Multiculturalism and structural racism are a package deal
I have stated before on this blog you can have a multiracial society but you cannot have a multicultural society. A functioning multiracial society must by definition not be racist. A multicultural society will inevitably be racist where different cultures get categorized by race and judged by a different standard. Judging different races by a different standard is the very definition of racism.
Multiracial societies can work if all races agree to abide by the same rules, laws and be on the same team. Multiculturalism however, enables people to go by their own rules, laws and play their own game, and we’ve seen the effects of it. Just look at the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs in Rotherham, Rochdale and Telford.
For those of you who don’t know, over 1400 white underage British girls were raped by Pakistani Muslims in the 3 English cities listed above. The rapes happened over a period of 20 years. For 20 years British police overlooked 1400 rapes because the rapists were not white; a really odd form of white privilege don’t you think?
This is what happens when you hold different cultures to different standards. Right and wrong is determined by where you were born or even where your grandparents were born. But, we would never let something like this happen in good old multicultural Canada would we? Sorry but yes we would and yes we do. In fact it is enshrined in Canadian law that race determines the severity of the crime and the punishment.
The law of racial discounts was codified long ago and has only snowballed since. Indigenous-specific sentencing principles were codified into law in the 1990s, and since then those lighter sentencing principles have been expanded to apply to other groups depending on the province. The result is a gut-churning habit of courts to take a lighter touch to punishing sexual abuse depending on the identity of the offender.
“Incarceration is not the answer for (the accused),” wrote the judge. “It would only add to the problem of over-incarceration of Indigenous people
30 years ago some lunatics on the Canadian supreme court decided that native criminals should not be held to the same standard as non-native criminals. How stupid must you be to believe not punishing criminals is the way to deter crime? So how is this policy of not punishing violent native men working out for Canadians? Well 30 years later we have a lot of missing and murdered aboriginal women.
The Trudeau liberals held an inquiry to get to the bottom of this problem. They had to fire several people before they could find an inquiry leader who would blame the problem on white people. Every sane person, of whom our current government has none, knows why this happened. The courts released violent native men right back in to the communities that they had been victimizing. What the F&$K did you think was going to happen? The only white people who you can blame for this tragedy are the racist white liberal judges who made this insane ruling.
As always in Canada with time our lunatic judiciary has slowly expanded this ruling to encompass more than just aboriginals. The 1990 crack that allowed this stupidity to seep in has become a chasm. Now as long as you are not white and your family immigrated to Canada in the not too distant past you get to be held to a lower standard.
The rape was balanced against the man’s background: originally from the Democratic Republic of Congo, he and his family left the country when he was two, moving to Zambia, and then Namibia, and finally Canada when he was 14. The court took into consideration the fact that his family had experienced “loss of security and safety” in refugee camps (though he did not recall witnessing conflict). Also considered was the systemic racism that he alleged to have impacted his life.
Since 1990 Canada has been structurally racist, just not in the way Justin Trudeau thinks it is. That was the price for multiculturalism.
