There are congressional hearings going on in the US right now about the effectiveness of vaccine mandates.  Various experts testified that as a general rule vaccine mandates should be avoided because they violate basic human rights and destroy public trust.

The researchers concluded “that mandatory COVID-19 vaccine policies have had damaging effects on public trust, vaccine confidence, political polarization, human rights, inequities and social wellbeing. We question the effectiveness and consequences of coercive vaccination policy in pandemic response and urge the public health community and policymakers to return to non-discriminatory, trust-based public health approaches.”

One expert, Dr. Kevin Bardosh, testified that mandates for college students caused more harm than good.  He cited his own paper published in March of this year as evidence.

Booster mandates in young adults are expected to cause a net harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented, we anticipate at least 18.5 serious adverse events from mRNA vaccines, including 1.5–4.6 booster-associated myopericarditis cases in males (typically requiring hospitalisation). 

I find it encouraging that, in the US at least, there is finally objective analysis of the futility of COVID vaccine mandates.  It is, however, disappoint that it took this long to get here.  There was never any justification for COVID vaccine mandates in the first place.

The only possible justification for a vaccine mandate is if the vaccine prevents infection and transmission.  Although we were told for more than a year that The COVID vaccines would do this everyone who said that knew they were lying.  To start the COVID jabs are not vaccines and the way they work they cannot produce immunity.  That is why, more than 2 years ago I wrote this.

1. These treatments only serve to give your immune system a Boost. They help improve your odds of survival.  They really do not do anything more than Vitamin D and Ivermectin.  But there is one crucial difference.  There are no known side effects for Vitamin D and Ivermectin.

2. The benefit from the treatment is temporary. Antibodies fade quickly without the T cells you have no lasting immunity.  That is what the yearly booster shots are for.  The booster shots are not for new variants as you have been led to believe.

3. We cannot reach herd immunity through Vaccination. To reach herd immunity everyone must still be exposed to the virus and get infected.

We also did not need to wait for Dr. Bardosh’s paper to know that college vaccine mandates were immoral, even criminal.  Healthy young People have zero risk from COVID.  College vaccine mandates force students to take a medication that they do not need that has no public health benefit.  This would have been illogical if the vaccines had no side effects but the vaccines have potentially deadly side effects.  By June of 2021 there was enough evidence from Israel to know that these treatments would kill some of the students who were forced to take them.

Now data is coming out of Israel showing higher than normal deaths among young men.  The deaths start to occur after the second dose. 

Vaccine mandates caused thousands of deaths and millions of injuries without providing any public health benefit.  We have the benefit of hindsight now but we did not need it to make the right decision in 2021.  The authorities knew enough not to do this yet they did it anyway.  At a minimum this is assault causing bodily harm but I believe the proper charge is still conspiracy to commit murder.

Canadian’s are taught that our judicial system is designed to protect the public.  Like much of what is taught in Canadian Public schools this is a lie.  The judicial system in Canada serves only one purpose.  It protects the government.  That is exactly why we are still prosecuting people for violating COVID rules even though the evidence is overwhelming that none of these rules worked.

One high profile COVID rule breaker is Randy Hillier a former member of the Ontario Provincial Parliament.  Hillier was charged multiple times for violating various inane COVID restrictions and his case is finally in court.  Hillier’s defense is very simple; an emergency should not negate all rights.

“Emergencies don’t just become Charter-free territory,” Henna Parmar, one of Hillier’s lawyers, told Ontario Superior Court Judge John Callaghan.

The Ontario government rebuts that statement by pointing out that the charter of rights allows them to violate rights.

Ontario concedes that Hillier’s freedom of assembly was violated, but claims it was done in a manner that can be justified under the Charter.

Don’t’ hold your breath waiting for a Canadian news agency to point out the obvious.  If rights can be denied in a manner that can be justified by the charter of rights then you do not have a charter of rights.

With that statement the Ontario government proved Hillier’s case.  They did violate his rights but according to the government they had to because the hospitals were full.

While these laws were in effect from April 7 to June 7, 2021, hospitalizations were at their highest ever, and the health-care system was nearing capacity and “compromising care for all patients,” according to the province’s Science Table. Case numbers were running away all across the province, and less than three per cent of people were vaccinated, Cookson said.

In Canada most provincial governments like Ontario exercise a complete monopoly on health care.  They are 100% in control of hospital capacity.  So this is a completely circular argument.  If the government can deny rights based on hospital capacity then they can suspend rights indefinitely by closing hospitals.  Any judge that would accept this argument is a lunatic that has no business in a court room.  But this is Canada, a country where most judges are appointed based on political ideology not jurisprudence; so I don’t like Hillier’s chances.

One of Hillier’s many COVID offences was attending a protest.  Not just any protest mind you; just the wrong kind of protest.  Hillier would have been free to attend any of the BLM protests which were allowed during the ban on outdoor gatherings.  He was just not allowed to attend a COVID policy protest.  The Ontario Government does not plan to supply evidence of what makes BLM protests safe and COVID protests dangerous.  They do, however, plan to enter fairy tales in to evidence.

Hassan argued Ontario did not have evidence that small outdoor gatherings were a particular risk, and relied too heavily on the superspreader case of a large motorcycle rally in North Dakota that also had indoor activities.

The rally that they are referring to is the Sturgis motor cycle rally which occurred in South not North Dakota (details do tend to be highly irrelevant to Canadian media).  South Dakota had no COVID restrictions only voluntary guidelines which the rally organizers chose to ignore.  The rally was immediately branded as a super spreader event by mainstream media.  When the media act in unison they are lying, and the Sturgis reporting was not an exception to that rule.  The media ridiculously over reported the impact of the rally based on computer modelling.

The real numbers are now available.  The models were only high by 57,451%.  You read that correctly.  The standard of accuracy for academic and media publication is now +/- 60,000%.

This is completely in line with their hysterical reporting on the effectiveness of all COVID restrictions which South Dakota proves had absolutely no effect.

Isn’t it amazing how justice works in Canada?  The government gets media to support their case by printing lies.  Then the media articles are entered in to evidence to support the government position.  Imaginary, often contradictory, evidence is all it takes to subjugate an entire country with the full support of the justice system.  Canada is broken beyond repair.

Canadian Officials have admitted that COVID vaccine injuries are under-reported.  Then in almost the same breath they state that the COVID jabs are safe.  How could they possibly know that?  They just admitted they do not really know how many people have been injured by the jab therefor they do not know anything about the safety of these treatments.  Canadian governments are still forcing certain groups to take a treatment with an unknown safety profile.

It has been 2.5 years how can the safety profile of these treatments still be unknown?  Willful ignorance, that’s how.  It is not difficult to get a better estimate of vaccine events.  You just need to comb emergency room visits that correlate to vaccine events.  The Epoch time did that and this is what they found.

The Epoch Times analyzed data collected by CANVAS that was released in an article published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases in March. It shows that for 1,173,748 COVID-19 vaccine doses administered and surveyed, there were 3,276 reported “serious health events” requiring an emergency department visit or hospitalization.

This represents one serious health event for every 358 doses, or 0.28 percent of all doses surveyed for the study.

0.28 % does not sound bad but it is 25 times higher than the official Canadian government number of 0.011%.

The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) says as of May 26, 2023, it has received reports of 55,145 adverse events following immunization out of 98,194,601 COVID-19 vaccine doses administered (0.056 percent of all doses administered).

Out of those, 10,906 were deemed serious (0.011 percent of all doses administered). One report counts for one person, who could have reported multiple adverse events. Adverse event reports can be filed by doctors, nurses, or pharmacists.

Keep in mind that this number is also a gross underestimation.  It is based on emergency room visits only and many vaccine injuries never see the emergency room.  People who die suddenly or visit their GP after feeling poorly are not accounted for in this analysis.

This is a constant theme with COVID isn’t it?  Government tells a lie that is easily proven with their own statistics.  The problem is no one in government or legacy media bothers to look.  That task is left up to independent media and private bloggers who have been shouting from rooftops for months without notice.  But all that is changing; the public is starting to notice.

All this is happening after mass vaccinations with a novel biotechnology drug. How long are we going to go on without acknowledging the elephant in the room or more especially tabulating how many among those dying are vaccinated or unvaccinated?

The Irony is that the jabs have been killing people for 2.5 years but the public is only noticing now as the excess deaths are starting to return to normal.  The plot below is from Euromomo that shows excess deaths lower than the previous 2 years and flattening out in the summer as it should.

So why didn’t the public notice the problems before when more people were actually dying?  The answer to that is not how many are dying but who is dying.  The high excess deaths in 2021 and 2022 were driven by excess deaths among seniors.  No one notices when a senior dies because most people who die normally are seniors.  Excess deaths among seniors are finally returning to normal but sadly that is not the case for young people.  Excess deaths for young people are higher now than they have been since the start of vaccinations.

The problem is hard to ignore because many of the deaths and injuries of younger people have been on camera or involved high profile public figures.  The latest victim happens to be the son of Lebron James.  It is sad that so many people had to be injured before the public could acknowledge that the government lied.  The question now is what do we do about it?  What do you do about a government saturated with liars who are not just indifferent to death and suffering but actually cause it?

Climate change policies are not about saving the planet.  They are about destroying your children’s future.  People who understand science know this but the public has been convinced that the planet must be saved in order to save their children’s future.  A great deal of effort was expended by media and politicians to convince you of this lie.  You were told that the green transition would save the planet and provide good jobs.  All we needed were a few windmills and solar panels to replace 85% of the worlds energy supply.  Really it is so simple it makes you wonder why we did not do it before.

Of course we did not do it before because it is incredibly stupid and our parents and grandparents were not stupid.  It took a great deal of effort to dumb our society down to the point where we would believe hottest ever declarations from fraudulent data.

https://slaynews.com/news/96-us-climate-data-corrupted-study-shows/

However, Dr. Watts’ research has revealed that more than 90% of NOAA thermometers are in inappropriate places.

96% are in parking lots, on buildings, against brick walls, or in other artificial environments.

The bricks, asphalt, and other human construction materials used in these environments artificially trap heat, leading to a “warming bias” in the collected data.

Propagandists disguised as scientists feed data that they know is wrong in to simulators that are programmed to say that heat kills.  A great deal of time and money has been spent to ignoring that the simulators have absolutely no connection with reality.  The world is not “overheating”.

Thermometers placed in natural settings register lower average temperatures.

And, cold temperatures kill 10 times as many people as hot temperatures.

Björn Lomborg‘s version shows us exactly how important heat deaths are. It’s no small thing. The news outlets are filled with heatwave porn trying to scare people about normal weather, while politicians try to justify spending billions to “cool” the world. These graphs hide the crime — increasing the cost of energy will kill far more than mythical cooling could ever save.

This is symbolic of the state of Science today: distorted by government funding until the point of it disappears.

 

People believe this nonsense because government pays unethical scientists to lie and public education is no longer about education.  It is about accepting facts the government presents as unassailable truth.  Public schools have been the primary tool in the dumbing down of our society.  They have been so successful in their mandate that the tyrants no longer feel the need to lie about what they are doing.  They now are open about the fact that green energy cannot replace hydrocarbons and we just need to suck it up and understand we must accept less.

The Los Angeles Times published an op/ed Friday in which it perhaps unintentionally poses the central proposition of the mythical energy transition: “whether our expectations should evolve in the name of preventing climate catastrophe.”

I have a radical idea for the seriously dumbed down masses to consider.  Instead of accepting a green energy transition that cannot possibly supply the energy we need; why don’t we just do a government transition?  Why don’t we run off the morons currently in charge, tear the whole system down, and start over?  Your children would thank you for it.

Canada’s economy is in a downwards spiral.  Things are so bad even the compliant Canadian media can no long ignore the problem

 “The persistent slump in both business investment and exports is symptomatic of structural shortcomings in Canada’s economy. These include low rates of business formation, regulatory uncertainty, barriers to investment (especially in the resources sector), restrictions on internal trade, faltering confidence of foreign investors in Canada, and low levels of productivity and innovation.

Regulatory uncertainty, investment restrictions, and trade restrictions are all caused by government.  Lorrie Goldstein might be too cowardly to say it but I am not; the problem with the Canadian economy is that Canada has too much government.  Not to worry though because our finance minister has a plan that involves even more government.

Freeland assured Canadians the government would address the issue by “investing in people … the green transition and … innovation and productivity.”

This by the way is our finance minister explaining that her number one priority for the Canadian economy is sending money to a corrupt country that Canada does virtually no trade with.

 

This is your finance minister -enough said !!
pic.twitter.com/e30cLd656e

— Concerned Canadian (@Concern70732755) July 17, 2023

I think I need to adjust my previous statement.  The problem with Canada’s economy is that Canada has too much government and all of it is corrupt and incompetent.

Trudeau has finally made things so bad that even normally clueless Canadian’s are starting to notice that for the first time in our history the future looks very bad indeed.

A new survey conducted by TD Bank Group shows that nearly 60 per cent of Canadian parents are concerned about their children’s financial future, primarily due to the impact of inflation and the prevailing economic uncertainties in the country.

The next generation of Canadians face declining a declining standard of living but CTV and the pollsters want you to know there is a solution; financial literacy.

According to the survey published on Wednesday, an overwhelming majority of surveyed parents (89 per cent) believe that their confidence in their children’s financial future would improve if their kids gained better financial knowledge before their teenage years.

Of course this is just the media and polling companies carry water for Justin Trudeau.  The poll was designed to absolve Justin of his guilt.  It was not Justin who stole your child’s future.  You are the Thief.  Your child’s future is at risk because you failed to teach them about finances.

So according to the CTV and the pollsters the solution to problems caused by the financial illiteracy of the Trudeau liberals is to improve the financial literacy of everyone else.  In a way I agree with them.  Improved financial literacy could get us out of this but only if it is used to inform voting choices.  That is probably why government public schools don’t teach finance or economics beyond explaining how wonderful socialism is.