The financial fall out from COVID

An audit of American government COVID relief funds has already found $276 billion dollars of fraud.  That is not surprising since the whole purpose of government manufactured emergencies is fraud.  The only thing that made COVID different from previous fake emergencies was size.  COVID lockdowns resulted in unprecedented increases in government spending which in turn spawned unprecedented levels of fraud.  It really is an issue of scale; spend billions to steal millions or spend trillions to steal billions.

Joe Biden spent Trillions because no one stopped him.  That allowed him to steal billions and give it to wealthy friends.  Those wealthy friends tried to maximize their ill-gotten gains by investing it. That is where the trouble started.  It turns out that investing when the economy is shut down means giving your money to companies that can’t spend it.  They put it in the bank who also can’t find any good use for it so they invest in government bonds.  The whole stupid enterprise then collapses when the Fed raises interest rates.

That in a nutshell is how the Silicon Valley Bank died of COVID.

During the pandemic, fluffy money, made from nothing by Big Government to “save the economy” was put into stupid businesses to “save the planet”. The businesses put their cash into Silicon Valley Bank, which got so much cash, it couldn’t do anything with half of it — except give it back to Big-Government in the form of a loan called a Treasury Bond — thus completing one full Cycle of Stupid. Money printed from nothing, achieved nothing, and went back home. On the way a whole lot of people got paid to pretend to change the weather. But money printing causes inflation, and in inflationary times interest rates have to rise. So it follows that when easy money flows into your wallet, easy solutions, like fixed loans with low interest are the stupidest possible solution.

Shutting down the economy to fight a virus was an extremely stupid decision that we are not done paying for.  We are about to enter the darkest point of the Dumb ages led by corrupt simpletons like Biden and Trudeau.  God help us.

 

The Perfect Storm Destroying Canada

If you don’t live in Canada you are probably not aware that Justin Trudeau is involved in another scandal.  It seems the communist party of China has been interfering in Canadian elections.  Incredibly the interference has been somewhat of an open secret among the Chinese community.

“If we want to say who are the 11 potential nominees that CSIS had kind of mentioned, I can pretty much guess who they are,” said Cheuk Kwan, co-chair of the Toronto Association for Democracy in China.

“China’s interference in Canada has been soft, intangible, and gradual. As a result, this build up over the years, the 90 percent of the iceberg if you were, remains invisible to many Canadians,” he said.

Normally Canada gets ignored on the world stage because Justin Trudeau’s has made Canada irrelevant but this story has attracted some American media attention.  The legacy Canadian media, however, is downplaying the issue while the RCMP is persecuting whistleblowers.  Normally dishonest behavior by the media and thuggish behavior by the RCMP is all that it takes to kill a story in Canada but this time it is different.  This time Canadians are paying attention and wondering why no one is investigating the Chinese.  Some reporters are even doing the unthinkable and asking Justin Trudeau real questions.

 

Trudeau has no evidence because Trudeau is not looking for evidence.  Why would he?  He already knows what happened.  It is no secret that Trudeau is China’s bitch.  China has always helped him get elected because for China Trudeau is the perfect western leader; incredibly stupid and completely corrupt.

Justin Trudeau is what happens when everything goes wrong.  His biological father is likely Fidel Castro, a murderous communist dictator.  His step father Pierre was a communist sympathizer, habitual Liar, and, until Justin, easily the most destructive Prime Minister in our History.  Justin’s mother was a promiscuous, drug addled, lunatic.  Nature vs. nurture is a moot point.  Justin had the worst of both.  There was absolutely no chance that Justin would become a decent human being.

Justin Trudeau is the perfect storm.  All of the stars aligned to produce an absolutely terrible human being.  Devoted to communist ideology possessing absolutely no intelligence or ethics.  With no accomplishments other than impregnating an underage girl, he rode his last name and Chinese money right into the prime minister’s office.  Justin is the ultimate Manchurian Candidate.

“I am still mad at myself for that—for being convinced, at one point in time, that the prime minister was an honest and good person, when, in truth, he would so casually lie to the public and then think he could get away with it.”

Thoughts on Justin Trudeau by Canada’s former Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould

 

Killing People to save the Planet

Much of the world is dealing with spiraling energy costs.  The problem is very acute in Germany where the government decided to save the planet by sacrificing their citizens.  I think Germans will be pissed when they realize they are not saving anything.  Their ridiculous policies are based on junk science provided by the environmental lobby.

With growing awareness that the energy crisis could become a lethal threat to the Greens’ top priority of climate change, Robert Habeck’s ministry commissioned three different think tanks to calculate the potential costs of climate change for Germany.

The results were unsurprisingly catastrophic, showing that the issue would cost almost a trillion euros until 2050. The assumptions of the study, though, were entirely unrealistic, and based on a global warming scenario that was recently banned from use in US agencies due to its lack of validity.

Based on this flawed study, however, Germany decided to push even harder for the energy transition, motivated by yet another set of faulty assumptions.

What makes the situation even more frustrating is that these studies are easy to debunk if one only takes the time to read them, rather than relying on a press release from the ministry. Yet almost no media outlet was doing that — most probably because the results were not just aligned with the Green agenda, but also with the personal views of most journalists.

The environmental movement is dishonest and dangerous.  Their ridiculously unscientific doomsday scenarios cause politicians to make remarkably stupid decisions.  Politicians are naturally predisposed to stupidity and really don’t need the encouragement.   The climate cult convinced pot addled California politicians that snow was no longer a possibility.  As a result

Like most blue enclaves, California didn’t plan for real-world climate variations. Now people are dead.

A dozen deaths have been reported in mountain towns, many of them elderly people cut off by the snow, under a political system that had decided to pretend that snow was a relic of the distant past.

Snow was supposed to disappear. Climate mitigation strategies often acted like it didn’t exist or as if the defining climate situation would involve less and less of it, not more and more.

A dozen deaths are tragic but it is a drop in the bucket compared to what will happen from the attack on farming.  The first battles in the war on farming are being fought in the Netherlands.  On the weekend I found this glowing article celebrating the architect of this lunacy; Johen Vollenbroek.  Like other narcissists in the environmental movement Vollenbroek doesn’t understand why people don’t recognize that he is a prophet sent by god to save the planet.

Back in his kitchen in Nijmegen, Vollenbroek is baffled by farmers who don’t see the world in his terms. “We do not want you to get out of business, but you have to change,” he tells farmers when he meets them. “We have neglected the climate and we have neglected our natural reserves all over the world.”

He doesn’t want to eliminate farming he just wants to change farming.  God has apparently given him farming knowledge that is far superior to the thousands of people actually making a living off of farming.  We should be way more thankful for his divine presence.

When I first learned of these farm confiscation policies I did a little research about nitrogen fertilizer and nitrogen oxides.  I could not find anything that showed nitrogen fertilizer was much of a problem so I was very interested in what Vollenbroek’s justification was.  Apparently he is concerned about plants he does not like and dead fish.  That is why we must ban another essential building block of life.

While nitrogen is an essential building block of life, in large quantities it becomes a toxic killer. Some fast-growing plants thrive on it and turn into monstrous ecosystem overlords. Smaller, rarer species, like herbs, lichens and mosses, are driven out. Across the Netherlands, but especially in sensitive grasslands and marshes, the soil is turning increasingly acidic. In waterways, nitrogen spurs algal growth, sucking oxygen from the water. Fish suffocate.

Invasive species and dead fish can be a problem but how big is the problem?  How many fish and plants will we save by restricting fertilizer and confiscating farms?  The article does not say, and that in a nut shell is the primary problem with the modern environmental movement.  The Environmental movement will never recognize that their actions have consequences beyond saving fish.  I cannot tell you how many fish will be saved by restricting fertilizer but I can tell you hundreds of millions of people will starve.

That may seem like hyperbole but it is not; we have been to this movie before.  In 1962 a book called the silent spring was published.  The book detailed how some pesticides were damaging the environment.  DDT was singled out because it was causing reproductive problems (thin egg shells) in some types of raptors.  As a result DDT bans started and by 1972 it was banned worldwide.  No one stopped to consider what would happen from banning DDT.  The assumption was that countries were spending millions of dollars per year on pesticide programs for no reason other than killing birds.

Of course that was not true.  DDT was used in Africa to control malaria mosquitos.  By using DDT Africa had nearly eliminated malaria; banning DDT caused malaria cases to skyrocket for 30 years.  Africa has only recently gotten malaria back under control.  The plot below is from South Africa.

Millions of Africans, mostly children, died to save birds.  Couldn’t we have allowed high malaria areas to continue to use DDT until a better alternative was discovered?  Not according to the left.  The left never considers the cost of any of their policies just the benefits.  Africans know the price is often paid in human misery and death.

They do not care if their policies kill people because their core philosophy is people bad, everything else good.  Their core belief is that humans need to be eradicated.  We should never let these homicidal lunatics set public policy.

Risk Mitigation

The problem of excess deaths is simply too large to ignore anymore.  Many more people than normal are dying and that is not the only anomaly.  Abnormally high numbers of young people are dying and, inconveniently for the government, they are dying suddenly in front of cameras.

 

Government funded ‘experts” are quite perplexed by what could be causing this epidemic of sudden death.  So far they have only ruled out one variable but everything else is on the table.  Doctors have speculated that there could be a number of factors at play including;

  • People skipping doctors’ appointments
  • People not taking prescription drugs
  • Long COVID
  • Underfunded public health spending
  • Climate change

With so many possible causes, except of course the one we absolutely, positively know that it cannot be, finding a solution is very daunting indeed.  If I were a medical doctor I think I might look for a common denominator.  Perhaps we can start with the latest government statistics from the UK which shows this peculiar correlation.

It seems all the excess deaths are among the vaccinated.  Since we absolutely, positively, know that it cannot be the jabs this raises some interesting questions.  What is it about taking the Jab that makes people more likely to skip doctor’s appointments?  Could it be overconfidence in their superior health due to being more virtuous than people who did not take the Jab?  Is this overconfidence also to blame for them skipping medications?

And, what about Climate change?  Why are vaccinated people more susceptible to climate change?  Do they take crazy chances like going outside when the temperature is more than 1 degree above average?  Do they ignore hurricane evacuation orders or carelessly emit too much CO2?

Ultimately we may never know the answer to these important questions.  But, for now, I think we should take this data at face value.  Since vaccinated people are more susceptible to climate change and climate change is the biggest threat facing mankind, to me the answer is obvious.  If we want to mitigate the effects of climate change we should stop vaccinating.  We can figure out all the other stuff later.

Controlling the Narrative to Control People

I saw this video again a few days ago.  I don’t know when the original dates from but it does not matter because everything he says was true then and it is still true now.  Climate change is a hoax and everyone in power knows that.

 

To be clear it is not a hoax that the climate is changing.  The earth is a very dynamic system; everything changes, even the position of the continents.  There has never been a time in the 4.5 billion year history of the earth where climate did not change.  Go ask any geologist.  The geologic record is full of evidence of climate change; sometimes very rapid climate change.

So climate change is happening.  That is not a hoax.  What is a hoax is that we can stop the climate from changing by restricting CO2.  In the grand scheme of climate CO2 is a minor factor.  Increasing CO2 from current levels will result mostly in faster plant growth.  A significant decrease in CO2 from current levels would result in the end of all life on earth.  You decide.

All of the prophets of climate doom know this.  I think Mark Steyn said it best when he said “I will start believing in climate change when the people in charge start behaving like they believe in climate change”.  My apologies to Mark Steyn, I am paraphrasing because I can’t find the original quote.  Steyn is 100% correct it is not just the bank executives that don’t believe coastal areas will be swamped.  None of the Climate Change Prophets do either.  Obama, Gore, Suzuki, and many others own beach front property.  If these people believed their own bullshit they would all live at high altitude in northern regions but they do not.

But it is true that sea level is rising.  It has been rising consistently by about 2.5 mm per year since the end of the little ice age in 1850.  At that rate it will take 400 years to rise only 1 meter (3 feet 3 inches). Sea level is rising so slowly that even small pacific islands have not lost any measurable amount of surface area.  So it would seem that reports of New York’s demise have been greatly exaggerated.

Coastal areas are not in imminent danger yet governments are enacting dangerously stupid climate policies in response to this nonexistent threat.  They are restricting food production and making it impossible for poor people to afford home heating.  Incredibly their policies even encourage slavery and child labor.

 

Government justifies these disgusting policies by calling climate change an existential threat which it clearly is not.  It is true however that many people believe climate change is an existential threat.  So how did that happen?  How did so many people come to believe in something so absurd?  After 3 years of COVID rational people know the answer to that.  It is not that difficult for a small group of people to fool the masses.  All you need is fear and fraudulent science.

When it comes to climate change the fraudulent science comes from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).  The IPCC self identifies as the gold standard in science; they are trans-scientists.  The panel meets regularly to produce fraudulent reports on climate change.  They then release these reports to governments who produce the fear.

Governments produce the fear by disseminating the fraudulent IPCC reports internally with instructions for each agency to produce policy positions based on the fraudulent predictions.  The result is multiple agencies issuing alarming reports of what needs to be done to prevent imaginary doomsday scenarios.  The media then does their part by broadcasting each alarming report.  The public is inundated with reports from multiple agencies declaring climate change as the number one problem on earth.

Viola, there is now a consensus.  It seems that all of these agencies have independently arrived at the same conclusion but that is nowhere near true.  All of the secondary reports are based on a single fraudulent IPCC report.

The Trudeau government never ceases with this dishonest behavior and that is why CSIS (Canada’s version of the CIA) just released a report declaring that climate change is a national security threat and non-believers are potentially violent domestic terrorists.

A newly released analysis by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service also foresees an increase in ideologically motivated violent extremism from people who want to speed up climate change solutions and those more interested in preserving their current way of life

Trudeau is getting a lot of mileage out of fraudulent UN sponsored science.  Now anyone who disagrees with a carbon tax of $9/GJ on natural gas that sells for $3/GJ is obviously a terrorist.  They can expect CSIS to interrogate their neighbors and freeze their bank accounts.  The Trudeau Liberals next election slogan should be freezing to fight warming.

CSIS took the fraudulent predictions given to them by a proven habitual liar (Justin Trudeau) at face value.  That is a little surprising for a spy agency but it does explain how China gets away with rigging our elections and running their own police in Canada.  The fraudulent data was used to produce the alarming report Justin desired “proving” the dangers of climate change.

Extrapolating fraudulent data to a nightmare scenario does not prove anything but the report does show how frightfully naïve Canadians are about climate change.  CSIS actually admitted that the biggest problem with a warmer planet will be how attractive Canada becomes for immigration.

“Canada will likely be seen as a desirable place for future immigration flows, not only due to its stable economy and fundamental rights and freedoms, but also its significant freshwater and agricultural endowments and vast territory that offer options for mass relocation.”

Didn’t they just admit that a warmer earth benefits a northern nation like Canada?  Why would we do anything to prevent that?  Doesn’t that statement also insinuate that the effects of climate change can be mitigated by enforcing immigration laws?  I doubt that was the conclusion Justin wanted but it is one I can live with.

Arresting Fauci starts the Ball Rolling

When the origins of the SARS COV-2 virus were first questioned Anthony Fauci was adamant; the virus was naturally occurring.  His evidence was a paper that concluded the virus had no characteristics that would be expected if it had been engineered.  We now know that paper was junk science produced for and at the direction of Anthony Fauci.

This is the state of science in the 21st century.  Science is no longer a process of discovery it is now a tool of obfuscation.  The scientific process used to work like this.

  1. Observe some natural phenomena.
  2. Develop a hypothesis about the cause.
  3. Design an experiment or collect data to evaluate your hypothesis with emphasis on trying to disprove it.
  4. If the hypothesis is disproved, develop a new hypothesis and start again.
  5. If the hypothesis cannot be disproven wait for your theory to be accepted as a law decades or centuries after your death.

Following this process rarely leads to instant acknowledgement or remuneration but it is very good at advancing knowledge.  In the 21st century decisions are made based on feelings and consensus not knowledge so the scientific process has changed to reflect our knowledge phobic modern society.  It now goes something like this.

  1. A government bureaucracy decides on a policy to be pursued.
  2. Emotionally charged Lies are developed that would support the desired policy or outcome.
  3. A marketing campaign is developed and held in reserve.
  4. Ethically challenged people with science degrees are hired and given the conclusions along with a generous taxpayer funded grant.
  5. The “scientists” manipulate or fabricate data to support the conclusions.
  6. A paper is issued after peer review by people also receiving taxpayer funded grants.
  7. The previously developed marketing program is implemented again using gigantic amounts of taxpayer money.

This new process is usually fool proof.  Government officials like Fauci use it to cover their tracks after they do very disgusting things and, make no mistake about it, what Fauci did was disgusting.  He did not just finance the development of a new virus; he is part of the cabal that released it.

The evidence has always indicated that the virus was engineered.  Once everyone finally accepts that it will become apparent that the release was not accidental.  The evidence led me to that conclusion long ago.  That is why I wrote this nearly 2 years ago.

Why I believe this was not an accident.

Again I have no smoking gun but many things taken together make this the most likely explanation.  Even things that point to it being accidental still make sense if it was intentional.  Like the outbreak starting in China.  The logical argument is that the Chinese would not release the virus inside China.  The reality is that if China wanted to disguise their intentions, it had to be released in China.  If a virus common to Chinese Bats first appears in The US people will smell a rat (or in this case a bat).

We need to accept then that an intentional release makes as much sense as an accident. 

The evidence is also clear that China did not act alone.

The Chinese did not do this without help.  They had cooperation from the media and foreign governments; including senior members of the American bureaucracy.  It was not a coincidence that the media moved in lockstep.  They all ramped up panic with breathlessly ridiculous reporting.  Suppression of treatment information was aggressive and complete.

COVID was manufactured for the political and financial benefit of a small group of people that includes Anthony Fauci.  If you want to get to the bottom of it arrest one of them.  Anthony Fauci would be a good place to start.  He has been at the center of this from the very beginning.

An arrest of Fauci has two possible outcomes.

  1. The lying little weasel will sing and provide evidence on his co-conspirators.

Or;

  1. The cameras in the cell block will go down while the guards are asleep and Fauci will commit suicide by being strangled by another inmate.

I am OK with either outcome so what are we waiting for?

One was a Pandemic, the other a Criminal Conspiracy

When the proper accounting is finally done for COVID it will show very few people died of COVID.  They did not die from their comorbidities either.  Most COVID fatalities were the result of medical malpractice.  Doctors were convinced, coerced, or compelled to use protocols that increased the number of people dying.  Over the last 3 year millions of people died unnecessarily.

That might be hard to believe but dying at the hands of a doctor is far more common than you think.  There is even a medical term for it.  An Iatrogentic injury is an injury caused by medical treatment.

IATROGENIC | English meaning – Cambridge Dictionary

(of a disease or problem) caused by medical treatment or by a doctor: Iatrogenic infections are responsible for thousands of deaths among hospital patients each .

It is not even unprecedented for doctors to collectively kill millions over a relatively short time as happened during the Spanish flu pandemic.  The Spanish flu hit at the end of WW1 in 1918.  21 million people died but what was most shocking was the number of young healthy soldiers who died.  Influenzas don’t normally kill the young and healthy so the death of otherwise healthy soldiers fueled panic.  Now 100 years later science is starting to realize those soldiers were not killed by the Spanish flu they were killed by Aspirin.

Aspirin had only been recently discovered and marketed.  Because Aspirin was good at reducing fevers doctors prescribed it liberally to treat the Spanish flu; too liberally as it turns out.  Military doctors were prescribing 8 to 32 grams per day.  The average size of a soldier in WW1 was 141.5 lbs.  A toxic dose of aspirin for a 141.5 lbs. man can be as little as 13 grams.  Many young men died due to medical malpractice.

To be clear, despite what the news tells you, COVID is not the Spanish flu.  The Spanish flu killed 18 times as many people on a population basis.  Still there are many parallels between what happened then and what is happening now.   People made decisions out of fear and many of those decisions were deadly.  There is however one fundamental difference between what happened in 1918 and what we are currently living through.  The Spanish flu occurred naturally and caught everyone off guard.  Doctors were forced to scramble.  COVID was engineered.  A group of conspirators built a virus, released it, and then controlled every aspect of how patients were treated.  In 1918 doctors tried to save patients.  During COVID doctors were forced to kill patients.

The Spanish flu was a serious pandemic made worse by medical errors.  COVID is a criminal conspiracy to commit murder for profit; big difference.

An Article everyone must read

I found an excellent article on Ivor Cummins’s twitter (@FatEmperor).  There is no doubt this article by Michael Bryant will be linked a thousand times today and it should be.  Please send it to all your friends to read.  Bryant methodically dissects how the COVID hysteria was started in Northern Italy.  COVID was a manufactured crisis and Northern Italy was chosen as the ideal spot to launch the fear campaign.  Not only was northern Italy an area of overall poor health, Italy also needed a crisis to cover up financial malfeasance.

Italy also had the motivation which becomes apparent once you understand the Covid story through the lens of money, power, control, and wealth transfer.

A financially bankrupt country with a financial sector desperate for bailouts and a command structure run by central bankers made for a willing and compliant government.

 

Predators who saw their financial empires coming apart at the seams resolved to shut down society and loot the world in an attempt to salvage their crumbling financial empires.

In order not to solve the problems they created these financial predators needed a cover story.

A cover story big enough to disguise the countless financial crimes they committed and suppress the social problems they created.

That cover story magically appeared in the form of a “novel virus.”

The article is so good there were too many quotes to use.  I would have simply been copying the whole article.  I will end with one more however, since it reflects exactly what I have been saying on this blog for more than 2 years.  COVID was never an emergency.  It was government that did most of the killing.

 

The only pandemic was one of violent government and biomedical assault against people.

The evidence from Italy in 2020 exposes the official “Covid” narrative for what it is- a cold-blooded organized deception.

There was no pandemic.

When you spend Billions no one notices Missing Millions

A friend of mine sent me this unique business opportunity.  The province of Manitoba is about to auction off 105 visitation pods.  If you have never heard about a visitation Pod before you are likely not alone.  They are a uniquely COVID invention that I only discovered when my friend sent me this article.

Visitation pods were installed at Manitoba nursing homes so that people could visit their elderly relatives without entering the nursing home.  Essentially they are shipping containers wired with lights, ventilation and a heater.

The Pods are no longer needed, largely because they were never need but also because COVID fear is no longer necessary.  Since we are willing to accept permanent lockdowns in the form of 15 minute cities fraudulent COVID lockdowns are redundant.  The province of Manitoba is looking to sell the pods to re-deploy the capital into traffic bollards.

The province is not sure how much money the auction will raise but they are not worried because they got such a deal in the first place.  They proudly boast the pods only cost $695,000 each when the original budget was $805,000 each.  This is a prime example of government efficiency.  Provincial health bureaucrats only spent $73 million on 105 shipping containers when they expected to spend $85 Million.  In government accounting that is a savings of $114,000 per unit on wired shipping containers worth about $50,000 each.

Only government could spend $695,000 on an electrified shipping container.  Private enterprise would have done this far cheaper or likely not at all.  Many Canadians work in remote locations.  To accommodate workers in temporary remote locations companies rent fully equipped portable trailers designed to be easily moved and installed.  There are thousands of these in Canada that were not being used during the government enforced COVID stupidity.  They could have been rented for as little as $100/day.  To rent 105 for 2 years would have cost $766 thousand or about what the Manitoba government paid for 1 unit.

This is just one more example of colossal government waste but that is the point of a manufactured emergency.  An emergency is always a reason for government action and by government action I mean government spending.  No one questions spending when there is an emergency; something had to be done after all.  These shipping containers did not cost $695,000 each.  Even for government the cost was likely under $100,000.  The rest was syphoned off in to bank accounts of friends and family.

Politicians and senior bureaucrats create emergencies to supplement their incomes.  That is why we always have some sort of crisis that demands government intervention.  People in government make money from emergencies, both fake and real.  Their incentive is to prolong emergencies just as they did for 3 years with COVID.

Is it any surprise then that our policy is to prolong the Ukraine war and send money indefinitely?  Ukraine is one of the most corrupt countries on earth and we are sending just enough to keep them fighting while discouraging them from seeking peace.  The same bastards that manufactured the COVID emergency are now cynically encouraging Ukrainians to keep dying so the gravy train keeps rolling.

We may never know how much money was stolen using COVID as an excuse.  Certainly we will never know how much money is now being stolen in the Ukraine or how much each dead Ukrainian was worth to some western politician.

Can a Professional Politician even understand Freedom?

During the COVID lockdowns Pierre Poilievre was the finance critic.  Every day he would stand up in parliament and question the Trudeau liberals about rampant, uncontrolled spending.  I thought this was useless because it did not address the economic elephant in the room which was the unnecessary lockdowns.  I emailed Poilievre and asked him why he was tip toeing around the root cause.  No one from his office bothered to respond.

So when Poilievre decided to run for leadership as a pro-freedom candidate I was skeptical.  He never said anything about freedom during the lockdowns.  It looked to me like it was just a convenient campaign slogan.  Nevertheless Poilievre toured the country promising to make Canada the freest country on earth.  I am not sure he is up to the task given that he can’t even convince his wife that freedom is important.

Poilievre is so new to the concept of freedom that he gets confused when other people talk about it.  That is likely why he decided to disparage freedom advocate Christine Anderson.  Unlike Poilievre, MEP Anderson was a very vocal opponent of COVID lockdowns.  I find it very difficult to take Poilievre’s freedom platform seriously after his remarks.  It seems his concept of freedom is a lot closer to Justin Trudeau’s than it is to mine.

In fact the more he speaks the more I realize how close he is to Trudeau and how far he is from me.  Recently Poilievre made it clear that his ideas about who should have priority when it comes to spending money I earned are not much different than Trudeau’s.  The hierarchy both men use is in the table below.  At the top is the person/entity with the highest priority to my money, at the bottom is the lowest.

With Poilievre I will be free to spend any of my money that the government does not take from me.  With Trudeau I am free to shut up and take it.  I really don’t know what to do with all of the Freedom I am being offered.