The evidence is all there, time to start using it

/in /by

A friend sent me this very good interview with Dr. David Martin a few days ago and I finally got around to watching it yesterday.  I have seen many interviews with David Martin but I would have to rank this as the best I have seen.  In my mind he has never stated his case more clearly than he does in this video.  None of this happened by accident.  It was intentional, carefully planned, and the planning was happening for far longer than you think.

 

I have been critical of Dr. Martin in the past because all of his bold talk has resulted in no prosecutions.  Now I know why.  He gave his information to everyone and no one wanted to touch it for political reasons.  This is where I diverge somewhat from Dr. Martin.  I think the politics of COVID were more important to the outcome than he does.

I agree with Dr. Martin on every point and have said so multiple times on this blog over the last 3+ years.  The only place we diverge is that Dr. Martin believes the motivation behind this crime was 100% financial.  I believe there was also a political component.  Public coffers could not have been raided as completely as they were without first getting rid of a certain troublesome politician who would have prevented it.

Getting rid of Trump was fabulously good fortune for the Chinese.  Replacing Trump with Biden and Harris is impossibly good luck.  So impossible that it is hard to believe it happened by chance.

The entire COVID response up to and including the vaccines was a well-planned crime that was implemented the minute politicians announced lockdowns and the suspension of civil liberties.  Like most crimes it could not be concealed forever.  4 years too late COVID has hit the courts and some courts have even chosen to do the right thing and follow the law.  The lockdown in Alberta and Trudeau’s invocation of the emergencies act have both been ruled to be illegal.  These and other similar court rulings are starting to spawn lawsuits.

These lawsuits have caught the attention of the law makers, the politicians who participated in this crime.  All of them are starting to realize the COVID narrative is unraveling and their role will be exposed.  If this continues people will find out how much money politicians made while murdering their own citizens.  That is why we are seeing pushback like this.  France is trying to make it illegal to say anything negative about mRNA injections.

You can’t win a lawsuit when you are not allowed to discuss the murder weapon.  Laws like this are basically an admission of guilt.  The politicians knew what they were doing was wrong.  They profited from their illegal activities and millions of people died.  This was mass murder and it cannot go unpunished.

Indoctrination works until the pain sets in

/1 Comment/in /by

Bill gates is planning to cut down trees to save the planet from global warming/climate change/climate catastrophe/global boiling, or whatever the left is calling it today.  This idea is of course bat shit crazy.  It will do nothing other than harm the local environment near the decimated forests.

I saw another article this morning about this ridiculous plan and the first thing I thought was;

  1. Have we been so dumbed down by climate “science” that we will believe this nonsense?

The second thing that came to mind was;

  1. Yes we probably have been dumbed down sufficiently to believe this.

So how did we get here?  How as a society have we become stupid enough to believe cutting down entire forests will save the planet?  Why did we think the planet needed saving in the first place?  The answer to those questions is of course our public indoctrination centers schools.

I am not young so my public education ended several decades ago.  Even that far back the public schools were busy implanting very bad ideas.  I remember learning about economic systems.  My textbook had a very long list of drawbacks to capitalism with a very short list of the advantages.  In contrast the list of drawbacks to communism was short and the list of advantages was long.  The objective of the lesson was covert yet still obvious; capitalism bad, communism good.  I wish I could say things have improved but they have not.

My daughter teaches school.  She does not teach the subjective subjects that allow for the nonsense but her subjects are still part of the indoctrination protocol.  What I have learned from her lesson plans is that schools have improved their indoctrination techniques by employing a firehose.  Schools now try to jam so much information into students that they do not have time to think about any of it.  They are conditioning students to accept information given to them by authority figures without question.

As a society we would be far better off giving students half as much information and allow the time to critically analyze everything.  This would produce far better thinkers and would not allow cracks for nonsense to get in.  But what is good for society is rarely good for governments and politicians.  Producing critical thinkers is not the true purpose of public “education”.

This system works against us when all the pieces work as they have been designed.  Public education is working perfectly as designed.  We now have generations of people primed to believe nonsense like changing the weather by cutting down trees.  The problem with these carefully planned systems, however, is that reality always intrudes.  No matter how much you want to save the planet it is only a matter of time before you discover your enforced altruism is making you poor.

“This transition is not going to make us collectively richer,” Pierre Wunsch told the European Parliament in Brussels. “We should be more candid… don’t lure people into thinking that greening carries positive opportunities that could augment GDP and create millions of well-paid jobs.”

Eventually even pre-programmed people will discover the lie if the lie is destructive enough.  Sooner or later people will discover that climate change is an even larger lie than COVID.  The longer that takes though, the more damage we will suffer.

The deification of Dr. Mengele

/2 Comments/in /by

Dr.  Bonnie Henry is the Public Health officer for the province of British Columbia.  She is also a psychopath.  Dr. Henry was one of the worst COVID tyrants in a country with a lot of people vying for that title.  BC is one of the few places in Canada that still has vaccine mandates even though Dr. Henry is very aware of vaccine injuries.  Leaked emails show she was completely unconcerned with serious injuries that were reported immediately after the Jab programs started.

In no sane country would Dr. Henry be allowed to practice medicine or have a position of authority that allowed her to hire other COVID criminals like Deena Hinshaw.  But, Trudeau’s Canada is not a sane country.  Not only is Dr. Henry continuing to abusing British Columbians, some people in the media are trying to elevate her to sainthood.  A new documentary about her has been released with a laughable misleading title.

“Our Time to be Kind.”

I gagged upon hearing the news. 

There was nothing kind about what Dr. Henry did during COVID or what she continues to do now.  At the same time that Dr. Henry was locking people down, she was implementing BC’s new safe supply regulations.  She locked people in their homes and then supplied them with drugs.  I will give you 3 guesses what happened.  If you did not guess thousands of over dose deaths you are wrong.

Another 198 British Columbians died from toxic drugs in July, according to data released Tuesday by the B.C. Coroners Service, bringing the death toll in the first seven months of the year to 1,455.

The safe supply regulations according to Dr. Henry were going to save lives.  That did not happen.  Remarkably giving addicts free drugs did nothing to help them with their addictions.  Since the introduction of this program overdose deaths have steadily increased which according to Dr. Henry is a really good reason to expand the program to include other deadly drugs.

A new report from Dr. Bonnie Henry has called on the B.C. government to broaden the availability and types of drugs that can be prescribed under the province’s controversial safer-supply program.

Dr. Henry is responsible for thousands of deaths.  She has the same basic medical philosophy as Dr. Mengele.  In what bizarre universe is that worthy of praise?

The Politics of Massacres

/in /by

Japan is a very interesting case.  Due to their diet the Japanese have a very high average vitamin D levels.  Vitamin D was identified as a dominant factor during COVID.  Prior to the jabs almost no one with a proper vitamin D level suffered from severe COVID.  That was certainly the case in Japan where they sailed through the first season of COVID with fewer excess deaths than normal.

Excess deaths In Japan started to trend up in February of 2021 which also coincided with Japan experiencing basically their first COVID deaths.

As you can see from the plot above COVID is over in Japan but the pandemic of excess deaths is not.  So what changed in February of 2021 that brought both COVID and other mysterious deaths to Japan?  I think everyone knows the answer to that.  Japan started using the COVID jabs in February of 2021.

Japan had absolutely no reason to use the Jabs but they did and the results have been horrific.  Or as this professor puts it, there has been a massacre.

 

Similar massacres have occurred in every country that mandated the jabs yet somehow jab mandates have not become a political issue anywhere.  A handful of politicians have spoken out forcefully but have failed to make it an issue.  People who might die 200 years from now due to climate change still dominate political discussions while people dying now get ignored.

The US is in an election year and the Jab mandates have not been discussed by anyone other than RFK.  The republican and democrat candidates have said nothing.  That is hardly surprising since both men are up to their eyeballs in the jabs and mandates.   Trump’s operation warp speed paved the way for the mandates that Biden enforced.  Both men have no desire to discuss the jabs but that which cannot continue won’t continue.  I doubt as Edward Dowd points out that they can continue to ignore the massacre.  It has affected far too many people to stay out of the election.

 

I Hope the Jabs finally become a political issue.  Trump has an out because he never forced anyone to take them although he has enthusiastically endorsed the jabs.  Biden’s out will be the same one he used in his stolen document case.  He is a doddering, senile, old fool who can’t even remember signing off on the mandates.

 

I would hate to be on either campaign team trying to spin this before November.   How do you defend a massacre?

We don’t even need to turn the lights out; renewable energy will do that for us

/in /by

I have written many times about Canada’s decline.  It may seem repetitive but Canadians need to wake up.  Canada is headed for a very bad place and has been for a very long time.  We have had a succession of poor prime ministers more concerned about personal or party advancement than Canadian advancement.  Even Stephen Harper signed agreements that were not in Canada’s best interests.

The erasure of the Canadian dream is not a distant observation; it’s a reality I’ve seen unfold across generations, from my parents to my children.

No one person is responsible for the mess that we now find ourselves in but one man has done far more damage than everyone else.  That man is Justin Trudeau.  How this simpleton became the leader of a G8 country without obvious signs of election fraud is a mystery.  But he did become leader and now all Canadians are paying a heavy price for our own collective stupidity.  Canada’s economy is in a shambles.  Our GDP per capita is falling and money is fleeing the country.

In fact, Canada has been a net exporter of capital in this way since the mid-1990s. 

That balance has been growing more negative over the years. Even during the Harper years of 2010-15, though our resource sector was strong, our FDI balance was negative US$7.4 billion, meaning we were a net capital exporter. But during the Trudeau years of 2016-2022, FDI inflows fell 15 per cent while outflows rose 16 per cent. The negative FDI balance was -US$23.9 billion per year, three times higher than in Harper’s final five years.

Canada has been a bad place to invest for a long time and it got much worse under Trudeau.  It is small wonder investors don’t want to invest in a country that is trying to make telling the truth about energy a punishable crime.

Those who speak in favor of fossil fuels, or criticize plans to eliminate them, will face massive fines and possible prison time.

The economic damage done to Canada is bad but in any other country it could be reversible.  I fear that is not the case in Canada because Trudeau was not just content with destroying our economy.  He has actively been destroying the very fabric of the nation.  He has been dismantling Canada brick by brick with one senseless law after another.

If we are clear-eyed and look about us without preconceptions, we see a country embracing its own demise, one bill, enactment, levy, and piece of legislation after another.

In a similar vein, Niagara Independent journalist Chris George in his provocative pdf book “The Troubled State of the Nation,” asserts: “On Trudeau’s watch, Canada has been systematically deconstructed. Whether it is Canada’s fiscal and economic conditions, international position, justice system, or the authority of Parliament, on multiple fronts the Liberals continue to advance their post-national vision as if they were picking and unravelling the threads of a twined rope

This is hardly surprising given that Trudeau does not believe in Canada and does not even like Canadians.  He made his disdain for both clear on the election trail.  Trudeau expressed his dislike of “old stock European Canadians” a demographic that makes up more than 60% of the country.  Anyone who dislikes most of the people in a country obviously does not like that country and Trudeau as much as said so.  He called Canada a post national state.  He never explained what that was but it obviously means he does not consider Canada to be a nation state, just the ward of some global authority.

Trudeau told everyone he does not like Canada or Canadians and people voted for him anyway.  Canadians either don’t pay attention or are incredibly stupid.  We stood by and allowed him to turn a proud important country into nothing but a memory.

the term “Canada,” thanks to Justin Trudeau’s shabby and reprobate government, has become nothing more than a placeholder, a kadigan pastiche of what was once a real country, or as Chris George says, “a country with a glorious history.” And as he might have added, a post-national entity with a miserable future.

I can’t say it any better than that.  Canadians sat idly and watched as one man erased our country and our children’s future.  Every person who voted for that idiot Trudeau ought to hang their head in shame.

The only thing more widespread than the damage is the denial

/in /by

Heart attacks and strokes are way up the media and government continue ignore the problem.  Heart attacks in young people with no history of heart problems are attributed to skipping imaginary doctor’s appointments or not taking medications that have never been prescribed.  The whole thing is insane and tragically what we have seen to date is likely just the tip of the iceberg.

 

Governments and media continue to deny the link between the jabs and heart damage despite the fact we now have solid scientific evidence that it is happening and it is wide spread.  The same can be said of circulatory problems.  Way back in 2021 Dr. Hoffe proved definitively that 62% of his patients experienced blood clots after the jabs.

He performed D dimer tests before and after on his vaccinated patients.  You know actual science.  He found the jabs caused blood clots in 62% of his patients.

The government says the jabs are safe.  Science says they are not. Talk about an inconvenient truth.  The government also says the Jabs are effective.  But again the data inconveniently says they are not.

19,700 deaths from “COVID-19” in 2022, up from 15,900 in 2020.

And this after 7 COVID-19 Vaccines recommended by NACI.

This is proof that COVID-19 Vaccines did not save a single life.

There is no evidence the jabs saved anyone and mountains of evidence that they continue to cause harm.  Why are we still using them?  Are we insane?  The people behind this know the data.  They know the jabs have done nothing but increase the number of people who have died.  It is way past time to start prosecuting them.

Florida Acknowledging the obvious

/in /by

There is a COVID inquiry going on in Florida.  They have released some preliminary findings.  So far they have not said much about the Jabs, which is surprising because the Florida surgeon general does not recommend them.  But, they did have a lot to say about lockdowns and other highly unscientific mitigation measures.  (My comments from previous posts are interspersed).

Among the body’s conclusions:

  • Jurisdictions that enforced lockdowns “tended to end up with higher overall excess mortality.”

Lockdowns and restrictions that keep people apart are a self-fulfilling prophesy.  If you keep it up for long enough people will die.  Then the government can say “I told you so” and use those deaths as an excuse to continue with the lockdowns.

  • “There have always been legitimate questions around the impracticality of individual adherence to mask recommendations, but once it became clear that the primary transmission vector of SARS-CoV-2 was via aerosol, their potential efficacy was further diminished.”

Nowhere that has mandated masks have seen any difference in the arc of their infections.  The math, science and historical data show that masks do not work against airborne viruses yet here we are wearing them to avoid being fined or imprisoned.  Does anyone still think this is about a virus?

  • Social distancing is not “nearly as important … as it is whether they are in an interior or exterior environment and whether that environment is subject to adequate airflow,” information that they said is still “missing from the CDC’s Social Distancing Guidelines.”

Had we made the logical conclusion that the virus is airborne we would have realized the only impactful measure would have been better building ventilation. 

  • Mask mandates, social distancing guidelines and shutdowns were “not administered based on the best available scientific data.”

The idea of locking down and hiding from a virus came from a high school science project.  I guess they saw the word “science” in “high school science” and automatically assumed the policy was written on the third missing tablet that God gave to Moses.

There is no science that determined what the safe distance to stand from another person is; especially a person that is not infected.

  • “In fact, many public health recommendations and their attendant mandates departed significantly from scientific research” that was available to everyone at the time.

The science said masks would not work and they did not.  Go figure.  Apparently science does not change just because people prefer stupidity.

The report said the grand jury talked with doctors, scientists, and professors “with a broad range of viewpoints.”

 

I don’t know why it took so long to acknowledge that every single COVID mitigation measure was not just stupid but harmful.  Governments whether through malice or abject stupidity increased rather than decreased the number of people who died.  We are governed by serial killers.  Do we want to let that continue?

At what point do we declare Canada a Banana Republic?

/in /by

The big COVID news out of Canada yesterday is 2 of the Coutts 4 were released from prison after pleading guilty to lesser charges.  The Coutts 4 had participated in the protest at the Alberta Coutts Border crossing that coincided with the Freedom convoy protest in Ottawa.  While the 2 protests were united by a similar cause, freedom, they were independent protests.

On February 14th 2022 the RCMP raided a trailer at the protest and arrested Anthony Olienick, Chris Carbert, Christopher Lysak, and Jerry Morin on charges of conspiracy to commit murder.  The RCMP alleged that the 4 men were planning to kill RCMP officers.  Justin Trudeau used the arrest as justification to invoke the emergencies act and crush the Freedom convoy protesters in Ottawa; a similar but unrelated protest happening 2000 miles away from where the arrests were made.

So this effectively ended the freedom movement.  One arrest wrapped the whole thing up nicely for Justin Trudeau.  There is only one problem with this convenient, tidy, narrative.  It is all a lie.

The serious charge of conspiring to kill police officers was used to keep all 4 in prison for 2 years without trial.  Now the conspiracy charges have evaporated and 2 have been released in return for pleading to lesser charges.  Lysiak plead guilty of unauthorized possession of a hand gun.  This sounds bad but it was just improperly stored.  Morin plead guilty to conspiracy to traffic firearms even though there is no evidence he illegally sold a single firearm and was not charged with this at the time of his arrest.  All of a sudden we find out that no actual police officers were ever at risk.

All of this is bad but this is not just a tale of overactive and incompetent policing.  This was a conspiracy involving the National Police force, the Federal judicial system, the media, and the Prime Minister.  The police arrested 4 men on false charges and the injustice system held them on those fake charges for 2 years until the men were desperate enough to plead to lesser fake charges.  All the while the public were convinced of their guilt because the media repeatedly published this photo that many pointed out could not be real.

And, the crowning achievement of this conspiracy was that the Justin Trudeau used the false arrest of these 4 men as an excuse to persecute a much larger group in Ottawa.

It is a small comfort that two of Canada’s political prisoners are now free. But no Canadian is free when their civil liberties can be trampled at will by their Prime Minister.

Releasing these 4 men has not restored Justice in Canada.  This was a crime committed by the state and no one involved is facing any repercussions.  This cannot end here.

 

Canadians need to wake up to just how serious this is.  This is truly banana republic stuff.  Canada has fallen so far that I am surprised Justin Trudeau does not make public appearances in a fake uniform with fake medals on his chest.

Killing not just trust

/1 Comment/in /by

The following video was posted online by a doctor alarmed at what he is seeing.

 

Do you think he is the only doctor seeing these problems?  Of course not; I am certain every doctor has noticed a significant increase in unusual ailments among their patients.  So why are more doctors not speaking out?

I can only speculate as to the reasons but right away 2 come to my mind.  Many doctors were eager to take the payments for vaccinating their patients and now don’t want to admit they put the money ahead of their patients.  Or, big pharma has so firmly captured the medical establishment that doctors do not want to upset the gravy train.  This is not about money they have already been paid.  It is about future income that they are unwilling to put at risk.

The first reason is bad but understandable.  Covering up mistakes is wrong but also a predictable, normal, human behavior.  The second is obscene.  The mistakes are being covered so that they can and will be made again.  There may be other reasons that a less cynical person might propose but the only people who really know are the doctors themselves.  They are the only ones who can say why they are choosing to be accomplices to murder.

https://rumble.com/v4bjppw-author-john-beaudoin-burying-covid-vaxx-deaths-is-felony-murder.html

The poor girl in that example died 26 days after her COVID vax but that was not the only vaccine administered.  Are some of those products unsafe or is it all of them?  Is it the combination that is unsafe?  These are the kinds of questions that need to be asked but they are also the kinds of questions that could limit pharmaceutical profits so no one seems willing to ask them.

Clearly the COVID jabs are a problem.  Excess deaths increased right after the roll out.  But that does not mean the others are not also a problem.  Remember excess deaths are deaths over and above a base line.  The base line already includes deaths from other vaccines that have been misattributed to other causes.

We need to start having a frank conversation about all of these products.  Which are necessary and which are not.  Are there any that are too dangerous to use and how should they be used?  Is it OK to give multiple vaccines at once?  The only way to restore faith in modern medicine is to stop dismissing anti-vaxxers and start having long overdue debates.  In short we need to stop killing people for profit.

 

A fascinating interview with an old school scientist

/in /by

A friend sent me this Denis Rancourt interview.  It is very long but very good.  If you have the time I highly recommend that you watch it.

 

If you don’t have the time I will briefly discuss what for me were some of the interview highlights.  I must confess that many of the things that resonated with me are thing or similar themes that you can find on this blog.

Stress kills

One theme that pervades the interview which Steve Kirsch manages to not pick up for the whole 2 hour interview is the detrimental effects of stress.  Stress and isolation kills.  You don’t need a virus to kill people you just need the fear generated by the thought of a deadly pathogen and some government enforced isolation.  This is a topic I have returned to multiple times.  The government knew damn well the lockdowns would kill.

Scientists have known for 1000 years that stress negatively impacts health.  Stress on its own can kill.  A few decades ago an American scientist was able to show that the stress of unemployment was so deadly that excess mortality correlates to excess unemployment.  Unemployment kills and our governments shut down businesses and threw people in to unemployment.

And, it was not long before the numbers showed that the lockdowns were killing people.

There is no scientific basis for a lockdown to prevent viral spread.  There was a lot of science indicating lockdowns would come with a horrible cost.  The data is showing that now. 

 

Steve Kirsch constantly wanted to discuss anecdotal evidence of strange health outcomes.  Kirsch wanted to blame everything on either the virus or the vaccine.  Rancourt failed to explain to him that the overwhelming stress from unprecedented government intervention will produce strange health results.  Some of what we saw was undoubtable no more than what Rancourt described as the governments assault on the populous.  Viruses and vaccine may be a convenient way for the government to kill but they are not the only way.

Nothing was spreading

Rancourt states he sees no evidence that a deadly pathogen was spreading quickly.  All that was spreading quickly was tyranny.  Excess deaths correlate to government malfeasance not a viral outbreak.  Again this is a theme explored many time on this blog.  The virus didn’t kill but the government did and the only reason we found the virus everywhere we find deaths is that the virus was released months ahead of time to create the illusion that it was spreading quickly.

The second release was followed quickly by manufactured videos of people dropping dead in the street.  Suddenly the virus was discovered everywhere.  We were told this was due to how incredibly contagious this virus was when really it was just because the virus had a 5 month head start.  The fear factor was ramped up, society was shut down, and then the deaths started to happen.

There was no deadly pathogen just deadly government

Rancourt took things one step further than I did.  I maintained that the virus was not spreading as quickly as they wanted us to believe.  Rancourt is not convinced there was a virus.  While I have never discussed this I did touch on a similar them lately.  If we had identified the correct virus then why didn’t the jabs help even a little?

This was always a bit of a mystery to me because while I think it was an enormously bad idea to risk long term complications for partial protection, the jabs still should have helped with COVID.  Then after watching this video a light went on.  Maybe the jabs did not work because they were designed for the wrong virus?

After listening to Rancourt I must admit his explanation that there may not even have been a virus is just as plausible as my explanation.

Some conspiracy theories are just that, conspiracy theories

Rancourt took a question about 5 G and gave an opinion that 5G was likely not a factor in the plandemic.  I have never written about 5G on this blog for just that reason.  On the urging of a reader I tried to correlate 5G to increased deaths and I could not.  I also don’t think 5G is a contributing factor.  The tin foil hat crowd has had a remarkable track record during COVID but not everything they believe can be substantiated by the data.

Finally the most important part

I know this whole blog post must come across as my attempt to make it all about me and I confess I am proud of my track record for the last 4 years.  With a little research and logic I have been right far more times than I have been wrong.  But, there is one big difference between Denis Rancourt and me.  Rancourt is a serious, rigorous scientist and I am just an engineer pissed off about the direction of the world.  I am willing to give an opinion after an hour or two of analysis often taking data at face value.  That is something Rancourt simply will not do.

If you take the time to watch the interview you will see that Rancourt is very careful with what he says.  This is how a real scientist speaks.  He will give an opinion but he is clear when his opinions are based on only a basic knowledge and interpretation of data he has not spent the time to verify.  Rancourt is much more definitive about things he has spent the time to analyze at great depth.

To me this was the most impactful part of the interview; just the overall tone.  Rancourt is very careful with what he does and does not endorse.  He comes across as a very thoughtful and diligent scientist interested in the truth and not the source of his next grant.  He is an old school scientist from a time when it was a calling not an occupation.  As a real scientist Rancourt is not prone to hyperbolic statements.  He does not say things he can’t back up.

Rancourt is a very careful measured scientist who only comments forcefully on things he can back up and he is the co-author of a paper concluding 17 million people have already died from the jabs.  Do you still think the jabs are safe?