Why can’t we punish mass murderers?
I found an article a few days ago that performed a detailed analysis of UK death statistics. They concluded that since 2021 there have been 170,000 unexplained deaths.
then the excess death count is in reality higher still, to the tune of a further 170,000 excess deaths thus far since 2021
As Covid is a negligible factor in overall mortality statistics now, something else has caused these excess deaths. Furthermore, whatever it is appears to still be working its insidious effects as we begin 2026.
8 months ago, I did a similar but far less detailed analysis of Canadian deaths that showed much the same thing. At the end of 2024 there are more than 70,000 unexplained deaths in Canada.
Some day we will bring ourselves to admit the abnormally high deaths since 2020 are a direct result of the vaccines. So far 72,000 Canadians died because they made the mistake of trusting government.
None of this had to happen. Common sense said that young healthy people did not need an experimental vaccine for a disease that presented no danger to them. Even if the COVID vaccines were effective there was still no reason to force the risk of side effects on people who were not at risk from the virus. The decision to force the vaccines on everyone was bad. Forcing them on everyone when the vaccine trials were fraudulent is criminal.
-
Vaccine safety research is layered with endless assumptions that vaccines must be completely safe, concealing actual harms, yet this research—which never actually proved safety (due to those assumptions)—is presented as ironclad proof vaccines are both safe and effective.
-
In many instances trials will become unblinded. For example, in the COVID-19 trials, trial investigators testified (and published data indicated) that the trial was not blinded, resulting in vaccine recipients with COVID like symptoms not being PCR tested for COVID-19 (thereby reducing their COVID cases and inflating vaccine efficacy), much in the same manner adverse events were not logged from vaccine recipients.
Once again, I wish I had been wrong. In 2022 I pointed out that the trials were likely unblinded from the start.
To say that the Pfizer test data submitted for emergency authorization was incomplete is a gross under exaggeration. The Pfizer trial did not use standardized testing. Testing was at the researcher’s discretion and the researchers decided not to follow up on more than 85% of the suspected COVID infections split evenly between the vaccine and placebo groups. The limited selective testing was a huge red flag that the study had been un-blinded. The researchers knew who was in each group and carefully avoided testing people in the vaccine group for COVID.
It does not please me that I am again proven correct. If it was easy for me to determine the study had been unblinded and was fraudulent there is no way the regulators did not also know it. This goes beyond fraud. This was murder. When will someone answer for this crime?


That is a great paper. I appreciate their analysis of the mortality displacement, pointing out that all of the excess mortality on a given year will necessarily REDUCE the baseline mortality in subsequent years. As you can only die once.
But the excess mortality numbers remain elevated for 5 years running with no evidence it’s going away. That means the problem is getting worse! It’s simply not plausible without something that has changed. (Of course We all know what THAT is).
But the one thing they don’t analyze is breaking down the excess mortality between jabbed and unjabbed. This data is in existence. It was religiously collected so the government could punish those smart enough to not accept being poked. That simple addition to the analysis would either completely destroy the idea of excess mortality being from the jab or it would conclusively show it to be true. There is only ONE reason that data is not allowed out.
Kill 7 people? Go to jail for the rest of your life.
Kill 470,000 people? Meh!