with.  Putin was clear Russia would not tolerate a NATO country as large as Ukraine on their border.  Putin’s warnings were never taken seriously because no one took Ukraine’s NATO membership seriously.  Common knowledge was that Ukraine would never be given NATO membership.

Then Joe Biden got installed in the White House and all that changed.  2023 was the date set for Ukraine NATO membership.  This change in policy was not because Ukraine had suddenly reformed and was no longer corrupt.  Ukraine is still the most corrupt country in Europe and would be a dangerous and unreliable ally.  There was only one reason to set 2023 as a date for Ukrainian membership; to provoke a war with Russia no later than 2022.

We can speculate for hours about why political insiders wanted a war in the Ukraine without identifying every reason but one thing is certain; they wanted a war and they got one.  Whatever their objective was initially it seems the war is not turning out the way they had hoped.  The war was provoked by offering NATO membership and now it seems that offer is off the table.  German Chancellor Sholz is now publicly admitting that the Ukraine does not meet the requirements for NATO membership.

At the end of the meeting of G7 nations in Japan, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said on Sunday that Ukraine currently does not meet the requirements to join the NATO alliance.

Chancellor Sholtz is just admitting the obvious.  The Ukraine will never be part of NATO and there was never a reason for this war.  The narrative on the Ukraine is slowly changing.  It looks like some NATO members want out of this unnecessary war before it escalates.  Pulling their support means pulling their money and unless the US is willing to step up and do this without NATO the war will end quickly.

Zelensky knows this and is on a world tour to shore up support for the war.  But there could be a dual purpose to his world tour.  Travelling the globe is a convenient excuse not to be in the Ukraine when it finally falls to Russia.  The next few months will be very interesting.  NATO could fracture in to pieces and Ukraine fall to Russia.  Or NATO doubles down and we get dragged in to WW3.

Climate Science is not rooted in reality and neither are Climate policies.  Most countries have set a target of net zero by before 2050.  This is an impossible pipe dream and up until now no one has been brave enough to say it.

Exxon disagreed, and said the world is not on a path to achieve net-zero emissions in 2050 as limiting energy production to levels below consumption demand would lead to a spike in energy prices, as observed in Europe following oil sanctions against Russia over Ukraine.

The above message from Exxon will no doubt be dismissed because of the source but what Exxon just said is the absolute truth.  Barring some new technologically revolution, there is no way to be net zero by 2050.  We do not have the technology or the money to replace nearly 85% of the worlds energy supply.

Fossil fuels (gas, coal, and oil) make up 77% of the world’s energy.  Biomass which for all purposes is no different than fossil fuels is another 7%.  Solar and wind combined are only 6%.  There is no way windmills and solar panels will every make up the difference by 2050 especially when you consider solar is still currently uneconomic.  Many people are installing solar now because of the available government subsidies but even with the subsidies solar is uneconomic.

The Energy Pay-Back time for roof-top solar generation of electricity is 22 to 24 years for Melbourne, 14 to 15 years for Perth, and 14 years for Alice Springs.

A payout of 14 years is no payout.  Because of inflation, money saved 14 years from now is not worth the same as money spent today to install solar.  When you factor in time value of money solar is uneconomic even with the government subsidies.  It is a sure fire money loser without the subsidies.

Even some politicians are starting to admit that it probably can’t be done.  As part of Canada’s strategy all coal fired generation is supposed to be discontinued by 2035.  Coal currently accounts for 25% of the world’s energy and in the province of Saskatchewan it is 41%.  Saskatchewan is extremely hot in the summer and brutally cold in the winter.  Shutting down these Coal generation stations will actually cause starvation and deaths due to temperature extremes.  Incredibly Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe has decided he killed enough people with his COVID policies and he is not willing to kill any more with climate policies.

“I want to be very clear about this. In Saskatchewan, we will not attempt the impossible when it comes to power production in our province. We will not risk plunging our homes, our schools, our hospitals, our special care homes, our businesses into the cold and darkness because of the ideological whims of others. We will not increase power costs for our businesses and for our families to the point they become completely unaffordable. If we were to do that, we wouldn’t grow anything in Saskatchewan. We wouldn’t move anything. We wouldn’t go anywhere. And we’d get awful cold in a hurry. Saskatchewan must have affordable and reliable electricity available on demand.”

Climate science is political science.  CO2 simply cannot increase the earth’s temperature much more than it already has.  And even if CO2 could do the things the climate cult fears, we can’t do anything about it anyway.  Far more people would die from lack of energy than will ever die from hot weather.  So why do government’s insist on dragging us down this destructive path?  For the same reason those sociopaths do anything; money, power, and control.

Governments have convinced people that climate change is a problem and taxes are the solution.  These taxes are quite lucrative.  In Canada the Trudeau liberals increase the carbon tax each year and in some provinces the Carbon tax alone increases the cost of a liter of gas by $0.61 ($2.30/gallon).  This plus taxes on home heating syphons thousands per year out of each family’s resources.

When the analysis of the two reports is combined, a middle-income family in Ontario will be paying $1,771 per year more due to both charges by 2030. In Manitoba, that combined tax increase amounts to $1,130, while in Saskatchewan it works out to $1,213 annually and $1,859 in Alberta.

With carbon taxes Trudeau will eventually reduce every family’s net income to zero.  That is the real purpose of this climate charade; to transfer all of your money to the government.  It is wealth transfer plain and simple.  COVID was not about a virus and climate policy is not about the climate.  Are you starting to get the picture yet?

If you like being poor sit back and say nothing.  If not you better speak up now because no one is coming to help.  In Canada our completely corrupt courts have already ruled that they are firmly in the government’s corner.

The Supreme Court of Canada ruled Ottawa had the authority to do that because climate change was a serious threat and emissions did not respect provincial borders.

This is another reason government will never give up on this climate scam.  Since CO2 does not respect borders government doesn’t have to either.  There will always be a bureaucrat claiming they have jurisdiction over everything because CO2 is everywhere.  These sociopaths will continue to use plant food as a reason to take more money and more power for as long as we let them.  How about we start saying no?