The entire jab narrative is a lie

Emails have surfaced that prove former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and former NIH Director Francis Collins were aware that “break though infections” were common even while Wallensky continued to appear on television and claim that if you get vaccinated you will not get infected.

On Monday, we got a bombshell. New documents indicate the entire justification for vaccine mandates was based on a falsehood — and that public health officials knew it.

If the vaccine stopped COVID dead in its tracks, as Fauci explained, then the decision to institute a vaccine mandate would merely be a controversial yet ultimately legitimate public health measure. The fact it did not do that but rather had primarily personal benefits completely removes the justification for mandates.

Really who could have known that the jabs don’t provide immunity?  That fact was only known to anyone who bothered to research how the jabs actually worked.

Despite increasing breakthrough infections media and government still claim the jabs are effective because they result in less severe illness.  I find this odd for 2 reasons.  First the whole concept of breakthrough infections.  The Jabs are not designed to prevent infection just reduce symptoms.  What exactly is the virus breaking through?  We should have expected jabbed people to get infected.

To start the COVID jabs are not vaccines.  Many lies were told about the jabs but calling them a vaccine was the most egregious lie.  Everyone who took that jab thought they were taking a vaccine so that means that no one on earth gave informed consent.  They were lied to about what was going in to their arm.

A vaccine provokes a full antibody and T cell response.   The jabs provoke only a partial antibody and no T cell response.  Lasting immunity comes from the T cells so the jabs do not provide lasting immunity.  They don’t even provide temporary immunity because the antibody response is not complete.  The best the jabs have to offer is a head start on recovery and that limited benefit only lasts as long as the spike protein antibodies; 4 to 6 months.  Everyone involved knew this.  They all knew jabbed people could still get infected and transmit the virus.

There is no such thing as a breakthrough infection because there was no immunity for the virus to breakthrough.  They lied to get you to take an experimental treatment that they knew would have at best very limited benefits.  Then when people started to get sick they lied again and told you that the virus had mutated and the solution was boosters.  None of that was true.  From day one they knew the effect was temporary and boosters were always in the plan.

I don’t know about you but I am sick to death with the lies.  Every politician and highly paid bureaucrat like Wallensky intentionally lied to you.  This was a coordinated effort to push a dangerous but profitable experimental treatment.  It was a criminal conspiracy to commit murder.  Wallensky must go to prison and she should have a lot of company.

2 replies
  1. Erica
    Erica says:

    “Breakthrough infections” was one of the many deliberately misleading terms used “during Covid” that kept the public from having a uniform understanding of what we were dealing with. Lying, gaslighting those who point out the lies, and keeping people confused are tactics used by psychos and/or abusive people. But to face that our “trusted leaders” did these things is much too difficult for most, so we have a great many people experiencing Stockholm syndrome!!!

Comments are closed.